Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 May 2016, 18:45
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2006, 14:21
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:05) wrong based on 3 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. Clearly, corporations should adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.
B. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal.
C. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem.
D. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon.
E. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1348
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Re: cr: the use of executive titles [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2006, 16:50
freshlily wrote:
Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. Clearly, corporations should adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.
B. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal.
C. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem.
D. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon.
E. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.


i am naive to BFCR. however go with E.. will explain.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2006, 17:23
I am going with A . OA please?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2006, 22:22
one more for A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 52
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2006, 02:07
consultant says he is supporting usage of EXECUTIVE title.

I go with C.


OA please.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2006, 02:46
Some corporations shun the use of executive titles - Strategy
use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses - if this is true, then strategy not effective.

Hence go with A.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 790
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2006, 06:48
Can someone explain why not B)?
Where is the drawback of the strategy in A?
Vote for B
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 945
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2006, 06:55
E looks to be the only choice
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 476
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2006, 07:58
I'll go with A.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2006, 03:04
Will go with A here.
Some corporations shun the use of executive titles - Strategy
use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses - Advantage of using a title, hence drawback to the startegy

B - wrong, as the goal is to improve communication within. The second bold part doesnot question the effectiveness of the strategy to achieve the goal as the consultant states adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation"

OA please??????
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1134
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2006, 06:30
I'll go for E through POE.

A. The second is not a drawback. It presents another view.
B. The EFFECTIVENESS? (Out of scope)
C. The SIGNIFICANCE? (Out of scope)
D. The first and second are definitely related to different situations. One is within the organization and the other is outside the organization.
E. All others seem wrong. So E through POE.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 231
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2006, 07:05
I have narrowed it down to A or C

To me C sounds very negative in it approach.

A sounds more like a cause and effect.

I will go with A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 65
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2006, 09:35
I will go with (B) here.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 158
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2006, 09:41
The second bolded statement does not seem to b a drwback.Though it presnts an advatage over the first approach. ll go with E
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 15
Location: Indiana
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: cr: the use of executive titles [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2006, 13:33
freshlily wrote:
Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. Clearly, corporations should adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.
B. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal.
C. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem.
D. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon.
E. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.


Ill go with E here too. It is definitely NOT a drawback. The company is simply stating that usage of external titles should be encouraged while using titles should be abolished.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2006, 10:15
I'll go with A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2006, 06:02
Between A and E, I will go with E.
_________________

...................................................................
reloading NEURON JELLY to reach another galaxy.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 126
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2006, 13:02
I'll go with A. Anybody has any idea what's the approach to follow for solving Bold Faced reasoning questions? Most of the times I am clueless with BF questions as all the choices seem similar.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2006, 03:15
definitely A.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2006, 03:20
A.
  [#permalink] 29 May 2006, 03:20

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear fidome7 3 24 Nov 2015, 03:27
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of rohitgoel15 22 01 Feb 2012, 00:23
Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of perfectstranger 4 25 Jul 2009, 04:19
18 Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of icandy 43 18 Feb 2009, 14:48
Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of msrinath 2 18 Jun 2007, 09:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.