|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 15
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of [#permalink]
14 May 2006, 14:21
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (00:05) wrong based on 0 sessions
Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. Clearly, corporations should adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.
In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.
B. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal.
C. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem.
D. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon.
E. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1356
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
Re: cr: the use of executive titles [#permalink]
14 May 2006, 16:50
freshlily wrote: Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. Clearly, corporations should adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.
In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy. B. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal. C. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem. D. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon. E. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.
i am naive to BFCR. however go with E.. will explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 38
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I am going with A . OA please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 448
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
one more for A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 52
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
consultant says he is supporting usage of EXECUTIVE title.
I go with C.
OA please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 666
Location: London
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Some corporations shun the use of executive titles - Strategy
use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses - if this is true, then strategy not effective.
Hence go with A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 811
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Can someone explain why not B)?
Where is the drawback of the strategy in A?
Vote for B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Location: France
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
E looks to be the only choice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
I'll go with A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1744
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
Will go with A here.
Some corporations shun the use of executive titles - Strategy
use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses - Advantage of using a title, hence drawback to the startegy
B - wrong, as the goal is to improve communication within. The second bold part doesnot question the effectiveness of the strategy to achieve the goal as the consultant states adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation"
OA please??????
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1138
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
I'll go for E through POE.
A. The second is not a drawback. It presents another view.
B. The EFFECTIVENESS? (Out of scope)
C. The SIGNIFICANCE? (Out of scope)
D. The first and second are definitely related to different situations. One is within the organization and the other is outside the organization.
E. All others seem wrong. So E through POE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 231
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
I have narrowed it down to A or C
To me C sounds very negative in it approach.
A sounds more like a cause and effect.
I will go with A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 65
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I will go with (B) here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 158
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
The second bolded statement does not seem to b a drwback.Though it presnts an advatage over the first approach. ll go with E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 15
Location: Indiana
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: cr: the use of executive titles [#permalink]
24 May 2006, 13:33
freshlily wrote: Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. Clearly, corporations should adopt the compromise of encouraging their executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation’s executives use titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.
In the consultant’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second presents a drawback to that strategy. B. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the effectiveness of that strategy as a means of achieving that goal. C. The first describes a strategy that has been adopted to avoid a certain problem; the second is a consideration the consultant raises in questioning the significance of that problem. D. The first is part of an explanation that the consultant offers for a certain phenomenon; the second is that phenomenon. E. The first describes a policy for which the consultant seeks to provide a justification; the second is a consideration the consultant raises as part of that justification.
Ill go with E here too. It is definitely NOT a drawback. The company is simply stating that usage of external titles should be encouraged while using titles should be abolished.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
I'll go with A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Between A and E, I will go with E.
_________________
...................................................................
reloading NEURON JELLY to reach another galaxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 126
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
I'll go with A. Anybody has any idea what's the approach to follow for solving Bold Faced reasoning questions? Most of the times I am clueless with BF questions as all the choices seem similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 588
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
definitely A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 2
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|