By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 17:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 72
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 4

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2011, 21:55
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

54% (02:07) correct 46% (01:10) wrong based on 252 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 341 [0], given: 123

Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2011, 22:00
There is missing comma before "enabling". A is correct.

fanatico wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 72
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 4

Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2011, 22:02
isn't "it" ambiguous in A and B?
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 341 [0], given: 123

Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2011, 22:16
Actually there's more to it than meets the eye

The modifier "ing" in A modifies the previous clause and sentence was written with that intention.
In D and E- they and them are spoilers.

B and C - are unidiomatic. - for withhold/withholding

The idiom is "enable to withhold"

fanatico wrote:
isn't "it" ambiguous in A and B?
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3635
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 716

Kudos [?]: 5580 [0], given: 322

Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2011, 00:16
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
When there is a pronoun ambiguity in GMAT, one of the best ways of solving the muddle is to apply logic rather than mere structure.

In the given context, there are two eligible contenders for the pronoun’ it’ i.e., Supreme Court and the CIA, but the question is why will Supreme Court award the CIA something in order to enable itself? Isn’t logic missing then? That is the reason to conclude without further doubt that the pronoun refers to the CIA.

_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Status: It's "Go" Time.......
Affiliations: N.C.C.
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 183
Location: India
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 2

Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 05:50
The Answer is "A" but one must say that it has messy choices .I mean "It" in the underline portion may either refer to supreme court or to CIA!
fanatico wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

_________________

We are twice armed if we fight with faith.

He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.

Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 39
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.83
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 26

Re: By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2015, 02:37
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
IMO - A

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.

Let's re-write this sentence for more clarity : The Central Intelligence Agency broad was awarded discretionary powers by the Supreme Court, enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.. Here 'it' refers back to 'The Central Intelligence Agency', not to anyone else.

(A) enabling it to withhold from the public >> this is a cause & effect scenario: V-ing (enabling) is correctly producing the effect of the cause (awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers). And 'it' is referring back to the CIA (closest noun indeed)

(B) for it to withhold from the public >> this is changing the meaning. Now, it is sounding as if SC awarded the DP to CIAB just to enable it to withhold.....so, nonsensical

(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of >> As per VAN rule (Verb>Adj>Noun), using 'withhold' (verb) is preferred over 'withholding' (noun). Also, this is changing the meaning as explained in B.

(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure >> them is incorrect pronoun. Referring to whom??

(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of >> they is incorrect pronoun. Referring to whom??
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1402
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 813

Re: By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2015, 00:43
fanatico wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

regarding choice b,
i realy do not know why it is wrong. this meaning is logic though can be considered distorted meaning.

for it to withhold modifies the preceding clause and is good. but if we use "enabling" modifying "power", the meaning relation is tighter.

we need more discussion on this point.
Intern
Status: Do or Die!!
Joined: 29 Jul 2013
Posts: 24
Location: India
Concentration: Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 3.86
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 30

Re: By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2015, 06:10
I was confused between A and B.
Chose A over B because B looked awkward to me...
for it to withhold...

the act enabled the intelligence agency to withhold seems more correct
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1402
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 813

Re: By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2015, 17:45
fanatico wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

"for it to withold" modify the main clause, not "power". this is why B is wrong
Re: By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central   [#permalink] 02 Jul 2015, 17:45
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central 2 10 May 2010, 01:21
By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central 3 01 Feb 2010, 09:42
1 By a vote of 9 to 0,the Supreme Court awarded the Central 6 23 Jul 2008, 02:01
By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central 1 19 Jul 2007, 22:35
By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central 6 25 Jun 2007, 16:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by