Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Aug 2014, 01:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 761
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2006, 10:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new town hall so large that only St. Peter’s in Rome, the Escorial in Spain, and the Palazza Ducale in Venice could rival it for scale or magnificence.

(A) could rival it for
(B) were the rivals of it in their
(C) were its rival as to
(D) could be its rivals in their
(E) were rivaling its
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2006, 12:00
Definitely b/w A and D

were shows certainty, but we don't know for the fact whether those buildings were the rivals -> "could" is better.

I think D is kind of akward in that it has IT and THEIR... SCALE OR SIGNIFICANCE should have ITS -> ITS SCALE or ITS MAGNIFICIENCE

A is clear, because IT could only refer to a building
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2006, 12:19
Can anyone explain why C is wrong?

SO as to

Just because passive..
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2006, 12:26
baski6 wrote:
Can anyone explain why C is wrong?

SO as to

Just because passive..


were ITS rival??? It seems like there was more than 1 rival... there were 3 of them and it isn't clear which one.
-> RIVAL here is a NOUN (answer C)

Answer A uses RIVAL as a VERB, that's why it isn't plural "A, B and C could RIVAL it for..."
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: SC: Amsterdam [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2006, 17:27
Professor wrote:
Futuristic wrote:
By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new town hall so large that only St. Peter’s in Rome, the Escorial in Spain, and the Palazza Ducale in Venice could rival it for scale or magnificence.

(A) could rival it for
(B) were the rivals of it in their
(C) were its rival as to
(D) could be its rivals in their
(E) were rivaling its


A. "rival for" is correct expression.


Another attack point, the sentence needs the potential modal "could" to complete the comparison.

Ex: Only Ross Powers could rival Shawn Green in the halfpipe competition.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2006, 09:03
GMATT73, thats a cool explanation :-D
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

  [#permalink] 25 Aug 2006, 09:03
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new sidbidus 3 04 Jul 2007, 08:17
2 By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new Notmykind 7 25 Mar 2007, 08:45
By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new vivek123 5 05 Dec 2005, 09:48
By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new ashkg 0 16 Jun 2005, 16:20
By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new Paul 11 22 Sep 2004, 11:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

By the mid-seventeenth century, Amsterdam had built a new

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.