Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 13:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 209
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 44

CAT Tests
Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2012, 23:13
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

70% (01:55) correct 30% (00:32) wrong based on 134 sessions
Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable television are a bargain in comparison to “free” television. Remember that “free” television is not really free. It is consumers, in the end, who pay for the costly advertising that supports “free” television.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the position of the cable-television spokesperson?
(A) Consumers who do not own television sets are less likely to be influenced in their purchasing decisions by television advertising than are consumers who own television sets.
(B) Subscriptions to cable television include access to some public-television channels, which do not accept advertising.
(C) For locations with poor television reception, cable television provides picture quality superior to that provided by free television.
(D) There is as much advertising on many cable-television channels as there is on “free” television channels.
(E) Cable-television subscribers can choose which channels they wish to receive, and the fees vary accordingly.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 60 [2] , given: 14

Re: Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable televi [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2012, 23:33
2
This post received
KUDOS
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable television are a bargain in comparison to “free” television. Remember that “free” television is not really free. It is consumers, in the end, who pay for the costly advertising that supports “free” television.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the position of the cable-television spokesperson?
(A) Consumers who do not own television sets are less likely to be influenced in their purchasing decisions by television advertising than are consumers who own television sets.
(B) Subscriptions to cable television include access to some public-television channels, which do not accept advertising.
(C) For locations with poor television reception, cable television provides picture quality superior to that provided by free television.
(D) There is as much advertising on many cable-television channels as there is on “free” television channels.
(E) Cable-television subscribers can choose which channels they wish to receive, and the fees vary accordingly.



Hi,

Here's the approach:

Premise: Advertisements support 'free' television. Consumers pay for advertisements.

Conclusion: Cable televisions are bargains as compared to 'free' television.

Assumption: The cable televisions are supposed to be advertisement free for them to be attractive to consumers.

Option D directly negates this assumption and hence, undermines the conclusion.

Regards,

Shouvik.
_________________

Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com
admin@edvento.com

1 KUDOS received
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 186 [1] , given: 4

Re: Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable [#permalink] New post 10 Mar 2014, 09:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
HI Deepak,

Let me see if I can try and explain.

I think you've got the consituent parts confused.

The passage is saying:
Cable is cheaper than "free".

Note here there is no comment on better/worse, we're just talking about price

Because 'free' has adverts which are actually paid for by the public

Your option C:
Talks about quality of service. This is irrelevant. The comparison is on price not quality

Correct answer:
Gives a reason why Cable might not be cheaper. It has the same adverts as 'free'. Therefore if you add subscription costs it becomes more expensive.

That makes it correct

Hope that helps

james
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2012
Posts: 104
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 10-22-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable televi [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2012, 02:20
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable television are a bargain in comparison to “free” television. Remember that “free” television is not really free. It is consumers, in the end, who pay for the costly advertising that supports “free” television.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the position of the cable-television spokesperson?
(A) Consumers who do not own television sets are less likely to be influenced in their purchasing decisions by television advertising than are consumers who own television sets.
(B) Subscriptions to cable television include access to some public-television channels, which do not accept advertising.
(C) For locations with poor television reception, cable television provides picture quality superior to that provided by free television.
(D) There is as much advertising on many cable-television channels as there is on “free” television channels.
(E) Cable-television subscribers can choose which channels they wish to receive, and the fees vary accordingly.


IMO D
when you look at other options other than D ..its only D which shows that the two television cable/free have no difference...
rather D equals both of them under the premises on which the cable spokesperson is stating anything.
If the two are made and proved equal then the statment i left with no legs to stand.

I hope I am clear. :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2014, 23:50
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable television are a bargain in comparison to “free” television. Remember that “free” television is not really free. It is consumers, in the end, who pay for the costly advertising that supports “free” television.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the position of the cable-television spokesperson?
(A) Consumers who do not own television sets are less likely to be influenced in their purchasing decisions by television advertising than are consumers who own television sets.
(B) Subscriptions to cable television include access to some public-television channels, which do not accept advertising.
(C) For locations with poor television reception, cable television provides picture quality superior to that provided by free television.
(D) There is as much advertising on many cable-television channels as there is on “free” television channels.
(E) Cable-television subscribers can choose which channels they wish to receive, and the fees vary accordingly.




Conclusion: Cable television is a bargain in comparison to free television, in terms of cost to the consumers.
The total Cost of subscription in cable television + cost of advertisements if any (could be cheap/free) = Total cost of costly advertisements

Assumption : There are no other differences in the benefits provided by cable television and free television.
Possible weakeners : provide differences in cable and free, so that one should be better than other.

POE:

A) Consumers who do not own television sets are likely to be influenced in their purchasing decisions by television advertising that are consumers who own television sets.
<Deepak> OFS : Do not talk compare cable and free television, instead comparing people with television and people without television.

B) Subscriptions to cable television include access to some public-television channels, which do not accept advertising
<Deepak> We do not know if free television is having access to these channels. So we cannot infer anything from this statement.

C) For locations with poor television reception, cable television provides picture quality superior to that provided by free television
<Deepak> This answer choice is providing one instance where cable television is better than free.

D) There is as much advertising on cable-television channels as there is on "free" television channels.
<Deepak> There is no mention of price of advertisements in cable television. The cost of advertising on free channels is high and the cost of advertising on the cable television might be low, keeping the total cost to the consumers same. and so there is no difference between cable television and free television

E) Cable - television subscribers can choose which channels they wish to receive.
<Deepak> No mention of what free television subscribers can do. Cannot decide.

As per me, the answer choice C is a slight weakener. But since it is not the answer, i am confused. Can somebody please help me out.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable [#permalink] New post 10 Mar 2014, 19:57
plumber250 wrote:
HI Deepak,

Let me see if I can try and explain.

I think you've got the consituent parts confused.

The passage is saying:
Cable is cheaper than "free".

Note here there is no comment on better/worse, we're just talking about price

Because 'free' has adverts which are actually paid for by the public

Your option C:
Talks about quality of service. This is irrelevant. The comparison is on price not quality

Correct answer:
Gives a reason why Cable might not be cheaper. It has the same adverts as 'free'. Therefore if you add subscription costs it becomes more expensive.

That makes it correct

Hope that helps

james



Hi James,

Many thanks for the explanation.

One more doubt: it is not mentioned any where that the advertisement in Cable cost the same to public. The advertisements can be much cheaper because they are already charging subscription fee.

In this case we cannot conclusively say anything about that option.
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 4

Re: Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2014, 10:16
Hi,

I think you're rather over analysing.

Remember the question says 'most damage' - so we're not looking for definite proof just a reason for damage.

The answer choice says 'as much' - which implies the two are about the same.

This is more than enough evidence to damage the point of view in the passage.

A general point - GMAT gives you 0 points for being overly clever and post rationalising. This is all about getting the correct answer. Find it and move on.

James
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Re: Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable   [#permalink] 11 Mar 2014, 10:16
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
GMAT club test subscription navaljoshi 0 22 May 2014, 04:50
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Free WSJ or Economist Subscription bb 1 07 Apr 2014, 20:10
Experts publish their posts in the topic Extending Kaplan Qbank subscription anuragbytes 3 15 Nov 2012, 05:41
Subscription Question? futurestrategist 2 16 Feb 2010, 00:26
Railroad spokesperson: Of course it is a difficult task to terp26 6 14 Apr 2008, 10:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to cable

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.