Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 20:58 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 20:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 221 [87]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [14]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618837 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I will go with E as well.

a. Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.
-Just because some of the results are similar we cannot inference that all results are similar.

b. Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.
- This is close. While from the argument it should be true. However we cannot make a blanket stmt for all human beings. There could be other reasons not mentioned in the argument why someone who has reduced calorie intake by atleast 25% could die earlier.

c. Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.
-Insulin level can also increase owing to other reasons not mentioned in the stmt.

d. Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.
-Just because humans are likely to live longer does not gurantee that they will be healthier.

e. Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.
- This is paraphrasing of the stmts already made in the argument and hence can be certainly infrenced.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 159
Own Kudos [?]: 685 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I'll go with (A).

How can it be (E)???

Atleast 25 % does not mean necessarily greater than 25 % ..............may all the subjects reduced their calorie intake by exactly 25%.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 248
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [4]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q51  V38
Send PM
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
sidbidus wrote:
I'll go with (A).

How can it be (E)???

Atleast 25 % does not mean necessarily greater than 25 % ..............may all the subjects reduced their calorie intake by exactly 25%.


But it also says higher the calorie reduction better the results are. Doesnt that mean there were atleast a few people who had reduced their intake by greater than 25%
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 90
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
 Q44  V44
Send PM
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
1
Kudos
trainspotting wrote:
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is known to prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent, demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature, with the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity, partly because an earlier study by other researchers found both traits in long-lived people.

If the above statements are true, they support which of the following inferences?

A. Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.
B. Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.
C. Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.
D. Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.
E. Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.


I think I would go with (E), for it is the least disputable claim. The original info states that everyone reduced C-intake by at least 25%. However, greatest changes resulted with the greatest percentage change in C-intake. This implies that not everyone's C-intake reduction level was the same. & since a intake reduction of less than 25% is impossible, some individuals must have reduced C-intake by more than 25%.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2016
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [0]
Given Kudos: 208
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V47
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.57
Send PM
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
I always get confused between assumption and inference question. And specially in the heat of the examination I make this error continuously. Any lucid explanation or cheat sheet for the same.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 220 [1]
Given Kudos: 630
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Send PM
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
(A) Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice. - INCORRECT
"......prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases."
".....48 moderately overweight people,...., demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature,"

(B) Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so. - INCORRECT
Nothing has been said about people who dont change their diet

(C) Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals. - INCORRECT
"Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories"
Not necessarily, it could be nutrients that helped with insulin levels or a combination of low calorie+high nutrients that helped

(D) Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels. - INCORRECT
"Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity,..."
Longevity is not same as healthy

(E) Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent. - CORRECT
"...who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent..."
"the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake....."
>25% also done by some.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne