Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in cal : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 10:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in cal

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [6] , given: 0

Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in cal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2007, 11:23
6
KUDOS
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is known to prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent, demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature, with the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity, partly because an earlier study by other researchers found both traits in long-lived people.

If the above statements are true, they support which of the following inferences?

(A) Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.

(B) Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.

(C) Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.

(D) Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.

(E) Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 838
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Calorie Restriction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2009, 04:49
E for me

C is not supported
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 431
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 4

Re: CR - Calorie Restriction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2009, 08:28
I'll go with B

c)I don't think this is right because reduced calorie intake may cause lower body temperature, which in turn may cause reduced insulin. This shows it is indirectly related
d)Not correct because this addresses only one condition - lower insulin but not the other condition - lower body temperature
e)Again not right because all the persons in the test group may have reduced the calorie intake by exactly 25%. This statement doesn't contradict any of the conditions in the argument

Between B and A I'll go with B because A talks about increasing the life span by mentioning some diseases. B on the other hand talks only about insulin and body temperature

Will go with B

Cheers,
Unplugged
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 1

Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2009, 23:49
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is known to prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent, demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature, with the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity, partly because an earlier study by other researchers found both traits in long-lived people.

If the above statements are true, they support which of the following inferences?

A. Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.

B. Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.

C. Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.

D. Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.

E. Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.
_________________

Choose Life

Director
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 546
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 92

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2009, 00:39
Confused between C & E
Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 897
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 28

Kudos [?]: 648 [0], given: 18

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2009, 02:31
True. I would go with E.

Why not C >> there is no mention that calorie intake is 'directly' related to lower insulin levels. It might be possible that lower intake reduces metabolism and this in turn causes lower insulin levels.

Why E >> each reduced their calorie intake by atleast 25%. Now it might be possible that all reduced their intake by 'exactly' 25%. But reading further the stem says that there was a variance in insulin based on percentage intake...and hence..some people should have definitely reduced intake by more than 25%, only then comparison is possible.

pm4553 wrote:
Confused between C & E
Manager
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2009, 10:35
trainspotting wrote:
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in calories, is known to prolong the life of rats and mice by preventing heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases. A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent, demonstrated decreases in insulin levels and body temperature, with the greatest decrease observed in individuals with the greatest percentage change in their calorie intake. Low insulin level and body temperature are both considered signs of longevity, partly because an earlier study by other researchers found both traits in long-lived people.

If the above statements are true, they support which of the following inferences?

A. Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.
B. Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.
C. Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.
D. Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.
E. Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.

I think I would go with (E), for it is the least disputable claim. The original info states that everyone reduced C-intake by at least 25%. However, greatest changes resulted with the greatest percentage change in C-intake. This implies that not everyone's C-intake reduction level was the same. & since a intake reduction of less than 25% is impossible, some individuals must have reduced C-intake by more than 25%.
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 1847
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 52

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2009, 08:52
E
A. Calorie restriction produces similar results in humans as it does in rats and mice.
No mention of insulin levels etc. in rats so not very similar

B. Humans who reduce their calorie intake by at least 25 percent on a long-term basis will live longer than they would have had they not done so.
It might be true but not enough evidence

C. Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.
No, i think it is correlated to all individuals and the study never said about not being correlated to thinner people

D. Individuals with low insulin levels are healthier than individuals with high insulin levels.
Maybe.

E. Some individuals in the study reduced their calorie intake by more than 25 percent.
The passage mentioned ind. reducing diet by at least 25% so isn't this just reiterating it?
_________________

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 850
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 310 [0], given: 106

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2009, 09:26
E survives.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2009, 05:47
E is the OA...
_________________

Choose Life

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 954
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1272 [0], given: 40

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2010, 05:22
Confused b/w C and E.

Question is about Inference, an unstated premise, which can be draw from the premises given in the argument. But, E is already mentioned in the argument. So, how can it be the OA?

Now read this - A six-month study of 48 moderately overweight people, who each reduced their calorie intake by at least 25 percent,

C says - Calorie intake is directly correlated to insulin level in moderately overweight individuals.

C is not bringing new elements and its in the context. So, I think this should be the OA.
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 May 2010, 10:30
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 579 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

28 May 2010, 12:32
I will go with (E) because that can be inferred with confidence.
Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2010, 10:28
It means that lower calorie foods are better and safer. It is better for those who really want to reduce weights. Lower calories might really prolong life.
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 166
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 18

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2011, 19:06
will go with E...
_________________

My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own.

If you like my explanations award kudos.

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 707
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 37

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2011, 17:50
E by POE.
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 218
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2011, 05:56
E it is. Others are not supported by the fact in the statements
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2011
Posts: 44
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 11

Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2011, 01:10
E should be the answer since this is the only choice that can inferred from the question without any doubt.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 912
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 73

Kudos [?]: 603 [0], given: 44

Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2011, 02:18
E must be the correct answer as it was mentioned in the passage.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 563
Location: United States
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 16

Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 05:17
I too Vote for E but the option B is tempting me can anyone justify Please.........

_________________

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 9

Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in cal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2013, 01:14
went with E.

I must admit this question had a lot of close calls that can be argued either way!
Re: Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in cal   [#permalink] 22 Jul 2013, 01:14

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 51 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 A low-calorie, low-fat, high-protein diet has been shown to assist in 2 29 Aug 2015, 02:36
CR - Calorie Restriction 0 09 Feb 2009, 08:28
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in 0 22 Sep 2008, 03:12
Calorie restriction, a diet high in nutrients but low in 0 27 Aug 2007, 08:29
The labeling of otherwise high-calorie foods as sugar-free 12 04 Apr 2007, 09:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by