Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 18:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 02:58
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year 16 buildings cab be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

A. ....
B. a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
C. a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
D. every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
E. every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1071
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 03:26
Is it E? May be I am totally wrong.


-D - will indicates absolute certainty. After all they have just calculated.
-C - In think is incorrect because the first part of the sentence needs to be passive. .... 'coz second part "buildings cab be expected to sustain damage from" is passive
A/B - struck every nine year by meteorite is probably incorrect. struck by a meteorite seems better.
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 08:54
E.

We do not know which human being so "a hum..." is fine here. Also should be has little uncertaintity and goes perfectly well with "can be expected". In D will suggest absolute certaintity.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 19
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 09:11
D it is... (altho I got it wrong too the first time)....

'will be' is the correct tense.. moreover 'should' makes it appear as if the author really wants humans to be hit by meteorites!!!
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 587
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 19:59
I would go with D

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year 16 buildings cab be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

A. ....
B. a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
again should
C. a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
Not parallel
D. every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
Parallel and Correct
E. every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite
Though should is for subjunctive, but here should sounds like as it would definetely happen.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1061
Location: CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Canadian Scientists [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 20:18
Its D fo shizzle (quoting Snoop Dogg)

A, B, E are out because no human being 'should be' struck by a meteorite, unless they did something really really bad! :wink:

Somehow C just doesn't flow for me...Also it changes the meaning. It sounds as though the same human being will be struck once every nine years; so he would've gotten struck twice in 18 years ????
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 931
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 20:51
It's between D and E.
I will go with E.
Reason: 'Should' has less probability than 'Will'.

Brajesh
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 482
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Canadian Scientists [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 21:03
Let me try to explain

'"
ps_dahiya wrote:
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year 16 buildings cab be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

A. ....
Sounds like only one human will be struck ... also should is wrong here
B. a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
Should is wrong here becuase scientists are not giving advise.

C. a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
again "one human" is wrong here as explained in A.

D. every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite

This is good

E. every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite

Should is wrong here.



Gyus correct me if I'm wrong
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 286
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 21:06
Bhai wrote:
E.

We do not know which human being so "a hum..." is fine here. Also should be has little uncertaintity and goes perfectly well with "can be expected". In D will suggest absolute certaintity.


Bhai,

this is an ugly SC.


http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... =meteorite


BTW are you considering evening MBA at UoM. ?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1071
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Canadian Scientists [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 22:31
TeHCM wrote:
A, B, E are out because no human being 'should be' struck by a meteorite, unless they did something really really bad! :wink:


TeHCM, you make it look real easy!

I would have chosen D anyday over E, but recently I read in a rather popular SC book that "should" is used to indicate possibility and "will" indicates certainty. What I didn't pay attention to is the next sentence that said "you should check to see if the meaning of the original sentence requires doubt or certainty".

I guess here the scientists have "calculated that X will happen" means that they could have calculated with certainty but it may NOT be correct.
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1061
Location: CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Canadian Scientists [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 22:36
Quote:
I guess here the scientists have "calculated that X will happen"
is the key :wink:
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 51
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2006, 23:44
I vote for D too. Reason:

A. ....
B. a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
Should is too strong.

C. a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
This means one particular human being will be struck once in every 9 years.
D. every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
Correct

E. every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite
Should is again too strong
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Canadian Scientists [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2006, 00:09
TeHCM wrote:
Quote:
I guess here the scientists have "calculated that X will happen"
is the key :wink:


Bulls Eye !!!!!

OA is D.

OE: The verb "should" implies obligation: in this sentence, it indicates that one human being ought to be struck every nine years, as though that person somehow deserved it. The scientists clearly mean that a human being will be struck by a meteorite roughly every nine years.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Re: SC - Canadian Scientists   [#permalink] 25 Jan 2006, 00:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being TehJay 10 29 Sep 2010, 16:41
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being aMante 3 16 Mar 2008, 02:42
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being GMATBLACKBELT 3 17 Sep 2007, 21:02
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being sidbidus 3 04 Jul 2007, 08:19
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being ayushi 10 02 Oct 2006, 08:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.