Carl is clearly an incompetent detective. He has solved a smaller percentage of the cases
assigned to him in the last 3 years—only 1 out of 25—than any other detective on the police
force. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
a) Because the police chief regards Carl as the most capable detective, she assigns him only the
most difficult cases, ones that others have failed to solve.
b) Before he became a detective, Carl was a neighborhood police officer and was highly
respected by the residents of the neighborhood he patrolled.
c) Detectives on the police force on which Carl serves are provided with extensive resources,
including the use of a large computer database, to help them solve crimes.
d) Carl was previously a detective in a police department in another city, and in the 4 years he
spent there, he solved only 1 out of 30 crimes.
e) Many of the officers in the police department in which Carl serves were hired or promoted
within the last 5 years.
Main CR Qs link -
cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
_________________
********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.