Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 16:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1196
Followers: 129

Kudos [?]: 1465 [0], given: 142

Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2013, 01:42
debayan222 wrote:
egmat wrote:
Hi All,

Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so. 1. The function prepositional phrase “for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight” is obscure. It is not clear what is it modifying. It is not placed correctly. 2. Only comma has been used to join two independent clauses. This structure is completely ungrammatical. POE: Choice A: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore: Incorrect for the reasons discussed above. Choice B: When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he: Incorrect. The syntax of this answer choice is not correct the clauses have not been placed at proper places to convey the meaning clearly. Choice C: Since he was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, so Charles Lindbergh: Incorrect. There is no independent clause in the sentence with this choice. Use of “so” is incorrect here. Choice D: Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh: Incorrect. This structure is ungrammatical. If there were a comma instead of “was the reason that”, then the construction would be correct. Choice E: Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh: Correct. “very reluctant” correctly modifies the subject of the Independent clause Charles Lindbergh. Pronoun “he” and “his” also correctly refer to the same subject. Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha Hi Shraddha, I'm not able to understand clearly why B is incorrect here and E is correct ? Could you please come up with a bit detail analysis of this question by digging deep further ? Much appreciate your feedback. P.S : I guess,E doesn't have a sense of the fact that Charles Lindbergh was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane hence refused to carry even a pound of mail.... Hi Shradhha, Any update on this? Could you please come up with a detail meaning analysis and help me understand it... Really appreciate your feedback. _________________  e-GMAT Discount Codes Magoosh Discount Codes Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes e-GMAT Representative Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Posts: 1996 Followers: 2083 Kudos [?]: 7164 [0], given: 267 Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink] ### Show Tags 19 Mar 2013, 07:46 debayan222 wrote: Hi Shraddha, I'm not able to understand clearly why B is incorrect here and E is correct ? Could you please come up with a bit detail analysis of this question by digging deep further ? Much appreciate your feedback. P.S : I guess,E doesn't have a sense of the fact that Charles Lindbergh was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane hence refused to carry even a pound of mail.... Hi Debayan, Choice B: When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he The problem with this choice is that the modifier "being very reluctant..." is placed between two commas. Such placement makes it undlear whether this modifier modifies the preceding noun or the following noun. Here is the scope of ambiguity in modification. Choice E: Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh Here, the modification is absolutely clear. Who is very reluctant? The subject of the following clause Chales Lindbergh. There is no acope of any ambiguity whatsoever in this choice. Hence, this choice is precise and conveys the logical menaing absolutely clearly. Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha _________________ | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com BSchool Forum Moderator Joined: 27 Aug 2012 Posts: 1196 Followers: 129 Kudos [?]: 1465 [0], given: 142 Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink] ### Show Tags 19 Mar 2013, 09:01 egmat wrote: debayan222 wrote: Hi Shraddha, I'm not able to understand clearly why B is incorrect here and E is correct ? Could you please come up with a bit detail analysis of this question by digging deep further ? Much appreciate your feedback. P.S : I guess,E doesn't have a sense of the fact that Charles Lindbergh was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane hence refused to carry even a pound of mail.... Hi Debayan, Choice B: When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he The problem with this choice is that the modifier "being very reluctant..." is placed between two commas. Such placement makes it undlear whether this modifier modifies the preceding noun or the following noun. Here is the scope of ambiguity in modification. Choice E: Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh Here, the modification is absolutely clear. Who is very reluctant? The subject of the following clause Chales Lindbergh. There is no acope of any ambiguity whatsoever in this choice. Hence, this choice is precise and conveys the logical menaing absolutely clearly. Hope this helps. Thanks. Shraddha Hi Shraddha, Thanks for your reply but I'm afraid that it's still not clear to me unfortunately Option E-this option I think, doesn't convey the intended meaning that as the Charles was very reluctant to carry any extra weight...(hence) he refused to carry even a pound of mail.... Option B-in this option "being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane" irrespective of the fact whether it modifies the preceding noun or the following noun, I think clearly conveys the intended meaning that Charles was reluctant to carry any extra weight so he refused to carry even a pound of mail.... Please help! _________________ Manager Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Posts: 81 Schools: IIM Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 11 Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink] ### Show Tags 10 Apr 2013, 02:37 egmat wrote: Hi All, Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered$1,000 to do so.

1. The function prepositional phrase “for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight” is obscure. It is not clear what is it modifying. It is not placed correctly.
2. Only comma has been used to join two independent clauses. This structure is completely ungrammatical.

POE:

Choice A: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore: Incorrect for the reasons discussed above.

Choice B: When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he: Incorrect. The syntax of this answer choice is not correct the clauses have not been placed at proper places to convey the meaning clearly.

Choice C: Since he was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, so Charles Lindbergh: Incorrect. There is no independent clause in the sentence with this choice. Use of “so” is incorrect here.

Choice D: Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh: Incorrect. This structure is ungrammatical. If there were a comma instead of “was the reason that”, then the construction would be correct.

Choice E: Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh: Correct. “very reluctant” correctly modifies the subject of the Independent clause Charles Lindbergh. Pronoun “he” and “his” also correctly refer to the same subject.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.

In option E, "Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight" is a dependent clause and "Charles Lindbergh refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so" is an independent clause. I think so as in the 1st clause "Very ........flight", the word "when" is a dependent clause marker. Manager Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 118 Location: United States WE: Consulting (Telecommunications) Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 49 [3] , given: 44 Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink] ### Show Tags 25 Apr 2013, 22:00 3 This post received KUDOS There are two key things one should understand to answer this questions: 1) The modifier "reluctant to carry even a pound of extra weight" is a necessary modifier, meaning this is essential part of the sentence but not there to provide extra information. 2) The modifier "despite being offered$1000 to do so" should modify Charles not anything else.

Coming to the choices:

Original sentence is wrong. Need not discuss why.

Choice B is wrong because it changes the intended meaning of the sentence by violating 1 above. By placing the modifier 1 (above) after a comma, the choice wrongly implies that there is no correlation between "going on a solo transatlantic flight" and "being reluctant to carry extra weight" which is wrong as it changes the intended meaning.

Choice C has redundancy error Since.....so is a wrong construction.

Choice D is wrong because it violates 2 above. "Being very reluctant....was the reason....., despite being offered $1000 to do so". "Being very reluctant to carry" cannot be offered$1000.

Choice E takes care of both 1 and 2 highlighted above. Right
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10537
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2014, 04:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Apr 2014
Posts: 128
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q51 V27
GMAT 3: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 4: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 5: 760 Q50 V42
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 17

Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 May 2015, 00:06
egmat wrote:
Hi All,

Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered \$1,000 to do so.

1. The function prepositional phrase “for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight” is obscure. It is not clear what is it modifying. It is not placed correctly.
2. Only comma has been used to join two independent clauses. This structure is completely ungrammatical.

POE:

Choice A: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore: Incorrect for the reasons discussed above.

Choice B: When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he: Incorrect. The syntax of this answer choice is not correct the clauses have not been placed at proper places to convey the meaning clearly.

Choice C: Since he was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, so Charles Lindbergh: Incorrect. There is no independent clause in the sentence with this choice. Use of “so” is incorrect here.

Choice D: Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh: Incorrect. This structure is ungrammatical. If there were a comma instead of “was the reason that”, then the construction would be correct.

Choice E: Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh: Correct. “very reluctant” correctly modifies the subject of the Independent clause Charles Lindbergh. Pronoun “he” and “his” also correctly refer to the same subject.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.

According to e-GMAT's SC course, the correct answer has to convey the intended meaning of the original sentence. Here, the original sentence indicates that "being very relectant to...." is the reason why Charles Lindbergh refused to carry... But in choice E, we do not see this relation. In choice E, the "reluctant" thing only becomes a modifier to Charles Lindbergh, and there is no reason for the "refused" thing.
I think choice D, though wordy, is the correct answer.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1996
Followers: 2083

Kudos [?]: 7164 [0], given: 267

Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2015, 23:19
tronghieu1987 wrote:

According to e-GMAT's SC course, the correct answer has to convey the intended meaning of the original sentence. Here, the original sentence indicates that "being very relectant to...." is the reason why Charles Lindbergh refused to carry... But in choice E, we do not see this relation. In choice E, the "reluctant" thing only becomes a modifier to Charles Lindbergh, and there is no reason for the "refused" thing.
I think choice D, though wordy, is the correct answer.

Hi tronghieu1987,

Thanks for posting your doubt here.

The context of the sentence is such hat it makes it absolutely clear that Charles Lindbergh refused to carry even a pound of mail because he was reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane. Even though this sentence does not use any "reason" word., the context makes it absolutely clear.

Also, this is an officially correct answer that is always correct. We should not doubt them. rather we should learn new usages from them.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
SJ
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10537
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2016, 21:35
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2016, 21:35

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 In reaction to King Charles I's attempt to arrest five 7 26 Jun 2013, 12:44
1 In celebrating Charles A. Lindberghs epic flight in the 7 18 Oct 2010, 21:30
2 Hubert Humphrey's attempt in his campaign to dissociate 5 07 Jul 2008, 17:56
1 If charles had spent half as much time attending his classes 13 30 Apr 2008, 15:16
Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic 9 13 Mar 2008, 20:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by