Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 15:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Chris will have a great future as a lawyer. In high school,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 63
Location: NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Chris will have a great future as a lawyer. In high school, [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2005, 14:50
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Chris will have a great future as a lawyer. In high school, he won all the debate competitions he participated in.

Which of the following can be said about the above claim?

A.The veracity of the claim is doubtful because it is based on an incorrect analogy
B.The claim is ambiguous, as there is a shifting in the meaning of the terms
C.The above argument obtains its strength from a similarity of two compared situations
D.The two statements are logically inconsistent with each other
E.The claim is built upon a concealed assumption.

Last edited by Marina on 13 Feb 2005, 18:31, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2005, 17:12
Wierd question.

I can think of (E)

Underlying assumption could be that
anyone who is good at debates has a great future a lawyer.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2005, 17:32
(E) is best of the lot.

Rest all goes too beyond.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2005, 17:48
Is there a typo in this question? -- Is it 'had a great future' because he was great in debates in highschool?. This seems illogical to me.

So, pick D. Someone can have a great future ahead of themselves, but not sure of 'had a great future'. Although my reasoning here is more like an SC's than a CR's.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 63
Location: NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2005, 18:35
prep_gmat wrote:
Is there a typo in this question? -- Is it 'had a great future' because he was great in debates in highschool?. This seems illogical to me.

So, pick D. Someone can have a great future ahead of themselves, but not sure of 'had a great future'. Although my reasoning here is more like an SC's than a CR's.


Thank you, prep_gmat. Yes, it was a typo and I corrected it, the sentence should be "will have a great future" and not "had a great future" as I posted first. Sorry about any confusions... :oops:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2005, 19:14
No Problem Marina. Thanks for promptly editing the q.

Regarding E, aren't all assumptions concealed in GMAT CR parlance?, so i think that makes choice E a bit too generic.

C, to me seems a bit more specific and some what relevant. I know that the connection in the stem is not real 'strong', but whatever the degree of the strength, the claim derives its strength from the similarity between debating and being a lawyer i guess.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-from Crack-GMAT [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2005, 20:31
This one is very strange. E can definitely "be said", I would say. The asumption is that anybody who won all debates the he/she participated in can be a good lawyer.

Now look at the other ones:
A. Veracity of the claim is doubtful, definitely. Is it based on an analogy? From lawyer to debate? Definitely incorrect. I don't know if you'd call it an analogy though?
B. Don't think there is any shifting in meanings for terms, unless he was thinking about debate for a lawyer? :???
C. Definitely wrong
D. Can't really say that.

So I'd have to say E, unless it could be A?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 561
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-from Crack-GMAT [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2005, 04:29
Marina wrote:
Chris will have a great future as a lawyer. In high school, he won all the debate competitions he participated in.

Which of the following can be said about the above claim?

A.The veracity of the claim is doubtful because it is based on an incorrect analogy
B.The claim is ambiguous, as there is a shifting in the meaning of the terms
C.The above argument obtains its strength from a similarity of two compared situations
D.The two statements are logically inconsistent with each other
E.The claim is built upon a concealed assumption.


My thoughts:

A.The veracity of the claim is doubtful because it is based on an incorrect analogy
What if the analogy is correct? (wrong)

B.The claim is ambiguous, as there is a shifting in the meaning of the terms
Fallacy of Equivocation? we cannot prove that an actual shift exists since we cannot define the actual meanings of each term (lawyer vs good debator) (wrong)

C.The above argument obtains its strength from a similarity of two compared situations
Are the two situations actually similar? What if they are not? (Wrong).

D.The two statements are logically inconsistent with each other
We can't prove this. Afterall they may be consistent, but we don't care. (Wrong)

E.The claim is built upon a concealed assumption.[/quote]
My first choice, but it's generic!

OA ps.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 63
Location: NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2005, 08:27
OA is E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 63
Location: NYC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2005, 08:29
I did not like this question as well not to mention I answered it wrong (I chose C). I posted it to get your opinion on it :wink:
  [#permalink] 14 Feb 2005, 08:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Review - Lawyer to B-school JackDaniels 3 10 Dec 2012, 15:17
1 The local high school students have been clamoring for the kingb 6 21 Oct 2012, 13:44
Experts publish their posts in the topic 94) Chris and Emma will represent Don Bosco School in the imaggic 9 17 Nov 2011, 22:24
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Three children, Alice, Brian, and Chris have a total of bschool83 5 24 Jul 2011, 14:30
3 Lawyers and B-School boredlawyer 7 24 Apr 2008, 10:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Chris will have a great future as a lawyer. In high school,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.