Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 01:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 381
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 07:34
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:01) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because doing so served the interests of powerful foreign companies.
Principle: In order for a change to be explained by the advantage some person or group gained from it, it must be shown how the interests of the person or group played a role in bringing about the change.
Which one of the following, if true, can most logically serve as a premise for an argument that uses the principle to counter the claim?

A. Foreign companies did benefit when Country X lowered tariff barriers, but consumers in Country X benefited just as much.

B. In the period since tariff barriers were lowered, price competition among importers has severely limited importers profits from selling foreign companies products in Country X.

C. It was impossible to predict how Country Xs economic reforms, which included lowering tariff barriers, would affect the economy in the short term.

D. Many of the foreign companies that benefited from Country Xs lowering tariff barriers compete fiercely among themselves both in Country X and in other markets.

E. Although foreign companies benefited when Country X lowered tariff barriers, there is no other evidence that these foreign companies induced the change.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1898
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

Re: CR --- tariff barriers [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 07:46
mailtheguru wrote:
Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because doing so served the interests of powerful foreign companies.
Principle: In order for a change to be explained by the advantage some person or group gained from it, it must be shown how the interests of the person or group played a role in bringing about the change.
Which one of the following, if true, can most logically serve as a premise for an argument that uses the principle to counter the claim?


E. Although foreign companies benefited when Country X lowered tariff barriers, there is no other evidence that these foreign companies induced the change.



The principle's point: in order to be qualified for some advantage brought out by a change, the entity must be the one who induces that change.

--->The principle counters the claim by assuming what E is about.

E it is.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 07:53
I too will go with E.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 39
Location: LA California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 13:37
Vote for E
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 13:37
Mine is E
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Nebraska
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 13:43
E is my answer
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 85
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 16:36
Another one for E.

Claim: tarriff barriers were lowered to serve the interests of foreign companies

Principle: To justify a change that would serve the interests of a group, it needs to be shown that the group's interest necessitated the change.

E says that there is no evidence to support the claim that the interests of foreign companies induced the lowering of tarriffs. Hence this premise supports the principle to counter the claim.
_________________

Try and try until you succeed! There is just no giving up!

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2006, 17:38
E looks good.
  [#permalink] 05 Oct 2006, 17:38
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
16 Experts publish their posts in the topic Last year, the government of country A imposed large tariffs JusTLucK04 10 01 Apr 2014, 11:55
15 Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear joshnsit 12 07 Jul 2012, 16:57
1 Recent moves to lower the tariff on Spring lamb imported bschool83 15 31 Jul 2011, 12:00
Lowering entry barriers that foreign investors face in Praetorian 8 02 Jul 2006, 14:40
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear ronybtl 4 01 Aug 2005, 07:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.