Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 May 2013, 20:20
Customize  |  Hide

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 331
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2008, 15:34
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.

Please explain why the "bold portion" is wrong. I think I have an idea but would like more perspectives.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 523
Schools: Wharton
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: sc: classical Guitat [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2008, 16:48
x97agarwal wrote:
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.

Please explain why the "bold portion" is wrong. I think I have an idea but would like more perspectives.


The bold portion is modifying classical guitar in that sentence, not andres segovia.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 1003
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: sc: classical Guitat [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2008, 17:15
Having Been is incorrectly used here - the action (won over) happened in the past, and does not carry itself into the present or future.

Use "have been" when an action occurred in the past, and continues into the present or future.

The simple past "he was won over" is sufficient.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 196
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: sc: classical Guitat [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2008, 06:21
Segovia, not classical guitar, must be modified by the bold section. In that section "its" is near sound, not near instrument. I think that the instrument is obscur, not its sound. However, this "its" is ambiguous.
Re: sc: classical Guitat   [#permalink] 12 Aug 2008, 06:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often buckkitty 15 08 Jan 2007, 19:25
New posts Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often bsd_lover 8 11 May 2008, 00:09
Popular new posts Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often vscid 10 09 Mar 2010, 04:48
New posts Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often garimavyas 5 08 Mar 2011, 01:42
New posts 1 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often Aristocrat 3 07 Jan 2013, 08:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.