Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 15 Apr 2014, 23:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2011, 11:01
D
Director
Director
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 7

Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 08 Jan 2012, 07:43
I chose (C) for the following reasons:

- The hypothesis for which we have to find support is that the treatise was produced in 1148
- To produce a treatise, someone has to write it and the writing takes time
- If writing the treatise was very time-consuming (say it took several months to produce one page), even it the fourth author started to write in 1148, he couldn't have finished it

What's wrong with this logic?

Also, I still don't understand what's wrong with vannbj's logic?

Quote:
How can we assume that the disruption was due to the plague? Also how does the occurrence of the letter in 1148 relate to the timing of the treatise? Even if there was one 1 outbreak in the 1100’s couldn’t the fourth copyist have produced them 60 years apart?


Anyone?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2012, 01:46
+1 for D
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
Status: And the Prep starts again...
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Posts: 139
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [2] , given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2012, 23:04
2
This post received
KUDOS
Found the logic below in a different forum and I felt the explanation was great..

There seems to be a causal relationship involved...the argument says that there was a disruption that interfered with the copying of the Codex...then it proceeds to say that there was a letter from the 4th copyist about a plague in 1148(which happens to be the disruption) and this plague(disruption) caused the Codex to be produced that year.

Cause: Plague of 1148 (C)
Effect Delayed the Codex to be produced that year. (E)

C->E

Remember that in a causal relationship the author assumes that no other cause is responsible for the Effect. And he assures us that this cause is very much true(here he states that there was some significant disruption that caused the delay in produce - the plague of 1148).

Following this, we need to Strengthen the authors assumptions about his causal relationship by either:
1) showing C causes E
2) Eliminating other Causes
3) Eliminating reverse causality
4) Showing data used to make causality is accurate
5) if there is no cause then there is no effect.

Answer choice D properly demonstrates rule 2 "Eliminating other Causes"...if this was not the only plague then perhaps a later plague further delayed the Codex produce ...hope this helps...

(This question is particularly difficult because the causal relationship is difficult to spot, but you can try to do so by looking for Causal identifiers like "Since....<this>"..."therefore <this>")
_________________

My First Blog on my GMAT Journey

Arise, Awake and Stop not till the goal is reached

Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 196
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2012, 03:37
Note that in a causal relationship the author assumes that no other cause is responsible for the Effect.Its easy to identify this relationship in the given context. Cause and effect are clear, and we can get the answer from that..
Cheers..!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 37
Location: Canada
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
GPA: 3.78
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 55

GMAT Tests User
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2012, 10:42
gurpreet07 wrote:
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman medical treatise, is undated but contains clues to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists, which indicates some significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148, Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced in 1148?

(A) Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no known samples of the handwriting of the first three copyists.
(B) According to the account by the fourth copyist, the plague went on for 10 months.
(C) A scribe would be able to copy a page of text the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.
(D) There was only one outbreak of plague in Florence in the 1100s.
(E) The number of pages of Codex Berinensis produced by a single scribe becomes smaller with each successive change of copyist


This is a very tricky question. I got the correct answer in <2 minutes using the process of elimination, but it was mostly a "feeling" that option D is the right answer. So, I spent a lot of time on trying to decipher it. Here are my thoughts. Hope it helps others get it, and I also hope someone will correct me if my thinking is wrong.

Conclusion: Codex Berinensis (hereby referred to as CB) was probably produced in 1148.
How did we reach this conclusion?
1. Guy 1 copied the first 80 pages --> disruption --> 10 pages by guy 2 --> disruption --> 10 pages by guy 3 --> disruption --> completed by guy 4.
2. Guy 4 also wrote a letter that mentions about a plague in 1148. It's tricky to know for sure if Guy 4 wrote this letter in the actual CB or just wrote the letter to someone. The first sentence "contains clues to when it was produced" is ambiguous in its meaning.

The final sentence can be summed up as: Because letter by Guy 4 mentions plague --> CB produced in 1148.
That's a huge jump. How does a letter written about a plague lead to the conclusion that the CB was produced in 1148?
Only if the plague played a role in producing the CB!

Now, this becomes easy. All we have to prove is that there was no other plague (other than the one that took place in 1148) that could have played a role in producing the CB.
In other words, what we're trying to support is that the CB was produced in 1148 and NOT BEFORE then. This is critical. I also fell into the trap of thinking: why can't the fourth guy have finished his work in 1180? But that's the wrong direction to think in.

I personally didn't buy into the fact that the plague was what caused the disruption for the first 3 guys in copying the CB. Maybe they moved, maybe they got another job, maybe they became disinterested in a repetitive and boring job. But it's not out of order to think that the plague caused the disruption. Who knows? All I have to prove is that the plague is 1148 played in role in producing the CB, and that it was no other plague. Option D does that.

Major Takeaways
- parsing out the truly unnecessary from the necessary. Once you understand what the argument is, and how it's made, the whole thing falls into place. Once I understood that the only thing I REALLY have to prove/support is that the plague of 1148 played a role in producing the CB, the rest became easy.
- I should have paid more attention to the last sentence and identified the jump in logic it was making. This took the longest time. Don't fight the jumps in logic with confusion and immediately jump to the answer choices.
- USE your confusion as the hole that you have to pour cement into.

Great question! Really haven't been challenged by a Strengthen question like this before.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: GMAT_Hound
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 326
Location: India
Concentration: Statistics, International Business
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-02-2013
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 32

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2013, 10:05
Expert's post
Negeting the arguement is the only way to solve this tricky number
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 691
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 229

Premium Member
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2013, 21:38
I don't get the point here. We are in habit of taking premises as true and thus we can't challenge premises. However, in this question and OA the premise has been challenged.

Here is the first look,

Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148,
Conclusion:Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

So When it is already mentioned that Plague happened to be in 1148 then what is the reason to speculate another plague.

Furthermore, had it been that a plague would have occurred before 1148 , still the writer mentioned a plague IN 1148 and then the book should have been completed by then.

Plz advise
_________________

_____________________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
Race Starts again
VeritasPrep 700
GMATPrep#1 650
GMATPrep#2 710

_____________________________________________________________________________

Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2013
Posts: 1
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Research (Investment Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2013, 04:42
I chose C because

: if a scribe can produce one page in a day, then the book would have taken only 80 days so must have been written around the same time as the fourth author who mentions 1148
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman   [#permalink] 04 Oct 2013, 04:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient roman karlfurt 7 09 Oct 2006, 13:29
Popular new posts 1 Experts publish their posts in the topic SC - Ancient Romans found it therapeutic seekmba 12 23 Mar 2010, 10:38
Popular new posts 1 Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman rlevochkin 11 12 Aug 2010, 09:02
New posts Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient roman imhimanshu 1 21 Aug 2012, 04:41
New posts 4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman hb 5 10 Feb 2013, 09:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.