Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:16 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 397 [41]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 3379 [8]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92915
Own Kudos [?]: 619017 [3]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 May 2018
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: Hungary
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
I understand option D. But how do you eliminate answer choice A. Negating A : Anyone who relies on movie and electronic media is able to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen. Doesn't this weaken the argument??
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63668 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
mallya12 wrote:
I understand option D. But how do you eliminate answer choice A. Negating A : Anyone who relies on movie and electronic media is able to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen. Doesn't this weaken the argument??

The question asks us which answer choice is "an assumption on which the columnist’s argument depends," which is different than an answer choice that, if negated, would weaken the argument. An assumption on which the argument depends MUST be true in order for the conclusion to follow logically from the evidence in the passage.

The columnist concludes that "widespread reliance on movies and electronic media for entertainment has an inherently corrosive effect on democracy."

His/her evidence for this conclusion is as follows:
  • A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have established strong bonds of mutual trust
  • Such bonds are formed and strengthened only by participation in civic organizations, political parties, and other groups outside the family.

Take another look at (A):
Quote:
(A) Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is unable to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen.

The key to eliminating this answer choice is the word "anyone."

The conclusion states that "widespread reliance on movies and electronic media for entertainment has an inherently corrosive effect on democracy." This just means that the overall effect of widespread reliance on movies/electronic media is corrosive to democracy. The conclusion would still be valid if, say, a large majority of people who use movies/electronic media are unable to form bonds of trust, even if a small number of movie watchers/electronic media users are able to form such bonds.

The argument does not require "anyone" who relies on movies/electronic media to be unable to form a strong bond of mutual support. Because this statement does not absolutely have to be true in order for the conclusion to be logically sound, answer choice (A) is not an assumption on which the argument depends.

I hope that helps!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 May 2017
Status:Discipline & Consistency always beats talent
Posts: 146
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [0]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States (CA)
GPA: 3.59
WE:Sales (Retail)
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
Quote:
I understand option D. But how do you eliminate answer choice A. Negating A : Anyone who relies on movie and electronic media is able to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen. Doesn't this weaken the argument??

A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have established strong bonds of mutual trust.
It is obvious then that widespread reliance on movies and electronic media for entertainment has an inherently corrosive effect on democracy.

Quote:
(A) Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is unable to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen

If you read this again closely, this answer choice asserts that "Unable to form a strong bond" is certain. The conclusion, however, states "inherently corrosive effect". The language of the two are subtle but (A) is to the extreme while the conclusion is to a possibility.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Aug 2017
Posts: 96
Own Kudos [?]: 200 [0]
Given Kudos: 174
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
GMATNinja

What does option E mean?
People who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment are generally closer to their families than are those who do not.

People who are not relying on movies and electronic media are closer to families of not?
We only know that people do not watch movies, but can we properly infer that they are also not closer to their families?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63668 [0]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
Expert Reply
uchihaitachi wrote:
GMATNinja

What does option E mean?
People who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment are generally closer to their families than are those who do not.

People who are not relying on movies and electronic media are closer to families of not?
We only know that people do not watch movies, but can we properly infer that they are also not closer to their families?

To make sense of (E), we should really look at it as part of the overall question. So, let's take a look at the passage first.

We're told that:
  • A democratic society needs its citizens to have established strong bonds of mutual trust for it to survive
  • These bonds are formed by participating in groups outside the family

These two points are used as evidence to support the passage's conclusion: the reliance on electronic media for entertainment has an "inherently corrosive effect on democracy."

This question asks us which of the answer choices is an assumption on which the columnist’s argument depends. If the argument depends on an assumption, then the assumption is necessary to reach the conclusion from the evidence provided. If the answer choice is correct, then it would not be possible for the conclusion to logically follow from the evidence without it.

(E) tells us:
Quote:
(E) People who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment are generally closer to their families than are those who do not.

In (E), we're comparing two groups of people: the first group rely on movies and electronic media for their entertainment, the second group entertains themselves in a different way -- we aren't told what that different way is.

Also, there is some amount of closeness that everyone feels towards their own family. People in the first group will have a higher level of closeness to their own family than the level of closeness felt towards their own family by people in the second group.

We're looking for an assumption required to conclude that electronic media has an "inherently corrosive effect on democracy," because it prevents bonds being formed by people participating in groups outside their family. Knowing about the strength of the bond between family members is not an assumption that's required for this argument. This is why (E) is not the correct answer to this question.

Compare this to (D):
Quote:
(D) Relying on movies and electronic media for entertainment generally makes people less likely to participate in groups outside their families.

The columnist says people participating in groups outside their families is necessary for democracy to survive. This participation develops the "strong bonds of mutual trust" required to maintain a democracy.

If relying on movies and electronic media had no effect on whether people participate in groups outside their families then the reliance on this media for entertainment would not have a corrosive effect on democracy. If (D) is true then people who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment will be less likely to participate in groups outside their families. This means they will be less likely to develop the "strong bonds of mutual trust" required to maintain a democracy, and the passage's conclusion follows from the evidence.

(D) is necessary for this argument to be effective, so (D) is the answer to this question.

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2020
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [2]
Given Kudos: 125
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Hi, I think your reasoning is wrong, although the answer is correct.

"Anyone" is not the key word here. Anyone infact means 100% here, it is more like out of a group of 100 people, you can choose anyone, and the assumption, i.e., they will not be able to form a bond with any citizen because of movies, will still hold true.

I think the contentious word here is "Citizen" instead.

Please find my reasoning below:-

Conclusion: Reliance on movies is detrimental to democracy
Premise: Participation in democratic institutions to develop trust with people outside of "family" is imp for democracy
Gap: Causal relationship between how movies are inhibiting participation in democratic institutions, and in turn, trust development with people outside of "family"

Answer Choice A: Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is unable to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen
Negated Answer Choice A: Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is able to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen - [color=#ffff00]"citizen" here could be 1 -> "family" or 2 ->"people outside family" [/color]
If 1. - [color=#ff0000]conclusion still holds true
If 2. - conclusion breaks[/color]

Since, this is an assumption, this must break the conclusion when it is true.


GMATNinja wrote:
mallya12 wrote:
I understand option D. But how do you eliminate answer choice A. Negating A : Anyone who relies on movie and electronic media is able to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen. Doesn't this weaken the argument??

The question asks us which answer choice is "an assumption on which the columnist’s argument depends," which is different than an answer choice that, if negated, would weaken the argument. An assumption on which the argument depends MUST be true in order for the conclusion to follow logically from the evidence in the passage.

The columnist concludes that "widespread reliance on movies and electronic media for entertainment has an inherently corrosive effect on democracy."

His/her evidence for this conclusion is as follows:
  • A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have established strong bonds of mutual trust
  • Such bonds are formed and strengthened only by participation in civic organizations, political parties, and other groups outside the family.

Take another look at (A):
Quote:
(A) Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is unable to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen.

The key to eliminating this answer choice is the word "anyone."

The conclusion states that "widespread reliance on movies and electronic media for entertainment has an inherently corrosive effect on democracy." This just means that the overall effect of widespread reliance on movies/electronic media is corrosive to democracy. The conclusion would still be valid if, say, a large majority of people who use movies/electronic media are unable to form bonds of trust, even if a small number of movie watchers/electronic media users are able to form such bonds.

The argument does not require "anyone" who relies on movies/electronic media to be unable to form a strong bond of mutual support. Because this statement does not absolutely have to be true in order for the conclusion to be logically sound, answer choice (A) is not an assumption on which the argument depends.

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2022
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [0]
Given Kudos: 174
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
bholakc wrote:
Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have established strong bonds of mutual trust. Such bonds are formed and strengthened only by participation in civic organizations, political parties, and other groups outside the family. It is obvious then that widespread reliance on movies and electronic media for entertainment has an inherently corrosive effect on democracy.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the columnist’s argument depends?


(A) Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is unable to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen.

(B) Civic organizations cannot usefully advance their goals by using electronic media.

(C) Newspapers and other forms of print media strengthen, rather than weaken, democratic institutions.

(D) Relying on movies and electronic media for entertainment generally makes people less likely to participate in groups outside their families.

(E) People who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment are generally closer to their families than are those who do not.



1. A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have established strong bonds of mutual trust.
So they need bonds of mutual trust. But that is the necessary condition, not the only one. It is possible that they form bonds but still democratic society does not exist for some other reason.
2. Such bonds are formed and strengthened only by participation in civic organizations, political parties, and other groups outside the family.
This is the only condition to form such bonds. So participation is necessary. That is why the correct answer must contain this condition.

Please feel free to correct if I am missing something.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2554
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have established strong bonds of mutual trust. Such bonds are formed and strengthened only by participation in civic organizations, political parties, and other groups outside the family. It is obvious then that widespread reliance on movies and electronic media for entertainment has an inherently corrosive effect on democracy.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the columnist’s argument depends?

(A) Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is unable to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen. - WRONG. Only thing wrong about this is that it's on extreme side i.e. 'anyone'. Otherwise, if negated it destroys the conclusion.

(B) Civic organizations cannot usefully advance their goals by using electronic media. - WRONG. Not inferable forget about it being an assumption.

(C) Newspapers and other forms of print media strengthen, rather than weaken, democratic institutions. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(D) Relying on movies and electronic media for entertainment generally makes people less likely to participate in groups outside their families. - CORRECT. Catches the desired aspect that leads to the conclusion.

(E) People who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment are generally closer to their families than are those who do not. - WRONG. Two things are wrong with this - close to family and a comparison on that front. Both are not ascertainable.

Answer D.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17220
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its citizens have [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne