uchihaitachi wrote:
GMATNinjaWhat does option E mean?
People who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment are generally closer to their families than are those who do not.
People who are not relying on movies and electronic media are closer to families of not?
We only know that people do not watch movies, but can we properly infer that they are also not closer to their families?
To make sense of (E), we should really look at it as part of the overall question. So, let's take a look at the passage first.
We're told that:
- A democratic society needs its citizens to have established strong bonds of mutual trust for it to survive
- These bonds are formed by participating in groups outside the family
These two points are used as evidence to support the passage's conclusion: the reliance on electronic media for entertainment has an
"inherently corrosive effect on democracy."This question asks us which of the answer choices is an assumption on which the columnist’s argument depends. If the argument
depends on an assumption, then the assumption is
necessary to reach the conclusion from the evidence provided. If the answer choice is correct, then it would not be possible for the conclusion to logically follow from the evidence without it.
(E) tells us:
Quote:
(E) People who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment are generally closer to their families than are those who do not.
In (E), we're comparing two groups of people: the first group rely on movies and electronic media for their entertainment, the second group entertains themselves in a different way -- we aren't told what that different way is.
Also, there is some amount of closeness that everyone feels towards
their own family. People in the first group will have a higher level of closeness to
their own family than the level of closeness felt towards their own family by people in the second group.
We're looking for an assumption required to conclude that electronic media has an
"inherently corrosive effect on democracy," because it prevents bonds being formed by people participating in groups
outside their family. Knowing about the strength of the bond
between family members is not an assumption that's required for this argument. This is why (E) is not the correct answer to this question.
Compare this to (D):
Quote:
(D) Relying on movies and electronic media for entertainment generally makes people less likely to participate in groups outside their families.
The columnist says people participating in groups outside their families is necessary for democracy to survive. This participation develops the
"strong bonds of mutual trust" required to maintain a democracy.
If relying on movies and electronic media had
no effect on whether people participate in groups outside their families then the reliance on this media for entertainment would not have a corrosive effect on democracy. If (D) is true then people who rely on movies and electronic media for entertainment will be less likely to participate in groups outside their families. This means they will be less likely to develop the
"strong bonds of mutual trust" required to maintain a democracy, and the passage's conclusion follows from the evidence.
(D) is necessary for this argument to be effective, so (D) is the answer to this question.
I hope that helps!