Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jun 2016, 03:41
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Combined MBA Ranking 2007

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 168
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Combined MBA Ranking 2007 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 02:25
Since there are many MBA rankings developed by many publications, I combined the results of US News and BW into one. I believe that the rankings by US News and BW are used more widely than Financial Times' and the economist's. The rational behind using combined ranking is that there is less deviation from the mean.

Methodology: It's easy. I add the rank that a school received from US News and BW together and resort them. (The lower the combined score, the better the rank) For example, for Harvard, US News = 1, BW = 4, so combined score = 5. For Wharton, US News = 3, BW = 2, so the combined score is also 5. Since there are no other schools that get combined score of 5 or lower, both Harvard and Wharton are rank "1st" in my ranking. You get the idea.... So here is the combined ranking...

Harvard 1
U Penn (Wharton) 1
Chicago 3
Kellogg 4
Stanford 4
MIT 6
Berkeley 7
Michigan (Ross) 8
Columbia 9
Duke 10
Dartmouth 10
UCLA (Anderson) 12
NYU (Stern) 13
Virginia (Darden) 14
Cornell 15

Well, I don't know if this information will be helpful to anyone. If it does or does not make any sense, please share your comments.

ghibi!
Economist GMAT Tutor Discount CodesJamboree Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Posts: 116
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 02:57
I think your methodology sounds good, and seeing NYU Stern at the 13th place really breaks my heart. If I get accepted of course.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 168
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 03:06
I think many people will be curious about the calculation of this ranking, so I'll give you the raw score as well.

Format: Rank. School (US News, BW, Sum)

1. Harvard (1,4,5)
1. U Penn (Wharton) (3,2,5)
3. Chicago (6,1,7)
4. Kellogg (5,3,8)
4. Stanford (2,6,8)
6. MIT (4,7,11)
7. Berkeley (7,8,15)
8. Michigan (Ross) (5,11,16)
9 Columbia (7,10,17)
10. Duke (11,9,20)
10. Dartmouth (9,11,20)
12. UCLA (Anderson) (10,12,22)
13. NYU (Stern) (13,14,27)
14. Virginia (Darden) (13,15,28)
15. Cornell (16,13,29)

ghibi!
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 572
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 03:10
IMO all rankings are so fundamentally flawed that they're not terribly useful at the top level. Even when you average some of the rankings you're working with flawed inputs. I tend to look at sub-categories that reflect brand value. For US News thats the preer and recruiter scores and for the FT ranking its the "Alumni Recommended Score."
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 168
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 03:27
dukes wrote:
IMO all rankings are so fundamentally flawed that they're not terribly useful at the top level. Even when you average some of the rankings you're working with flawed inputs. I tend to look at sub-categories that reflect brand value. For US News thats the preer and recruiter scores and for the FT ranking its the "Alumni Recommended Score."


Dear Dukes,

Thanks for sharing your opinion. I understand your concern; however, I am not in a position to say that rankings from which publication are better than the others and why. I just used my gut feeling that more people look at US News and BW. And all i'm doing here is reorganizing the already published data to get a new perspective.

ghibi!
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5926
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 297

Kudos [?]: 1933 [0], given: 7

Premium Member
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 05:34
I did the same thing a while back using

Business Week
Forbes
Fin Times
US N&W
Economist

And look at each of their rankings, then assign a point value to the top 10. That is, #1 is 10 points, #2 is 9 points, #3 is 8 points, etc, you can then add up the points across each school/ranking to come up with a "combined" rank.

So for example, Chicago gets "10 points" for its BW rank, and only 5 for its US N&W rank.

Curiously, here's the list you get (along with its points)

Chicago 37
Wharton 36
Harvard 36
Stanford 36
Dartmouth 26
Kellogg 23
Columbia 21
MIT 14
Ross 11
Stern 10
Berkeley 10
Yale 8
Virginia 4
Duke 2
Cornell 2
UCLA 1

If you throw in WSJ (I got lazy and stopped) I think Wharton comes out as #1. The list is longer than 10 because the top 10 differ from publication to publication.


http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... bined+rank
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 168
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 07:21
Interestingly, It makes me realize that Yale did not make it to top 15 by both US News and BW, but did well on others.

ghibi!
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5239
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 293 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2007, 08:36
These rankings are completely flawed. Shouldn't Thunderbird be #1? :wink:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 168
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2007, 02:10
Using the NEW US NEWS 2008, I recalculated the combined rank as follow:

(US News, BW, Raw Score)

1. Harvard (1,4,5)
1. U Penn (Wharton) (3,2,5)
3. Chicago (5,1,6)
4. Kellogg (5,3,8)
4. Stanford (2,6,8)
6. MIT (4,7,11)
7. Berkeley (8,8,16)
7. Michigan (Ross) (11,5,16)
9. Dartmouth (7,11,18)
10. Columbia (9,10,19)
11. Duke (12,9,21)
12. NYU (Stern) (10,14,24)
13. Cornell (14,13,27)
13. Virginia (Darden) (12,15,27)
15. UCLA (16,12,28)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 485
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2007, 05:57
rhyme wrote:
I did the same thing a while back using

Business Week
Forbes
Fin Times
US N&W
Economist

And look at each of their rankings, then assign a point value to the top 10. That is, #1 is 10 points, #2 is 9 points, #3 is 8 points, etc, you can then add up the points across each school/ranking to come up with a "combined" rank.

So for example, Chicago gets "10 points" for its BW rank, and only 5 for its US N&W rank.

Curiously, here's the list you get (along with its points)

Chicago 37
Wharton 36
Harvard 36
Stanford 36
Dartmouth 26
Kellogg 23
Columbia 21
MIT 14
Ross 11
Stern 10
Berkeley 10
Yale 8
Virginia 4
Duke 2
Cornell 2
UCLA 1

If you throw in WSJ (I got lazy and stopped) I think Wharton comes out as #1. The list is longer than 10 because the top 10 differ from publication to publication.


http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... bined+rank


I think rhyme has it on the money!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 82
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2007, 07:14
GMATT73 wrote:
These rankings are completely flawed. Shouldn't Thunderbird be #1? :wink:


Its amazing how many international applicants really think Thunderbird is #1. An MBA intern of my current office says they did their research extensively (in bulgaria) but hadn't really heard of UChicago or UMichigan.

When you go to the Thunderbird website, they have like five "#1" rankings. If I began my research on that page, I could see why they would be thought of as a top program in the world.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 1359
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2007, 07:19
Upto around mid last year, I thought Thunderbird was a top school, along with the ultra elites and some elites.

Then some people talked sense to me. And I confirmed the actual position of Thunderbird reading Hjort's cluster system and other posts here in GMATClub.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5926
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 297

Kudos [?]: 1933 [0], given: 7

Premium Member
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2007, 07:27
yb wrote:
I think rhyme has it on the money!


Yea, I bet you think that now !
  [#permalink] 30 Mar 2007, 07:27
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
MBA World Fair 2007 GMATT73 13 28 Aug 2007, 14:53
FT 2007 Rankings 3underscore 31 29 Jan 2007, 07:08
Combined Rankings... rhyme 7 01 Jan 2007, 21:54
MBA by specialty ranking? EconGirl 12 28 Nov 2006, 18:29
Best source for MBA rankings? MBABound16 1 15 Aug 2006, 07:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Combined MBA Ranking 2007

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.