Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Jul 2014, 23:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 36
Location: New Jersey
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few [#permalink] New post 24 May 2005, 05:48
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

100% (02:14) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few diversions to amuse them. Therefore they likely read much more than we do today.

Q. Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

a.Many of the books published a century ago were of low literary quality.
b.On average, people who lived a century ago had considerably less leisure time than we do today.
c.The number of books sold today is larger than it was a century ago.
d.On the average, books today cost slightly less is relation to other goods than they did a century ago.
e.One of the popular diversions of a century ago was horse racing.


Question:- I marked E but I later realized that "popular" is a relative term hence doesn't weaken the argument.

The official answer to the question is B.

My approach was:-

Lack of diversion (Causes) more reading

Therefore to weaken there is something else which can account for "more reading". I am unable to understand " how having less time can account for more reading"

Can anyone please explain this to me?

Thanks,
Mohit
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR Question from LSAT Paper Test 37 Section 2 [#permalink] New post 24 May 2005, 21:04
B is the answer. if they didnot have enough time, how they read more in those days than we do today.

E si not corrct. the argument says that they had very few diversion and one of them could be horse ridding.

mohitguptask wrote:
Question:- I marked E but I later realized that "popular" is a relative term hence doesn't weaken the argument.
The official answer to the question is B.
My approach was:- Lack of diversion (Causes) more reading
Therefore to weaken there is something else which can account for "more reading". I am unable to understand " how having less time can account for more reading" Can anyone please explain this to me? Thanks, Mohit
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 100
Location: San Jose,USA- India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 May 2005, 22:17
Please wait a while before posting answer.

Thanks.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 910
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 May 2005, 10:00
B...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 459
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 May 2005, 10:08
B.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 377
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 May 2005, 10:12
Folaa3 wrote:
B...


I too vote for B.

Mohit,
thought you have got to the right one, please read this to see why ur approach is not flawless.

The stem doesn't indicate that lact of diversion caused more reading, rather it suggest "lack of diversion with quite some leisure caused more reading ( coz, less diversion with less leisure wouldn't have to cause them to seek more leisure , aka, reading) - here the had quite some leisure is an assumption.
So if we break the back of the assumption it would weaken the arguement.

HMTG.

HMTG.
  [#permalink] 26 May 2005, 10:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Q.Until a few centuries ago, any large bones discovered in WarriorAjay 12 28 Feb 2011, 08:25
Until a few centuries ago, any large bones discovered in the shobuj 4 21 Apr 2008, 03:01
Until a few centuries ago, any large bones discovered in the gb8 6 03 Sep 2007, 13:38
Until a few centuries ago, any large bones discovered in the Allen760 1 20 Oct 2006, 17:24
Until a few centuries ago, any large bones discovered in the imaru 6 05 Dec 2005, 07:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.