Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Aug 2014, 08:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Concise or is it really different?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1550
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Concise or is it really different? [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2007, 02:45
Hungarian-born professor John Lukacs has written about working as a journalist in Budapest after World War II when employment was scarce, yet still and all, he felt optimistic.

a) employment was scarce, yet still and all, he felt optimistic
b) employment was scarce, yet he felt optimistic
c) there was a scarcity of employment, yet he felt optimistic
d) employment was scarce, yet he nonetheless felt optimistic
e) employment was scarce, yet he felt optimistically

I chose b, but the answer OA is c. I chose b because it looked more concise, yet it is still wrong. What makes c logically different from b? cause to me, both are telling me the same thing. i'd appreciate your help guys!
take care
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 521
Location: Indonesia
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2007, 05:38
I believe, thats because only in B the use of "there"clearly indicates that employment was scarce in Budapest. Rest of the options fail to inform that where the employment was scarce.


Amar
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1550
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2007, 01:54
ok, so without using the word "there", then the issue about "scarcity of employment" could be a general issue applicable to any nation pretty much.

So for example, I could eliminate using the word "there" when I talk about the issue of global warming because it's not an issue of one particular country, but it's a rather general issue applicable to every country. is that correct?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 521
Location: Indonesia
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2007, 03:34
yep, thats my opinion. Clarity is an important parameter.

Amar
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1550
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2007, 06:32
thanks!
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Concise or is it really different? [#permalink] New post 18 Nov 2007, 17:25
tarek99 wrote:
Hungarian-born professor John Lukacs has written about working as a journalist in Budapest after World War II when employment was scarce, yet still and all, he felt optimistic.

a) employment was scarce, yet still and all, he felt optimistic
b) employment was scarce, yet he felt optimistic
c) there was a scarcity of employment, yet he felt optimistic
d) employment was scarce, yet he nonetheless felt optimistic
e) employment was scarce, yet he felt optimistically

I chose b, but the answer OA is c. I chose b because it looked more concise, yet it is still wrong. What makes c logically different from b? cause to me, both are telling me the same thing. i'd appreciate your help guys!
take care



'C' is for parrellism. The tone used is indirect speech..
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1550
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2007, 03:15
Beyond700, what is indirect speech??
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2007, 03:30
tarek99 wrote:
Beyond700, what is indirect speech??


Indirect speech (also called Reported speech) is used to communicate what someone else said, but without using the exact words.

Eg: He said he was going to come. (The person's exact words were "I am going to come")
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2007, 07:47
I thought B , still not convinced with C.
  [#permalink] 19 Nov 2007, 07:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Question on Pronouns: Concision and Clarity raviram80 3 07 Nov 2011, 10:40
Top MBA vs. an OKAY MBA: Is there really a difference? same7 3 27 Jun 2011, 20:02
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Good Question-SC Pronouns; concision amirdubai1982 5 17 Oct 2010, 13:38
Conciseness of comparison suchoudh 1 10 Oct 2010, 13:22
20 What really is the difference? domtri33 8 30 Jan 2009, 08:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Concise or is it really different?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.