Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Connsumers in California seeking personal loans have fewer [#permalink]
07 May 2007, 19:35
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Connsumers in California seeking personal loans have fewer banks to turn than do consumers elsewhere in the US. This shortage of competion among banks explains why interest rates on personal loans in California are higher than in any other region of the US.
Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the conclusion above?
A. Because of the comparatively high wayes they must pay to attract qualified workers, California banks charge depositors more than banks elsewhere do for many of the services they offer.
B. Personal loans are risker than other types of loans, such as home mortgage loans, that banks make.
C. Since bank deposits in California are covered by the same type of insurnance that guarentees bank deposit in other parts of the United States, they are no less secure than deposits elsewhere
D. The proportion of consumers who default on their personal loans is lower in California than in any other region of the US
E. Interest rates paid by California banks to depositors are lower than those paid by banks in other parts of the US because in California there is less competition to attract depositors
In the passage, does the shortage of competition among banks mean that there is no competition? I am a bit confused
We are asked to weakend the conclusion that the reason banks in CA charge highter interest rates is because there is less competition in CA than in any other US region.
Therefore, we need to look for a choice that would provide an alternative explanation to higher interest rates on personal loans in CA.
a - YES! this choice states that since CA banks have to pay higher wages to the bank employees, they have to generate more revenue to operate. So they charge more for the services they offer (higher rates on personal loans ) b - talks about personal loans in general. there is nothing here that applies to CA
c - from this choice we can only conclude that CA banks are as secure as the rest of the banks in the US - still doesn't help
d - this choice actually infers the opposite - that CA borrowers are safer than borrowers in other regions, and therefore should be charged lower rates
e - talks about rates on deposits - ummm... not relevant to the argument in the passage at all