Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 00:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Considering the current economy, the introduction of a new

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 138 [0], given: 70

Considering the current economy, the introduction of a new [#permalink] New post 17 May 2013, 00:04
5. Considering the current economy, the introduction of a new brand of cereal is unlikely to expand total sales of cereal, but rather will just cause some existing buyers of cereal to switch brands. So it makes no sense for the Coolidge Corporation to introduce another brand of cereal, since they will only hurt sales of the brands of cereal they already produce.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) Total sales of cereal will increase as the total population increases.
(B) Many new brands of cereal sell extremely well for the first year of their existence.
(C) Coolidge Corporation currently produces fewer brands of cereal than do its competitors.
(D) Some cereal buyers regularly switch from brand to brand, even when no new brands have been introduced.
(E) Research indicates that the new brand will attract more buyers of competitors’ cereals than buyers of other Coolidge brands.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 510
Schools: Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 354 [1] , given: 241

Re: Verbal Challenge 1.2: CR Questions [#permalink] New post 17 May 2013, 02:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
5)Considering the current economy, the introduction of a new brand of cereal is unlikely to expand total sales of cereal, but rather will just cause some existing buyers of cereal to switch brands. So it makes no sense for the Coolidge Corporation to introduce another brand of cereal, since they will only hurt sales of the brands of cereal they already produce.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?
(A) Total sales of cereal will increase as the total population increases. -
Exaggerated. Moreover this option TRIES to negate the premise "the introduction of a new brand of cereal is unlikely to expand total sales of cereal". GMAT never considers an option correct if it negates the author's premise. Thus INCORRECT.
(B) Many new brands of cereal sell extremely well for the first year of their existence. - Out of scope because this option does not talk about the new brand of Coolidge Corporation. Thus INCORRECT
(C) Coolidge Corporation currently produces fewer brands of cereal than do its competitors. - If Coolidge produces only 5 brands & its competitors produces 10 brands. If Coolidge introduces new brand it may not hurt the sales of its competitors because maybe sale of its competitors is insignificant in comparison to Coolidge. INCORRECT
(D) Some cereal buyers regularly switch from brand to brand, even when no new brands have been introduced. - Irrelevant, same as option B. INCORRECT
(E) Research indicates that the new brand will attract more buyers of competitors’ cereals than buyers of other Coolidge brands.
- BINGO, this option clearly state that introduction of new brand will affect BOTH. Thus it weakens the conclusion that introduction of new brand will affect ONLY Coolidge. CORRECT

_________________

If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS.
Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth
-Game Theory

If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 1057
Location: India
City: Pune
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
Followers: 121

Kudos [?]: 751 [1] , given: 800

Re: Verbal Challenge 1.2: CR Questions [#permalink] New post 19 May 2013, 12:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Question 5
Answer should be E


Premise 1 :- Total sales of cereals is unlikely to increase considering the current market situation.

Premise 2 :- Intruduction of a new brand of cereal will not fetch new customers in the total cereal market while few existing customers would switch to the new brand

Conclusion :- For Coolidge corporation, plan of Introducing new cereal brand will not boost its total sale as only few of its existing customers would switch to a new brand, resulting in decline in sales of company's other brands.

lets assume that Total Number of cereal customers is 100 and in which 25 customers are of Coolidge corporation's and remaining 75 are of its competitor's.
Author assumes or indirectly states that new cereal brand will fetch customers from the group of 25 customers.
If we establish that the new cereal brand will fetch customers also from the group of 75 customers thereby increasing companies overall customer base, then we can weaken the conclusion.

A) Incorrect - As per premise 1, Given the current market situation, total sales of cereals will not increase at all even if population increases

B) Incorrect - This choice does not comment on whether new customers would come from group 75

C) Incorrect - Nope

D) Incorrect - Here too we are not getting desired information

E) Correct :- This choice states that coolidge corporation will earn some new customers from its competitors. Hence the sales and customer base of coolidge corporation will increase


Narenn

_________________

Be the coolest guy in the MBA Forum - Be a threadmaster!

Have a blog? Feature it on GMAT Club!

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Next Generation GMATClub CATS with Brilliant Analytics.

Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books


2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 138 [2] , given: 70

Re: Verbal Challenge 1.2: CR Questions [#permalink] New post 21 May 2013, 20:54
2
This post received
KUDOS
Zarrolou wrote:
5) Considering the current economy, the introduction of a new brand of cereal is unlikely to expand total sales of cereal, but rather will just cause some existing buyers of cereal to switch brands. So it makes no sense for the Coolidge Corporation to introduce another brand of cereal, since they will only hurt sales of the brands of cereal they already produce.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) Total sales of cereal will increase as the total population increases.
(B) Many new brands of cereal sell extremely well for the first year of their existence.
(C) Coolidge Corporation currently produces fewer brands of cereal than do its competitors.
(D) Some cereal buyers regularly switch from brand to brand, even when no new brands have been introduced.
(E) Research indicates that the new brand will attract more buyers of competitors’ cereals than buyers of other

Coolidge brands.


Explanation:

Conclusion of the argument is: Coolidge Corporation should not introduce another brand of cereal so as not to hurt sales of its own existing brands of cereal.

The evidence shown here is: Introduction of new brand of cereal will not expand total sales but cause existing customers to switch brands.

The underlying assumption here is that the new brand of cereal will attract only the existing customers of Coolidge Corporation and no (or hardly any) customer of competitor’s brands of cereal will switch to buy the new brand of cereal of Coolidge Corporation.

The question is asking for a statement to weaken the conclusion. This can be done if the underlying assumption can be proved wrong.

A) Even if the total sales increase, we cannot conclude whether the new brand of cereal will benefit Coolidge Corporation. Wrong.
B) If customers just change from one brand to another brand of cereal of Coolidge Corporation, the total customer base of Coolidge Corporation will remain unchanged and thus the new brand of cereal will not give any advantage to the company. Wrong.
C) May it be fewer brands of cereal that Coolidge Corporation has, this fact does not prove that a new brand of cereal will attract the customers from the company’s competitors. Wrong.
D) Irrespective of introduction of a new brand, if switching brands is usual phenomenon, we cannot say whether introduction of a new brand by Coolidge Corporation will be advantageous for the company. Wrong.
E) Correct. Here the statement proves that the underlying assumption is wrong.

Correct Answer is E.
Re: Verbal Challenge 1.2: CR Questions   [#permalink] 21 May 2013, 20:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Current JD Considering MBA In the Future claripal 1 05 Jun 2014, 07:13
A New Member Introduction Romenesko 0 04 Oct 2012, 00:13
1 Introduction New Member !! MarksBradshaw 4 24 Jan 2012, 05:31
1 MBA in the New Economy mydebanjali 3 26 Dec 2008, 12:46
Alonso : the introduction of a new drug into the marketplace alimad 7 11 Jun 2008, 18:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Considering the current economy, the introduction of a new

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.