Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag : Sentence Correction (EA only)

sagarsabnis

Manager

Joined: 22 Jul 2009

Posts: 82

Location: Manchester UK

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

Updated on: 24 Oct 2019, 05:14

6

Kudos

20

Bookmarks

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:32) correct

28% (01:38) wrong

based on 1555 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant

(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant

(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them

(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired

(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

Show Spoiler

what's wrong in B???

Show Answer

Official Answer

Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.

Originally posted by sagarsabnis on 20 Oct 2009, 06:37.
Last edited by Bunuel on 24 Oct 2019, 05:14, edited 2 times in total.

Renamed the topic and edited the question.

request expert reply

shekharvineet

Manager

Joined: 24 Aug 2010

Posts: 103

Location: Finland

Schools:Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade

WE 1: 3.5 years international

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Nov 2010, 07:15

21

Kudos

2

Bookmarks

sagarsabnis wrote:

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

The answer is A.
From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation

talk2pk

Intern

Joined: 28 Aug 2009

Posts: 22

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

21 Oct 2009, 05:06

wts wrong in C..?
sagarsabnis: Cud u pls post the explainations ?

L

chetan2u

RC & DI Moderator

Joined: 02 Aug 2009

Status:Math and DI Expert

Posts: 11127

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

21 Oct 2009, 05:20

2

Kudos

Expert Reply

A
as i see , c has wrong pronoun usage... them for an applicant
_________________

1. Absolute modulus:. 2. Fractions: 3. Percentage increase: 4. Combinations:

Signature Read More

Economist

Senior Manager

Joined: 01 Apr 2008

Posts: 392

Name: Ronak Amin

Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

21 Oct 2009, 06:15

3

Kudos

1

Bookmarks

sagarsabnis wrote:

(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
whats wrong in B???

The drugs are not the grounds for rejecting an applicant...the 'usage' of drugs by an applicant is a problem for the chief

kairoshan

Manager

Joined: 11 Aug 2009

Posts: 61

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

22 Oct 2009, 07:46

talk2pk wrote:

wts wrong in C..?
sagarsabnis: Cud u pls post the explainations ?

The biggiest problem in C is that it uses pronoun 'them' to refer to antecedent of possessive form 'an applicant's'. In addition, 'them' is wrong to refer to singular antecedent.

(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them

raven678

Intern

Joined: 11 Jul 2009

Posts: 22

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

15 Nov 2009, 21:17

sagarsabnis wrote:

960. Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

Recommended falls under subjunctive category. So "should" is incorrect usage. Be is sufficient.

Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjunctive_mood

sasen

Manager

Joined: 28 Aug 2009

Posts: 75

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

16 Nov 2009, 11:48

2

Kudos

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
CORRECT
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
"ANY USE OF DRUG" AND NOT "THE DRUG" SHOULD BE GROUNDS FOR BLAH BLAH BLAH.
"APPLYING FOR A JOB" SHOULD BE "APPLICATION FOR A JOB"
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
SUBJECT VERB AGRREMENT PROBLEM
AN APPLICANTS USE/ THEM IS INCORRECT
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
SUBJECT VERB AGRREMENT PROBLEM
AN APPLICANTS USE/ THEY IS INCORRECT
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them
SUBJECT VERB AGRREMENT PROBLEM
AN APPLICANTS USE/ THEM IS INCORRECT

EkaterinaZ

Intern

Joined: 21 Oct 2010

Posts: 4

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Nov 2010, 07:13

1

Kudos

It`s A.

B is not the answer, because the USE is the subject of the sentence.
C is not correct, since applicant`s is Singular, while THEM is plural
D is not chosen for the same reason as C + the Verb is not used in the correct form
E - the same as C + wrong modifier placement

zisis

Manager

Joined: 16 Feb 2010

Posts: 122

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Nov 2010, 07:58

1

Kudos

sagarsabnis wrote:

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

+1 A
C,D,E refer to "an" applicant as them (noun-antecedent error)
B is awkward for various reason ( subject is drug and not the use of drugs, "should" changes the meaning etc) cannt be 100% what the error is for B but i eliminated it due to "awkardness"

saxenashobhit

Manager

Joined: 20 Jul 2010

Posts: 137

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Nov 2010, 08:24

1

Kudos

Nice question. C, D and E can be eliminated for pronoun error. All these sentences use possesive noun (applicant's) and they, them cannot refer to him

vaibhavtripathi

Manager

Joined: 04 Oct 2010

Status:I rest, I rust.

Posts: 68

Schools:ISB - Co 2013

WE 1: IT Professional since 2006

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Nov 2010, 11:35

sagarsabnis wrote:

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

Nice question, took me a while to get around it.
C, D and E may be rejected straight away; all three of them have "...an applicant...they/them...".
B voilates the format of command subjunctive. Left with A.

nageshshiv

Manager

Joined: 13 Apr 2010

Posts: 89

Location: singapore

Schools:Wharton,NY Stern,INSEAD,Stanford

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

Updated on: 12 Nov 2010, 21:14

2

Kudos

The sentence is subjunctive mood.

So "should be "....is incorrect ...B is out

Ans C & E contain "them" doesn't have antecedent

"D " contains incorrect idiom "grounds"

Correct idiom "grounds...for"

Originally posted by nageshshiv on 01 Nov 2010, 16:55.
Last edited by nageshshiv on 12 Nov 2010, 21:14, edited 1 time in total.

amkabdul

Intern

Joined: 08 Oct 2013

Status:At the end all are winners, Some just take a little more time to win.

Posts: 7

Location: India

Concentration: Finance, Accounting

GMAT Date: 11-20-2013

GPA: 3.97

WE:Consulting (Computer Software)

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

28 Oct 2013, 14:12

shekharvineet wrote:

sagarsabnis wrote:

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

The answer is A.
From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation

To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all

B

Paris75

Manager

Joined: 26 Aug 2013

Status:Student

Posts: 132

Location: France

Concentration: Finance, General Management

Schools: EMLYON FT'16

GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32

GPA: 3.44

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Nov 2013, 09:44

amkabdul wrote:

shekharvineet wrote:

sagarsabnis wrote:

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

The answer is A.
From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation

To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all

The answer is logical and it is A!

Hire or hiring is not the purpose. One of the main exercise of those question is to find the meaning (here it is ok because the meaning is simple)

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant ==> says that the the drugs should be grounds for not hiring It does not make sense at all
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them ==> Them?
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired ==> that they not be hired ? This is wrong, wordy, crap..;As you wish...
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them ==> Them?

Hope it helps!

Answer A obvious!
_________________

Think outside the box

Signature Read More

rango

Manager

Joined: 28 Apr 2013

Posts: 101

Location: India

Schools: Kellogg 1YR '16 Tuck '16 HKU'16 HKUST '16 Tsinghua '16 IIMA Darden '16 Haas '16 Guanghua '16

GPA: 4

WE:Medicine and Health (Health Care)

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

22 Nov 2013, 07:21

sagarsabnis wrote:

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

recommended( Bossy verb) that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job( Subject) be grounds for not hiring an applicant( Subjunctive mood) [/u].

Hp it helps
:banana

G

daboo343

Manager

Joined: 09 Nov 2012

Status:You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come

Posts: 227

Daboo: Sonu

GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20

GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38 Verified score

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag [#permalink]

23 Jan 2017, 23:45

1

Kudos

sagarsabnis wrote:

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

what's wrong in B???

"Should" in b IS WRONG. In subjunctive mood we cannot use should. Only base
form of verb is used.
all the blow mentioned verbs require subjunctive mood.
Demand, Dictate
Recommend, Request
Insist, Mandate , Propose.
Apart of these few other verbs can take command subjunctive though may also take infinitive form
Ask, Beg, Intend, Order, Prefer, Urge and Require
This question tests on subjunctive hence B and D are straight out.
"Them" in C cannot refer to applicant's use. Pronoun ambiguity.
E also has pronoun ambiguity
Hence A is correct

VerbalBot

Non-Human User

Joined: 01 Oct 2013

Posts: 17207

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Aug 2023, 08:30

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Signature Read More

gmatclubot

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments personnel ag [#permalink]

01 Aug 2023, 08:30

GMAT Sentence Correction (EA only) Questions

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel ag

GMAT Question Banks