Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 06:18

# LIVE NOW:

Chat with Admission Manager and Current Student of NUS SIngapore - Join Chat Room to Participate.

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 87
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 6

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2010, 05:31
A. Suggests is followed by "be" . This is a "request" being made by the chief.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Status: At the end all are winners, Some just take a little more time to win.
Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GMAT Date: 11-20-2013
GPA: 3.97
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 45

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2013, 13:12
1
KUDOS
shekharvineet wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation

To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 574
GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 106

Kudos [?]: 839 [0], given: 319

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2013, 13:16
amkabdul wrote:
shekharvineet wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation

To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all

The source of the question is http://thousandsc.blogspot.in/2006/04/qn220.html
As you can see not a standard source. Pls.Ignore the question. This is also discussed here
_________________

General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum

Intern
Joined: 19 Sep 2013
Posts: 21
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 17

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2013, 04:29
drozzy wrote:
hold the party Phantoms!

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant

the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job

does this mean that anyone uses in this universe uses "crack" and the poor applicant gets screwed?

tell me that "A" is the best out of the (bad) lot.... i'll agree!

The By the applicant is implied here. It has been removed to make the sentence shorter.
_________________

Kudos if you like my post

Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 265
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 401

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2013, 08:44
amkabdul wrote:
shekharvineet wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation

To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all

The answer is logical and it is A!

Hire or hiring is not the purpose. One of the main exercise of those question is to find the meaning (here it is ok because the meaning is simple)

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant ==> says that the the drugs should be grounds for not hiring It does not make sense at all
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them ==> Them?
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired ==> that they not be hired ? This is wrong, wordy, crap..;As you wish...
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them ==> Them?

Hope it helps!

_________________

Think outside the box

Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 159
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 84

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2013, 06:21
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

recommended( Bossy verb) that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job( Subject) be grounds for not hiring an applicant( Subjunctive mood) [/u].

Hp it helps

_________________

Thanks for Posting

LEARN TO ANALYSE

+1 kudos if you like

Intern
Joined: 09 Aug 2009
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 18

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2014, 04:22
A seems to be correct since there is no pronoun error.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10533
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2016, 12:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 63

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2017, 03:51
wrong pronoun error
Them can not be used for possessive noun in C,D & E and B gives wrong meaning
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments   [#permalink] 16 Jan 2017, 03:51

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 A United States government facility performing research ... 3 14 Oct 2013, 10:36
11 Medicare, the United States government's health insurance 8 08 May 2012, 08:21
36 Medicare, the United States governments health insurance 19 15 Aug 2009, 09:59
Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments 4 09 Jul 2009, 00:14
Medicare, the United States governments health insurance 5 29 Sep 2007, 21:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by