Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 14:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 87
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 6

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2010, 05:31
A. Suggests is followed by "be" . This is a "request" being made by the chief.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: At the end all are winners, Some just take a little more time to win.
Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GMAT Date: 11-20-2013
GPA: 3.97
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 45

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2013, 13:12
1
This post received
KUDOS
shekharvineet wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

The answer is A.
From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation :)




To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all :(
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 483
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 395 [0], given: 239

Premium Member
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2013, 13:16
amkabdul wrote:
shekharvineet wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

The answer is A.
From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation :)




To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all :(


The source of the question is http://thousandsc.blogspot.in/2006/04/qn220.html
As you can see not a standard source. Pls.Ignore the question. This is also discussed here

_________________

How to CHOOSE your Business School
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources such as 1000 series.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2013
Posts: 21
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 17

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2013, 04:29
drozzy wrote:
hold the party Phantoms!

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant

the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job

does this mean that anyone uses in this universe uses "crack" and the poor applicant gets screwed?

tell me that "A" is the best out of the (bad) lot.... i'll agree!


The By the applicant is implied here. It has been removed to make the sentence shorter.

_________________

Kudos if you like my post :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 261
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 397

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2013, 08:44
amkabdul wrote:
shekharvineet wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

The answer is A.
From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation :)




To actually keep in sync and put the command subjunctive force to peace, we have to use the verb form in its most simple form. "Hiring" is incorrect here and should be replaced with Hire.

Undoubtedly the C option which is the only one which suffices to this prerequisite is also incorrect due to wrong pronoun reference.

Guess this question has no correct options given at all :(


The answer is logical and it is A!

Hire or hiring is not the purpose. One of the main exercise of those question is to find the meaning (here it is ok because the meaning is simple)

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant ==> says that the the drugs should be grounds for not hiring It does not make sense at all
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them ==> Them?
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired ==> that they not be hired ? This is wrong, wordy, crap..;As you wish...
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them ==> Them?

Hope it helps!

Answer A obvious!

_________________

Think outside the box

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 174
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 84

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments [#permalink] New post 22 Nov 2013, 06:21
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???


recommended( Bossy verb) that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job( Subject) be grounds for not hiring an applicant( Subjunctive mood) [/u].

Hp it helps
:banana

_________________

Thanks for Posting

LEARN TO ANALYSE

+1 kudos if you like

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments   [#permalink] 22 Nov 2013, 06:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Medicare, the United States governments health insurance rohansherry 15 15 Aug 2009, 09:59
Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments acer2knight 4 09 Jul 2009, 00:14
Medicare, the United States governments health insurance singh_amit19 5 29 Sep 2007, 21:38
Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments Banta 6 19 Sep 2006, 22:52
The United States government generally tries to Protect crackgmat3 2 14 Sep 2004, 12:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.