Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Apr 2014, 10:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 659
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this [#permalink] New post 12 May 2011, 07:25
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

41% (02:39) correct 58% (02:00) wrong based on 94 sessions
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service
charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the
advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has
increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence.
However, eliminating the state
requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase
rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees
when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now
advertise would increase their fees.

In the consumer advocate’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a
consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization.
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at
issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
(C) The first is pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue;
the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
(D) The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that
prediction.
(E) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate
defends; the second is that position.

OA after discussion, please post your timing too
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

VP
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1368
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 10 [#permalink] New post 12 May 2011, 23:27
Its a clean C.

1st statement is a cause and effect statement.
2nd gives a reasoning for the conclusion drawn by the advocate.

time 1:24
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 659
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 10 [#permalink] New post 12 May 2011, 23:30
i managed this in 1:45 min, need to do something about the questions in which the stimulus is lengthy,

will post the oa after some more discussion
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2176
Followers: 172

Kudos [?]: 1524 [0], given: 610

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: OG 10 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2011, 06:50
Expert's post
C in little more 2 minutes but this kind of CR are time consuming, the stimulus is long.........is fairly good.

This kind of question , however, will appear only if someone doing very well, I guess ..)
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 314
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 46

Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2013, 12:47
garimavyas wrote:
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service
charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the
advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has
increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence.
However, eliminating the state
requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase
rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees
when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now
advertise would increase their fees.

In the consumer advocate’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a
consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization.
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at
issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
(C) The first is pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue;
the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
(D) The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that
prediction.
(E) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate
defends; the second is that position.

OA after discussion, please post your timing too


Hi
it took long time to answer .I took 3.03 mints to answer.In real exam how to handle this type of long argument?I think its C.plz explain the answer in details indicating every part of the argument like premises,counter premises..........
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 271
Location: European union
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 37

Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2013, 15:32
C in 2:34. What is the average time we should try to answer esch CR question if we aim for Verbal score above 40 ?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 69
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 63

Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this [#permalink] New post 30 Mar 2013, 09:05
I chose E, which is obviously wrong but I would like to know why C is the correct answer.
Also what does Main Position actually mean and what is the conclusion of the argument?
And in these type of questions where the conclusion is not clear-cut, what is the best approach to identify it?
Thanks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 76
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT Date: 01-31-2014
GPA: 3.98
WE: Project Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 14

Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this [#permalink] New post 14 Jan 2014, 07:43
mahendru1992 wrote:
I chose E, which is obviously wrong but I would like to know why C is the correct answer.
Also what does Main Position actually mean and what is the conclusion of the argument?
And in these type of questions where the conclusion is not clear-cut, what is the best approach to identify it?
Thanks


Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service
charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the
advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has
increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state
requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase
rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees
when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now
advertise would increase their fees.

The conclusion represents the main thought of the author, indicators may help, but once you reach the end of the argument you should already have a clear idea about the author's position. That idea is the main point and the author's conclusion.

- General statemet
B1 - Adds more to the general statement
- Argues against boldface B1 (main idea of the passage)
B2 - supports the main idea

Additionally: B1 and B2 follow an opposite direction. Since B2 supports the main point and the main point argues against B1.


In the consumer advocate’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a
consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization.
B1 and B2 follow an opposite direction. wrong
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at
issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
the second supports the main point. wrong
(C) The first is pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue;
the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
Looks good, "prediction" is out main point, B2 supports the main point. B1 is indeed a pattern of cause and effect that won't hold true.
(D) The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that
prediction.
B1 and B2 take a different direction. wrong
(E) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate
defends; the second is that position.
The second supports the main position, it is not the main position itself. wrong

P.S. Timing is important but don't get stressed too much, Boldface are hard questions especially for non-natives like me. Figure out an approach that leads you to the correct answer and be consistent with it.
_________________

Either suffer the pain of discipline, or suffer the pain of regret.

If my posts are helping you show some love awarding a kudos

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2176
Followers: 172

Kudos [?]: 1524 [0], given: 610

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this [#permalink] New post 14 Jan 2014, 09:16
Expert's post
The trick is to understand the economy of the stimulus. How it is organized and how the parts before in between and after the bold phrase is unfolded.

If you do this, then the answer is pretty straighforward (almost always)

Regards
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2013
Posts: 4
GMAT Date: 04-08-2014
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2014, 14:31
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.

In the consumer advocate’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization.
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
(C) The first is pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
(D) The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.
(E) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate defends; the second is that position.


!
Merged in Similar Topic.
Please pay attention to and follow the Rules for posting in Verbal forum.

Last edited by Narenn on 02 Apr 2014, 23:41, edited 1 time in total.
Merging Similar Topics
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1697
Followers: 388

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2014, 09:30
Expert's post
singhvipin1 wrote:
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.

In the consumer advocate’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization.
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
(C) The first is pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
(D) The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.
(E) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate defends; the second is that position.

Dear singhvipin1,
I don't know whether you saw the complete discussion at this link:
consumer-advocate-it-is-generally-true-at-least-in-this-113575.html

As a general rule, it's good to do a search for a question to verify whether it has been answered before, rather than just starting a brand new thread for the question.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 105
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 810

CAT Tests
Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2014, 08:47
I picked (D) over (C), because I didn't agree with the fact that BF 2 was a consideration.
How is BF2 a consideration?
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1697
Followers: 388

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2014, 09:52
Expert's post
TooLong150 wrote:
I picked (D) over (C), because I didn't agree with the fact that BF 2 was a consideration.
How is BF2 a consideration?

Dear TooLong150,
The word "consideration" is a funny word. In colloquial speech, it is used to mean "courtesy" --- to show someone some consideration. That usage is far too casual for the GMAT.

In the formal sense, the word "consideration" means: a thought, an idea, an intelligent perspective, or an argument. Any well-thought out statement could be called a "consideration", so in that sense, virtually every sentence that appears in the GMAT CR could be called a "consideration."

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
Status: Accuracy is key to Success
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 15

Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2014, 22:19
Hi Mike,

I have a doubt regarding boldfaced CR question.

Do we need to evaluate what role the two bold faced statements play with regard to Conclusion ?
(or)
Do we have any other method to evaluate these kind of Questions.

As far as this question is concerned, my method of solving the question is this

If we consider "eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs" as Conclusion and then evaluate the two bold faced Statements then we get

a) first bold faced opposes (or) does not hold true
b) Second bold faced statement is in favor (or) Supports the conclusion.

Hence Answer is C.

Mike , could you please tell whether my approach is correct or wrong.

Thanks in advance :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1697
Followers: 388

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st [#permalink] New post 03 Apr 2014, 09:56
Expert's post
dheeraj24 wrote:
Hi Mike,

I have a doubt regarding boldfaced CR question.

Do we need to evaluate what role the two bold faced statements play with regard to Conclusion ?
(or)
Do we have any other method to evaluate these kind of Questions.

As far as this question is concerned, my method of solving the question is this

If we consider "eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs" as Conclusion and then evaluate the two bold faced Statements then we get

a) first bold faced opposes (or) does not hold true
b) Second bold faced statement is in favor (or) Supports the conclusion.

Hence Answer is C.

Mike , could you please tell whether my approach is correct or wrong.

Thanks in advance :)

Dear dheeraj24,
I'm happy to respond.

First of all, your approach in this question is correct. The sentence you quoted I would call the conclusion, and I agree with your interpretation of the two BF statements.

I would say: in every every every GMAT CR, you should know exactly what the conclusion is. If you don't understand what the conclusion of an argument is, then you don't understand the argument. More than that, you should always understand the role of every single sentence in every single argument, and how it relates to the conclusion. Don't think of boldface questions as a separate category ---- they are simply testing a skill that you should be applying 100% of the time in every sentence of every argument. If you find arguments in which you don't understand the roles of individual sentences, those are fantastic questions to post here on GMAT Club and ask experts for their advice. You are always more than welcome to send me a p.m. asking for my input.

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
Status: Accuracy is key to Success
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 15

Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st [#permalink] New post 03 Apr 2014, 10:11
Thanks Mike for your support :)

mikemcgarry wrote:
dheeraj24 wrote:
Hi Mike,

I have a doubt regarding boldfaced CR question.

Do we need to evaluate what role the two bold faced statements play with regard to Conclusion ?
(or)
Do we have any other method to evaluate these kind of Questions.

As far as this question is concerned, my method of solving the question is this

If we consider "eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs" as Conclusion and then evaluate the two bold faced Statements then we get

a) first bold faced opposes (or) does not hold true
b) Second bold faced statement is in favor (or) Supports the conclusion.

Hence Answer is C.

Mike , could you please tell whether my approach is correct or wrong.

Thanks in advance :)

Dear dheeraj24,
I'm happy to respond.

First of all, your approach in this question is correct. The sentence you quoted I would call the conclusion, and I agree with your interpretation of the two BF statements.

I would say: in every every every GMAT CR, you should know exactly what the conclusion is. If you don't understand what the conclusion of an argument is, then you don't understand the argument. More than that, you should always understand the role of every single sentence in every single argument, and how it relates to the conclusion. Don't think of boldface questions as a separate category ---- they are simply testing a skill that you should be applying 100% of the time in every sentence of every argument. If you find arguments in which you don't understand the roles of individual sentences, those are fantastic questions to post here on GMAT Club and ask experts for their advice. You are always more than welcome to send me a p.m. asking for my input.

Mike :-)
Re: Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st   [#permalink] 03 Apr 2014, 10:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Consumer Advocate: The current obsession with low GMATT73 11 07 May 2005, 19:13
New posts Consumer Advocate: It is generally true, at least in this kimmyg 4 05 Sep 2005, 11:16
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this garimavyas 0 14 Jan 2014, 09:16
Popular new posts 6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Public health advocate: It is generally true that medication BukrsGmat 13 12 Oct 2012, 20:49
New posts Experts publish their posts in the topic Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st singhvipin1 1 06 Mar 2014, 11:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.