Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 19:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 06:31
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose. The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended. For instance, a “three and up” label is required on toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age. Although the current toy-labeling law has indeed reduced the incidence of injuries to children from toys, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer advocate’s argument?
(A) Certain types of toys have never been associated with injury to children.
(B) Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.
(C) The majority of children injured by toys are under three years of age.
(D) Many parents do not pay attention to manufacturers’ labels when they select toys for their children.
(E) Choking is the most serious hazard presented to children by toys.


b
Please explain your answers!!
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 06:47
Will go for 'C'
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Toy labeling law [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 06:55
eyunni wrote:
Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose. The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended. For instance, a “three and up” label is required on toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age. Although the current toy-labeling law has indeed reduced the incidence of injuries to children from toys, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer advocate’s argument?
(A) Certain types of toys have never been associated with injury to children.
(B) Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.
(C) The majority of children injured by toys are under three years of age.
(D) Many parents do not pay attention to manufacturers’ labels when they select toys for their children.
(E) Choking is the most serious hazard presented to children by toys.


b
Please explain your answers!!


I got B
My own answer was: the accidents not only happen within the age range specified, but this wasn't one of the answer.
Ig B is true, then explicit label can make parents be more aware; thus, prevent more injuries.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Toy labeling law [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 09:27
eyunni wrote:
Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose. The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended. For instance, a “three and up” label is required on toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age. Although the current toy-labeling law has indeed reduced the incidence of injuries to children from toys, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer advocate’s argument?
(A) Certain types of toys have never been associated with injury to children.
(B) Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.
(C) The majority of children injured by toys are under three years of age.
(D) Many parents do not pay attention to manufacturers’ labels when they select toys for their children.
(E) Choking is the most serious hazard presented to children by toys.


b
Please explain your answers!!


Im stuck btwn B and E.

We want to strengthen the conclusion that these labels would help prevent injuries in children from toys.

A: This is irrelevant.
C: To me this suggests that the current labels do the job.
D: This weakens the conclusion.

E and B. I think E is not as good of a choice as B, b/c E doesn't really tell us much. E says that choking is a serious hazard. But this doesn't say whether the current labels already do the job. It does somewhat strengthen the argument, but suggesting that the labels would help parents realize that chocking is a serious hazard. Still I think its weak.


B: Since most parents don't really know what current labels are for, new labels explicitly stating what the hazards of the toy are, then parents will not be confused, but well aware! This strengthens the argument.

I say B.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 112
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Toy labeling law [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 09:45
eyunni wrote:
Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose. The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended. For instance, a “three and up” label is required on toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age. Although the current toy-labeling law has indeed reduced the incidence of injuries to children from toys, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer advocate’s argument?
(A) Certain types of toys have never been associated with injury to children.
(B) Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.
(C) The majority of children injured by toys are under three years of age.
(D) Many parents do not pay attention to manufacturers’ labels when they select toys for their children.
(E) Choking is the most serious hazard presented to children by toys.


b
Please explain your answers!!


Sub-Conclusion - The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose.

Main Conclusion - Parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information

Premise - The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended

Assumption - Labels indicating only the age range for who a toy is intended for does not inform parents of the safety hazards. They believe this information is telling them something else.

Answer - B Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.

This answer confirms what is indicated to parents when they are given only the age range that the toy is intended for.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 908
Schools: Kellogg '10
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 15

 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 12:46
What's the OA. This one is hard.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 13:01
hhheehehe i got answer B. a bit tricky, whats the OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 370
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Toy labeling law [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 13:15
eyunni wrote:
Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose. The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended. For instance, a “three and up” label is required on toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age. Although the current toy-labeling law has indeed reduced the incidence of injuries to children from toys, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer advocate’s argument?
(A) Certain types of toys have never been associated with injury to children.
(B) Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.
(C) The majority of children injured by toys are under three years of age.
(D) Many parents do not pay attention to manufacturers’ labels when they select toys for their children.
(E) Choking is the most serious hazard presented to children by toys.


b
Please explain your answers!!


B --looks the most tempting. I would go with B
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 13:50
OA is B
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 14:16
beckee529 wrote:
hhheehehe i got answer B. a bit tricky, whats the OA?


lol wuts so funny? ;p
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 14:20
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
beckee529 wrote:
hhheehehe i got answer B. a bit tricky, whats the OA?


lol wuts so funny? ;p


just that bkk145 and i were discussing how we seem to choose the same verbal answers :) now if only bkk145's 51 math level skills translated to my GMAT math potential =P
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2007, 15:41
beckee529 wrote:
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
beckee529 wrote:
hhheehehe i got answer B. a bit tricky, whats the OA?


lol wuts so funny? ;p


just that bkk145 and i were discussing how we seem to choose the same verbal answers :) now if only bkk145's 51 math level skills translated to my GMAT math potential =P


:)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 529
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Toy labeling law [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2007, 18:52
bkk145 wrote:
eyunni wrote:
Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose. The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended. For instance, a “three and up” label is required on toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age. Although the current toy-labeling law has indeed reduced the incidence of injuries to children from toys, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer advocate’s argument?
(A) Certain types of toys have never been associated with injury to children.
(B) Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.
(C) The majority of children injured by toys are under three years of age.
(D) Many parents do not pay attention to manufacturers’ labels when they select toys for their children.
(E) Choking is the most serious hazard presented to children by toys.


b
Please explain your answers!!


I got B
My own answer was: the accidents not only happen within the age range specified, but this wasn't one of the answer.
Ig B is true, then explicit label can make parents be more aware; thus, prevent more injuries.


Another vote for B. Currently parents think that the labels signify the skills required to play the toy and not their safety implications. Hence it becomes more important to explicitly put safety labels to remove any confusions that customers might have..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Toy labeling law [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2007, 22:25
eyunni wrote:
Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose. The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended. For instance, a “three and up” label is required on toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age. Although the current toy-labeling law has indeed reduced the incidence of injuries to children from toys, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer advocate’s argument?
(A) Certain types of toys have never been associated with injury to children.
(B) Most parents believe that the current labels are recommendations regarding level of cognitive skill.
(C) The majority of children injured by toys are under three years of age.
(D) Many parents do not pay attention to manufacturers’ labels when they select toys for their children.
(E) Choking is the most serious hazard presented to children by toys.


b
Please explain your answers!!


Definitely B.

This question is a bit tricky unless you isolate the argument. Which is that a change in labeling from age to dangers is good.

A. Irrelevant because we're talking about toys with known danger
B. Shows that the current labeling method is ineffective and needs to be changed [Strengthen]
C. Irrelevant because it doesn't strengthen the argument
D. Irrelevant because parents do not pay attention will not be affected by the change anyway.
E. Tempting, but too narrow of a scope. Choking as a hazard doesn't support the hypothesis, but instead diverges the topic away from labeling.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 161
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2007, 14:29
"b"
  [#permalink] 11 Oct 2007, 14:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Consumer advocates are worrying that the competing agendas getgyan 4 07 Oct 2012, 22:02
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this garimavyas 0 14 Jan 2014, 09:16
Consumer Advocate: It is generally true, at least in this kimmyg 4 05 Sep 2005, 11:16
Consumer advocate: Tropical oils are high in saturated fats, WinWinMBA 6 10 May 2005, 14:50
Consumer Advocate: The current obsession with low GMATT73 11 07 May 2005, 19:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.