Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Aug 2014, 15:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Consumer advocate: Weekend morning and weekday afternoon

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Consumer advocate: Weekend morning and weekday afternoon [#permalink] New post 26 Nov 2005, 07:01
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Consumer advocate: Weekend morning and weekday afternoon television advertisements universally tout foods with little or no nutritional value. Children and young teens are the primary television viewers during these periods and as a result are influenced to follow poor nutritional habits, which have been a major factor in the country's obesity problem.

Which of the following, if true, calls into question the logical validity of the argument above?


(A) Children are more influenced in their eating habits by their primary caregivers than they are by advertisements on television or in print.
(B) Food and beverage advertising during prime-time is generally targeted at adult audiences and also primarly advertise unhealthy foods.
(C) Children`s desires for particular foods or beverages are strongly influenced by what they see or hear on television.
(D) Television advertises more products that have dubious or no nutritional value than it does those that do.
(E) Advertisers generally advertise products that market studies show the target audience currently favors.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 998
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Nov 2005, 07:48
A.

Ads are not to blame. Instead, parents are to blame.
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Nov 2005, 10:53
it is a causal argument.

if we can find another cause then it weakens the argument.

A does that. so A is my choice.
_________________

hey ya......

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 232
Location: Germany
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Nov 2005, 13:10
nakib77 wrote:
it is a causal argument.

if we can find another cause then it weakens the argument.

A does that. so A is my choice.


Ditto
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 86
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Weaken #2 [#permalink] New post 26 Nov 2005, 15:04
[quote="GMATT73"]Consumer advocate: Weekend morning and weekday afternoon television advertisements universally tout foods with little or no nutritional value. Children and young teens are the primary television viewers during these periods and as a result are influenced to follow poor nutritional habits, which have been a major factor in the country's obesity problem.

Which of the following, if true, calls into question the logical validity of the argument above?


(A) Children are more influenced in their eating habits by their primary caregivers than they are by advertisements on television or in print.
(B) Food and beverage advertising during prime-time is generally targeted at adult audiences and also primarly advertise unhealthy foods.
(C) Children`s desires for particular foods or beverages are strongly influenced by what they see or hear on television.
(D) Television advertises more products that have dubious or no nutritional value than it does those that do.
(E) Advertisers generally advertise products that market studies show the target audience currently favors.[/quote

OA please.. A does not say that television doesnot influence .It just says that caregivers influence more than telelvision. But it doesnot disqualify the influence of television.

E can also be a contender .It reverses the cause. IT says that A doesnot ahppen becuse of b. On the other hand B occurs becuse of A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 460
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR Weaken #2 [#permalink] New post 26 Nov 2005, 17:41
I would go with A.

Conclusion: children/young teens watch the commercials and that is why they have poor nutrition habits.

We need to prove this wrong and A does just that. If someone else in the house makes the decision about the food, but don't watch the commercials during that time, it would prove the conclusion false.


GMATT73 wrote:
Consumer advocate: Weekend morning and weekday afternoon television advertisements universally tout foods with little or no nutritional value. Children and young teens are the primary television viewers during these periods and as a result are influenced to follow poor nutritional habits, which have been a major factor in the country's obesity problem.

Which of the following, if true, calls into question the logical validity of the argument above?


(A) Children are more influenced in their eating habits by their primary caregivers than they are by advertisements on television or in print.
(B) Food and beverage advertising during prime-time is generally targeted at adult audiences and also primarly advertise unhealthy foods.
(C) Children`s desires for particular foods or beverages are strongly influenced by what they see or hear on television.
(D) Television advertises more products that have dubious or no nutritional value than it does those that do.
(E) Advertisers generally advertise products that market studies show the target audience currently favors.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2005, 16:32
I choose E.

Conclusion says that advertisement influences children into doing something - advertisement is the cause and children choosing bad food is the result.

E reverses this logic. It says advertisers advertise what children already like. This means that children already are eating bad food and therefore there is no question of advertisemtns influencing children's decisions.
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2005, 01:08
I vote for A.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1711
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2005, 01:19
One more 'A'
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2005, 14:42
E.

A says that children are more influenzed. So what more or less, they get influenzed.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2005, 15:21
It's b/tw A & E
I choose A
B-out of scope
C & D-support argument

What is OA?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1711
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2005, 21:09
MATT, can you please post the OA?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 998
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2005, 07:33
gamjatang wrote:
A.

Ads are not to blame. Instead, parents are to blame.


Giving it a second-thought, I switch over to (E).
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn :twisted: !

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2005, 12:52
MATT what is the OA :-D ?
_________________

hey ya......

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2005, 06:28
Sorry for flaking out on the OA guys! Here you go...

OA is E:

OE:

Step 1: ID Question Type and Task
Something that calls into question the logic of the argument will weaken the argument. This is a weaken question.
The task on a weaken question is to find the assumptions in order to attack them.

Step 2: Read the Argument and Extract Necessary Information:
By claiming that the advertisements are the cause for the poor nutritional habits which is the cause of the obesity, the argument should be identified as one of the most common GMAT argument types, the causal argument.
The assumption, as with most causal arguments, is that there is no other possible cause for the poor nutritional habits (and thus the obesity) other than the tv ads.

Step 3: Formulate an Answer to the Question:
To weaken this argument attack the assumption by introducing other possible causes or disprove the indicated cause.

Step 4: Eliminate Answer Choices:
(A) Keep. This choice suggests another possible influence on eating habits.

(B) Irrelevant. This does not attack the assumptions, which are about the causes of poor habits in children.

(C) Strengthens. This supports the assumption that tv ads causes poor habits.

(D) Irrelevant. The fact that more bad are advertised then good does not attack the assumptions about the causes of poor eating habits.

(E) Keep. This introduces that the cause and effect could have been reversed, which would directly attack the assumption.

Step 5: Compare the Remaining Choices:
Choice (A) upon closer examination says that children are more influenced by primary caregivers than by advertisements, which implies that they are influenced by advertisement. (E) however lacks any ambiguity.
  [#permalink] 30 Nov 2005, 06:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Haas EWMBA: Weekday or Weekend cohort - Pros and Cons saintforlife 6 16 Feb 2014, 22:49
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this garimavyas 0 14 Jan 2014, 09:16
GMAT Test Time: Morning or Afternoon. haas_mba07 12 03 Aug 2006, 16:09
Consumer Advocate: It is generally true, at least in this kimmyg 4 05 Sep 2005, 11:16
Consumer Advocate: The current obsession with low GMATT73 11 07 May 2005, 19:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Consumer advocate: Weekend morning and weekday afternoon

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.