Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 08:13 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 08:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 477 [10]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Moscow, Russia
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2003
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Finland
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 342
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 313
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Milwaukee
Send PM
[#permalink]
Agree with B

Key things tested here are usage of correct tense & contrast to complete a thought. Only B gives you both
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
B. "Sagged" requires "tumbled" not "has tumbled". To contrast "but" is required, => A or B. "to give a clear signal" is better than "for giving ...".
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 147
Own Kudos [?]: 322 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC-Consumer [#permalink]
aaron22197 wrote:
Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early indication of the economy’s direction, sagged as the stock market tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving a clear picture of new spending patterns.
(A) tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving
(B) tumbled, but not dramatically enough to give
(C) tumbled, and not so dramatically as to have given
(D) has tumbled, and not dramatically enough to give
(E) has tumbled, but not so dramatically as to give


need to use 'to give'; sagged so tumbled.
B.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2016
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V21
GMAT 2: 620 Q48 V26
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early [#permalink]
Can some one please explain the expression "but not dramatically enough to give" parallel to which part of the sentence
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Quote:
(B) tumbled, but not dramatically enough to give



The word 'but' is also used, though rarely, as a subordinate conjunction meaning 'though.' In such cases, the 'but' is not required to maintain parallelism just as a coordinating conjunction is required to do. The real parsing of the B in this case will be
'tumbled, although not dramatically enough to give' -- Now 'although not dramatically enough to give' is an adverbial modifier modifying the previous clause 'as the stock market tumbled'.
Director
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 583
Own Kudos [?]: 1321 [1]
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Send PM
Re: Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Mikhail wrote:
GMAT Paper Test (Test Code 55), 1996

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 2
Page: 22

Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early indication of the economy’s direction, sagged as the stock market tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving a clear picture of new spending patterns.


(A) tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving - Need "to give" to show intention. Correct Idiom: "enough to".

(B) tumbled, but not dramatically enough to give - Correct

(C) tumbled, and not so dramatically as to have given - Need "but" for contrast.

(D) has tumbled, and not dramatically enough to give - Need "but" for contrast. Need simple past tense "tumbled" instead of present perfect "has tumbled" since this action happened in the past and should be parallel to the simple past tense "sagged".

(E) has tumbled, but not so dramatically as to give - Need simple past tense "tumbled" instead of present perfect "has tumbled" since this action happened in the past and should be parallel to the simple past tense "sagged".
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne