Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfre : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Jan 2017, 03:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfre

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 72 [1] , given: 3

Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfre [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 01:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

60% (02:45) correct 40% (01:46) wrong based on 139 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfrey prepackaged meals are virtually devoid of nutritional value. But the Connorly Report is commissioned by Danto Foods, Ocksenfrey’s largest corporate rival, and early drafts of the report are submitted for approval to Danto Foods’ public relations department. Because of the obvious bias of this report, it is clear that Ocksenfrey’s prepackaged meals really are nutritious.

The reasoning in the consumer’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

(A) treats evidence that there is an apparent bias as evidence that the Connorly Report’s claims are false
(B) draws a conclusion based solely on an unrepresentative sample of Ocksenfrey’s products
(C) fails to take into account the possibility that Ocksenfrey has just as much motivation to create negative publicity for Danto as Danto has to create negative publicity for Ocksenfrey
(D) fails to provide evidence that Danto Foods’ prepackaged meals are not more nutritious than Ocksenfrey’s are
(E) presumes, without providing justification, that Danto Foods’ public relations department would not approve a draft of a report that was hostile to Danto Foods’ products
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If questions jerk in your mind, then give me a KUDOS

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2013
Posts: 110
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 67

Re: Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfre [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2014, 03:54
Hi,

Can some one please explain me above argument and why the option D is correct.

I marked E for the following reasons:
Cause (Danto Food being the Ocksenfrey’s largest corporate rival) and Effect (Ocksenfrey prepackaged meals are virtually devoid of nutritional value)

Please explain the reasoning I am not able to make out any sense.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3709
Followers: 1297

Kudos [?]: 5854 [1] , given: 66

Re: Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfre [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2014, 12:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
creativeminddu wrote:
Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfrey prepackaged meals are virtually devoid of nutritional value. But the Connorly Report is commissioned by Danto Foods, Ocksenfrey’s largest corporate rival, and early drafts of the report are submitted for approval to Danto Foods’ public relations department. Because of the obvious bias of this report, it is clear that Ocksenfrey’s prepackaged meals really are nutritious.

The reasoning in the consumer’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

(A) treats evidence that there is an apparent bias as evidence that the Connorly Report’s claims are false
(B) draws a conclusion based solely on an unrepresentative sample of Ocksenfrey’s products
(C) fails to take into account the possibility that Ocksenfrey has just as much motivation to create negative publicity for Danto as Danto has to create negative publicity for Ocksenfrey
(D) fails to provide evidence that Danto Foods’ prepackaged meals are not more nutritious than Ocksenfrey’s are
(E) presumes, without providing justification, that Danto Foods’ public relations department would not approve a draft of a report that was hostile to Danto Foods’ products

GmatDestroyer2013 wrote:
Hi,
Can some one please explain me above argument and why the option D is correct.
I marked E for the following reasons:
Cause (Danto Food being the Ocksenfrey’s largest corporate rival) and Effect (Ocksenfrey prepackaged meals are virtually devoid of nutritional value)
Please explain the reasoning I am not able to make out any sense.

akash03 wrote:
Can you tell me why option E is wrong and option A is correct??

Dear GmatDestroyer2013 & akash03,
I'm happy to respond. Apparently this is LSAT question, and these are typically a bit harder than than GMAT CR. This is a high quality question, and very tricky.

Let's focus on the exact conclusion. "Because of the obvious bias of this report, it is clear that Ocksenfrey’s prepackaged meals really are nutritious."
The consumer establishes that there would likely be some bias, but from there, makes the extraordinary leap that what the biased parties were saying is wrong, viz. Ocksenfrey’s meals are nutritious. That's a huge leap.

Let's look at (D):
(D) [argument] fails to provide evidence that Danto Foods’ prepackaged meals are not more nutritious than Ocksenfrey’s are
Technically, Danto Food's meals aren't discussed at all. Yes, of course, the folks at Danto Foods would also like to claim that their own meals are nutritious, but technically, the question here analyzes only whether Ocksenfrey’s meals are nutritious, and no explicit comparison to Danto Foods’ meals is made. That's why (D) is not correct.

Let's look at (E):
(E) [argument] presumes, without providing justification, that Danto Foods’ public relations department would not approve a draft of a report that was hostile to Danto Foods’ products
Suppose it were absolutely and objectively true that Ocksenfrey’s meals contain no nutritional value. Well, then, the Connorly Report would be 100% accurate on its own, and Danto Foods’ public relations department would have absolutely no complaint with it. In other words, in order for this fact to be something that comes into play, we need to assume that the conclusion is true. If it really were the case that Ocksenfrey’s meals are highly nutritious, then conceivable that would be threatening to the folks at Danto Food's, and that PR department would block or alter the report. Yes, that would be important, IF Ocksenfrey’s meals really are nutritious, but if Ocksenfrey’s meals are not nutritious, then the Danto Food's PR department is irrelevant. That's why (E) is incorrect.

Choice (A) addresses the big leap made in the concluding line, the leap from the possible existence of bias to a sweeping judgment that the conclusion is wrong. That is too much. Sometimes biased people and biased corporate bodies happen to say things that are true. Obviously biased and obviously wrong don't necessarily go together.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Re: Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfre   [#permalink] 15 May 2014, 12:44
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 The latest report by the Global Initiative for Poverty Reduction (GIPR 5 08 Jan 2016, 02:53
6 A recent report suggests that the increasing popularity 4 20 May 2014, 22:45
We doubt that the latest government report will scare 5 06 Feb 2012, 02:59
2 Consumer income reports produced by the govern- ment 12 15 Dec 2010, 16:38
1 Consumer income reports produced by the government 9 27 Jan 2008, 15:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Consumer: The latest Connorly Report suggests that Ocksenfre

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.