Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 14:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 179
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [2] , given: 0

Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2003, 12:30
2
KUDOS
23
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (02:14) correct 53% (01:22) wrong based on 1425 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning

Please explain the differnece between "as a result of Ving" and "result from"?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by fameatop on 19 Sep 2013, 22:00, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3460
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 862 [0], given: 781

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2003, 13:09
chihao wrote:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning

Please explain the differnece between "as a result of Ving" and "result from"?

little difference in meaning...but there is a difference in how we use it...

1. Y happened resulting from X happening

2. X happened. as a result , y happened

"As a result " is generally "Set off" by a comma in its usage

As a result, the 49ers had to play without their regular quarter back.

The 49ers , as a result, had to play without their regular quarter back.

we cant really use "resulting from" here...

i think here B is the best answer

thanks
praetorian
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2003, 05:54
i will choose B.
D and E seem unidiomatic coz they use "from burning"... never heard.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 98 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2003, 16:18
1
KUDOS
I think C is the best choice.
"increased carbon dioxide resulting from X" is not correct. It should be "increased level of carbon dioxide resulting from X". Since it is expected that cooling would occur in future we should use present continious sentence. If simple past is used then it should be cooling the globe by now.
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 50
Location: Singapore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2004, 19:18

Dont think that increased CO2, or increased "level" of CO2 makes any diff in the paragraph.

In GMAT, I have seldom seen 2 "-ing" in the same sentence.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 187
Location: work chair
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 29 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 01:51
1
KUDOS
chihao wrote:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning

chihao, are you sleeping? people crave for an answer...
meanwhile, i think, the answer is e. c and d do not fit with would. a and b comparing with e are wordy...
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 240
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 08:01
Go with B.

"increased atmospheric carbon dioxide" is the most concise rather than
"carbon dioxide in the atmosphere" - C
"carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase" - D
"atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased "- E

Btwn A and B, "resulting" goes with "would".

Official ans ?
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 09:12
1
KUDOS
chihao has been gone for nearly a month.

I hope he is doing well...
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 179
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2004, 20:05
1
KUDOS
Sorry
I had disappeared for a while time.
Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 992
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 164

Kudos [?]: 1462 [1] , given: 227

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2014, 01:30
1
KUDOS
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of --- increased ACD resulting from the blah blah.. it is not increased ACD resulting from burning fossil fuel -- it is a general fact that burning fossil fuel generate CO2 -- how you can say increased ACD in this context.

(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning (acd that already increased from burning fossil fuel would blah blah )

I think Answer must be E.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2035
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 62

Kudos [?]: 594 [0], given: 355

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2014, 13:38
Alternative OE needed here, not one of the posts clearly explains this question. What the hell is atmospheric carbon dioxide anyways?

Cheers!
J
Intern
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 67 [12] , given: 2

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2014, 11:56
12
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
jlgdr wrote:
Alternative OE needed here, not one of the posts clearly explains this question. What the hell is atmospheric carbon dioxide anyways?

Cheers!
J

Hi jlgdr,

• Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be
o that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe
 by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.

MEANING

• The sentence states something in contrast to the earlier hypotheses. It says:
• It is possible that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide would cool the globe.
o This increase in the atmospheric carbon dioxide resulted from the burning of fossil fuels.
• How can it cool the globe? - by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.

So, now we know what the author wants to convey through the original sentence. Let’s look at the options one by one and find out the errors, if there are any:

OPTION A: Incorrect

‘…increased carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels…’:
Let’s consider a simple example:

India, as a result of win over Australia, moved into the semi-finals.
In this sentence, the action of India moving into the semi-finals happened as a result of India’s win over Australia.
Similarly, option A indicates that the atmospheric carbon dioxide would cool the globe as a result of the burning fossil fuels. This meaning is illogical. The possibility is that the increased atmospheric carbon dioxide would cool the globe.

OPTION B: Correct

The verb-ing modifier ‘resulting’ modifies the preceding noun ‘increased atmospheric carbon dioxide’ and tells us about the reason of the increase in the carbon dioxide.

OPTION C: Incorrect

The result of the combustion of fossil fuels is ‘increased atmospheric carbon dioxide’ not ‘increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere’.
‘Increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere’ is wordy in comparison to ‘increased atmospheric carbon dioxide’.

OPTION D: Incorrect

1. Since ‘that’ refers to ‘carbon dioxide’, it is singular. Hence using plural verb ‘increase’ is incorrect.
2. This option states that the carbon dioxide would cool the globe, while the original sentence stated that the increased carbon dioxide would cool the globe. The meaning is changed.

OPTION E: Incorrect

‘…atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from….’ means that the atmospheric carbon dioxide increased something. ‘increased’ is acting as a verb here for the subject ‘that’. It cannot act as a verb-ed modifier because then there would be no verb in the dependent clause starting with ‘that’.

P.S.: ‘atmospheric carbon dioxide’ simply means the carbon dioxide present in the atmosphere.

Hope this helps!
Manyu
Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 992
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 164

Kudos [?]: 1462 [0], given: 227

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2014, 22:47
Thanks Manyu, I totally missed the error explained by you for option E. Really second that is introducing structural error and eating the verb of preceding subject ACD.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10537
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 May 2015, 09:09
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Optimus Prep Instructor
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1782
Followers: 51

Kudos [?]: 393 [0], given: 21

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 May 2015, 08:55
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning as a result of + noun comes before a consequence, not to describe the cause of the consequence
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and should say "increases"
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide
_________________

# Janielle Williams

Customer Support

Special Offer: $80-100/hr. Online Private Tutoring GMAT On Demand Course$299
Free Online Trial Hour

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10537
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2016, 09:12
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 58
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V34
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 56

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2016, 04:12
Experts please throw some light on this :-
WHY option A is not correct ?
when should I prefer " resulting from " to " as a result of" ?( with an example, please!)
thanks.
Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 53

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2016, 05:19
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning as a result of + noun comes before a consequence, not to describe the cause of the consequence
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and should say "increases"
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide

There is no doubt that B is the right choice,but the questions needs the student to understand the difference between combustion and burning.Doesn't that require outside knowledge?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2353
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 358

Kudos [?]: 1495 [2] , given: 20

Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2016, 06:48
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
techiesam wrote:
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning as a result of + noun comes before a consequence, not to describe the cause of the consequence
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and should say "increases"
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide

There is no doubt that B is the right choice,but the questions needs the student to understand the difference between combustion and burning.Doesn't that require outside knowledge?

The main reason that A is wrong is the usage of "as a result of".

The phrase "as a result of..." cannot directly refer to CO2, but should refer to the formation of CO2 ( either the verb "is formed" directly or the past participle "formed").

The correct construction could be as follows:
"As a result of burning fossile fuels, CO2 is formed." ( adverbial phrase used to refer to the verb "is formed")

Another alternative extension of this usage could be as follows:
Instead of a complete clause, even a past particple "formed" would be acceptable. The structure would then be as follows:
"CO2 formed as a result of burning...."

You are right that people who do not come from mechanical engineering background would not know that combustion is controlled burning. However even for them who consider both these words synonymous, "combustion" would be preferable, since in most cases a concrete noun form is preferred to a gerund form.
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 33

Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2016, 08:51
I would still go for C.
It is wordy in comparison to B,but it signifies continuous tense. The Carbon dioxide would be ever increasing ..
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased   [#permalink] 15 Aug 2016, 08:51
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased 2 03 Dec 2008, 15:53
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased 2 02 Jul 2008, 16:05
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased 1 30 Sep 2007, 11:16
3 Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased 17 09 Aug 2007, 12:30
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased 7 11 May 2007, 11:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by