|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased [#permalink]
 08 Nov 2006, 00:23
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 912
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
B is my choice...
C, D and E are out because the referents are inappropriate...
A is awkward to me, howver is close to correct answer 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
A. As a result of-> Redundant
C. atmospheric carbon dioxide is better than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
D. effusive
E. Same as D..
So I van zero down to B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 0
|
B is good. we want to say the c02 resulting from the combustion...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 749
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
A or B
I can not decide so i'm going with the original. A is my response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
trivikram wrote: Can anyone explain why A is wrong?
I can't find a flaw in the original 
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1481
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 13
|
trivikram wrote: Can anyone explain why A is wrong?
I think as a result of - as Patrannn has explained - is redundant.
Consider this -
AS by itself is used to imply "a result" or "reason". For example, I didn't come to office as I was not well. You wouldn't say I didn't come to office as a result of my sickness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
Pl. explain the difference between increased atmospheric carbon dioxide and increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
_________________
Neelabh Mahesh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Great guys ..OA is B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar
Topics:
|
 |
|
|
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased
|
chihao |
8 |
29 Nov 2003, 13:30 |
|
|
|
|
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased
|
doggita |
2 |
10 Aug 2004, 17:28 |
|
|
|
|
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased
|
WinWinMBA |
5 |
03 Jun 2005, 16:48 |
|
|
|
|
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased
|
sgrover |
3 |
14 Sep 2005, 08:02 |
|
|
|
|
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased
|
leeye84 |
7 |
11 May 2007, 12:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|
close
