Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 16:40 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 16:40

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 118
Own Kudos [?]: 200 [101]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 270 [28]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [16]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 573 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: work chair
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
1
Kudos
chihao wrote:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning

chihao, are you sleeping? people crave for an answer... :-D
meanwhile, i think, the answer is e. c and d do not fit with would. a and b comparing with e are wordy...
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 631
Own Kudos [?]: 2760 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.

(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning
what does "as a result" refer to?
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
correct. resulting refers to increased carbon dioxide.
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
it seems that the practice of increasing would cool..., changing the meaning. moreover, does resulting refer to atmosphere? unclear
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning
that is unclear
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning
wrong tense
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 248
Own Kudos [?]: 1140 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
GMAT 2: 720  Q50  V36
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (noun phrase) resulting from the combustion of burning fossil fuels (participle phrase modifying the noun phrase) would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.

This is not reflected in the C.
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1345
Own Kudos [?]: 2391 [0]
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
Alternative OE needed here, not one of the posts clearly explains this question. What the hell is atmospheric carbon dioxide anyways?

Cheers!
J :)
SVP
SVP
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1798
Own Kudos [?]: 1367 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning as a result of + noun comes before a consequence, not to describe the cause of the consequence
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and should say "increases"
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Fossil fuels (coal, crude oil and natural gas) are those that have been fossilized from millions of years ago. The process of using them is called combustion, which is to ignite them in a closed chamber such as a furnace, an engine etc; Combustion’s main purpose is to harness heat.

On the contrary burning refers to using sources such as wood that are not fossilized but used immediately. Burning is mostly done in open fires. The purpose here would be mostly for lighting and sometimes to generate heat like in cooking.

Base on the above description choices A, D and E. that call usage of fossil fuel as burning are out. Between B and C: Increased atmospheric CO2 means, high level of CO2. This is the correct meaning as in B;

However, it may be that increasing Co2 in the atmosphere may mean two things. 1. Increasing may be an on - going effect or it may mean that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere by some agent; both the prospects are not the intended meaning. So C is out
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 159
Own Kudos [?]: 313 [0]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.
(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning as a result of + noun comes before a consequence, not to describe the cause of the consequence
(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of
(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of
(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide, and should say "increases"
(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning suggests more than one type of atmospheric carbon dioxide


There is no doubt that B is the right choice,but the questions needs the student to understand the difference between combustion and burning.Doesn't that require outside knowledge?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 93 [2]
Given Kudos: 78
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
rsrighosh wrote:
I have read one of the differences is that "as a result of" is preceded by phrase/clause and "resulting from" is preceded by noun or noun phrase.


Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (noun phrase) as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.

as a result of is invalid.. should be replaced byresulting


Does this apply here ?


In my guide book, that is exactly what it says. So yes.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2021
Posts: 338
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 227
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
A vs B.

A) Increased from burning. Not a perfect match between tenses, I guess. If its still burning, it must be increasing.

B) Increased from the combustion of. The combustion can be interpreted as ended and the past tense is justified.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 704
Location: United States
Send PM
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
chihao wrote:
Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning fossil fuels would cool the globe by reducing the amount of solar energy absorbed by snow.

Meaning of the sentence is that an increase in the amount of carbon dioxide from the combustion will cool the globe.


(A) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide as a result of burning

"a result of" should be followed by a clause, but in (A), it's a gerund. OUT

(B) increased atmospheric carbon dioxide resulting from the combustion of

"increased" modifies carbon dioxide and "resulting from" should be followed by a "noun" - which in this case is followed by the "combustion." KEEP

(C) increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from the combustion of

"Increasing"? Carbon dioxide that is in the process of increasing results from the combustion? That's a bit illogical vs. (B). OUT

(D) carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that increase from burning

This choice makes it sound like a specific type of carbon dioxide (the one that increase from burning) is the subject of the sentence. Also, SV error with "increase" - OUT

(E) atmospheric carbon dioxide that increased from burning

Same as (D) - OUT

Please explain the differnece between "as a result of Ving" and "result from"?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2022
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
In my opinion, "increasing carbon dioxide" is not a thing, this alone would be sufficient to eliminate C. How can CO2 increase? only the volume of CO2 may increase.

This is analogous to say something like "rising money spent on national events".
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Contrary to earlier conjectures, it may be that increased atmospheric [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne