Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]
23 Sep 2004, 02:39
85% (02:33) correct
15% (01:43) wrong based on 256 sessions
1. Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has not increased in recent years. Yet, even though prices and production amounts have also been stable during the last three years, sugarcane growers last year increased their profits by more than ten percent over the previous yearâ€™s level.
Any of the following statements, if true about last year, helps to explain the rise in profits EXCEPT: (A) Many countries that are large consumers of sugarcane increased their production of sugarcane-based ethanol, yet their overall consumption of sugarcane decreased. (B) Sugarcane growers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested. (C) The price of oil, the major energy source used by sugarcane growers in harvesting their crops, dropped by over twenty percent. (D) Many small sugarcane growers joined together to form an association of sugarcane producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates. (E) Rainfall in sugarcane-growing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive artificial irrigation.
Eliminated C,D,E for the following reasons.
(C) Price of oil dropped. Decrease in cost price.Profit increases.
(D) Raw material at low rates. So profit increases.
(E) Saved money thru irrigation. Hence, decrease in costs incurred. Profit increases.
Iam not sure between A and B.
I don't totally understand what option A talks about.
(B) talks about paying at an hourly rate instead of paying them by amount harvested. We do not know if the hourly rate is lesser than the
amount that'll be paid for the amount harvested.
So I'll vote for B.
510 on my first GMAT. 610 on second GMAT.!
The struggle continues.
A it is
B talks about sugarcane growers saving money on wages and thus increased their profitability
A talks about supply and demand. It says that sugarcane supply increased and demand decreased. This means that there is an oversupply of sugarcane and either that prices should have come down or sugarcane itself would not sell. It cannot explain why profitability increased
Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]
05 May 2014, 11:27
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has
05 May 2014, 11:27