Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 17:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 52
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [1] , given: 0

Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2008, 13:02
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (02:16) correct 19% (01:27) wrong based on 592 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has not increased in recent years. Yet, even though prices and production amounts have also been stable during the last three years, sugarcane growers last year increased their profits by more than 10% over ther previous year's level.

Any of the following statements, if true about last year, helps to explain the rise in profits EXCEPT:

(A) Many countries that are large consumers of sugarcane increased their production of sugarcane-based ethanol. yet their overall consumption decreased.
(B) Sugarcane growers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested.
(C) The price of the oil, the major energy source used by sugarcane growers in harvesting their crops, dropped by morethan 20%.
(D) Many small sugarcane growers joined together to form an association of sugarcane producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates.
(E) Rainfall in sugarcane-growing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive arificial irrigation.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 157 [2] , given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2008, 13:34
2
KUDOS
Except type questions are slightly tricky. Please rephrase these questions by add following “does not/ will not” in the question.

Rephrase: Any of the following statements, if true about last year, does not help to explain the rise in profits:

(A)Many countries that are large consumers of sugarcane increased their production of sugarcane-based ethanol. yet their overall consumption decreased. [Has nothing to do with the profits]

(B)Sugarcane growers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested. [Lower wages can yield higher profits - contributor to increase rise in profits – eliminate it]

(C)The price of the oil, the major energy source used by sugarcane growers in harvesting their crops, dropped by morethan 20%. [Drop in oil prices – can contribute to profits - eliminate it]

(D)Mnay small sugarcane growers joined together to form an association of sugarcane producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates. [Wholesale purchase can increase profits - eliminate it]

(E)Rainfall in sugarcane-growing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive arificial irrigation. [clear money saver - can increase profits - eliminate it]

Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 52
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2008, 13:37
hanumayamma wrote:
Except type questions are slightly tricky. Please rephrase these questions by add following “does not/ will not” in the question.

Rephrase: Any of the following statements, if true about last year, does not help to explain the rise in profits:

(A)Many countries that are large consumers of sugarcane increased their production of sugarcane-based ethanol. yet their overall consumption decreased. [Has nothing to do with the profits]

(B)Sugarcane growers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested. [Lower wages can yield higher profits - contributor to increase rise in profits – eliminate it]

(C)The price of the oil, the major energy source used by sugarcane growers in harvesting their crops, dropped by morethan 20%. [Drop in oil prices – can contribute to profits - eliminate it]

(D)Mnay small sugarcane growers joined together to form an association of sugarcane producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates. [Wholesale purchase can increase profits - eliminate it]

(E)Rainfall in sugarcane-growing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive arificial irrigation. [clear money saver - can increase profits - eliminate it]

hey it works. ur answer is right E.
can u help me solve out the CR problems. i have my exam date in feb.
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 73
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2008, 13:39
To tackle such kind of questions,replace

'Except'
by 'does not' in the question stem.

Any of the following statements, if true about last year, helps to explain the rise in profits EXCEPT:

can be replaced by

Any of the following statements, if true about last year, does not help to explain the rise in profits

IMO A.
Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 54
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2008, 15:07
I got A as well.

Looking at each statement I determined if it would cause an increase in profits but answer choice A would not increase profits.
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 51

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2011, 09:30
A is clear enough here.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2011
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2011, 00:53
Hi,
What is meant by "supplies" in the statement:"began to buy supplies at low group rates" in option D.
This confused me into thinking, that if the farmers themselves are buying supplies(sugarcane) at low group rates, then the sugarcane is selling at low rate than it would have been sold otherwise, thus reducing the profit.

Do we mean things used to produce sugarcane like seeds,instruments et al by supplies ?

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2021
Followers: 161

Kudos [?]: 1708 [0], given: 376

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2011, 01:00
suyash wrote:
Hi,
What is meant by "supplies" in the statement:"began to buy supplies at low group rates" in option D.
This confused me into thinking, that if the farmers themselves are buying supplies(sugarcane) at low group rates, then the sugarcane is selling at low rate than it would have been sold otherwise, thus reducing the profit.

Do we mean things used to produce sugarcane like seeds,instruments et al by supplies ?

Green part is the correct interpretation. Supplies to produce sugarcane.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 109
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2011, 14:29
vermatanya wrote:
Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has not increased in recent years. Yet, even though prices and production amounts have also been stable during the last three years, sugarcane growers last year increased their profits by more than 10% over ther previous year's level.

Any of the following statements, if true about last year, helps to explain the rise in profits EXCEPT:

(A)Many countries that are large consumers of sugarcane increased their production of sugarcane-based ethanol. yet their overall consumption decreased.
(B)Sugarcane growers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested.
(C)The price of the oil, the major energy source used by sugarcane growers in harvesting their crops, dropped by morethan 20%.
(D)Mnay small sugarcane growers joined together to form an association of sugarcane producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates.
(E)Rainfall in sugarcane-growing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive arificial irrigation.

help me out what the author want to know . m not understanding his point of view.n particularly what i have to search in this type of questions.

-thanx

A. A does not help to explain why farmers made profits but the rest of the choices do.
Manager
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 200
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 21

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2011, 06:19
A doesn't have anything to do with the argument. It's the answer.
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 145
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2011, 09:40
A it is for me too..
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10543
Followers: 920

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2014, 00:17
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2014, 10:22
Hi Everyone,

Argument given is as below -
Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has not increased in recent years. Yet, even though prices and production amounts have also been stable during the last three years, sugarcane growers last year increased their proﬁts by more than 10 percent over the previous year’s level.

Note the bold face marked sentence- it says that production amount has been stable - means production is stable per demand and not reducing.
and Option A says that - "yet their overall consumption of sugarcane decreased" which is opposite to what argument question says.
How A can be the answer if it undermines the argument...

Or may be my interpretation of argument is wrong.

Thanks,
Tanveer
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 28

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2015, 09:32
I have a question on this one.

I was stuck between A and B. B states that growers saved money by switching from hourly wage to paying by amount harvested (or "production amounts"). This can obviously save money and thus, would increase profits, meaning B could not be the answer.

However, it states in the question stem that "production amounts have been stable". That would mean that B could not save money (since production amounts are stable, and wages are now based on production amounts). Wouldn't that mean B could be an answer?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10543
Followers: 920

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2016, 05:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has   [#permalink] 18 Sep 2016, 05:25
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The overall demand for used computers has risen dramatically 6 22 Jul 2012, 19:54
20 Source: Friend A recent study has concluded that, contrary 11 10 May 2011, 00:57
Source: Friend A recent study has concluded that, contrary 3 09 May 2011, 23:33
2 Economist: The law of demand predicts that as the price of a 16 27 Jul 2010, 23:26
21 Escalating worldwide demand for corn has led to a sharp 17 27 Jan 2008, 02:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by