Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 12:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 20:44
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers.

please explain
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 20:48
between A & C, I will choose A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 273
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 20:52
would pick A as the leaders could argue that even though there is not any extra money coming in, the money given to workers has always been too little.
B doesn't weaken the argument, its more about what the labour leaders could do.
C...this was a tempting choice...but just because population is growing does not mean the economy grows as well.
D does not weaken the argument
E is irrelevant
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 141
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 20:58
For me the answer is (A)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 551
Location: Canuckland
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 21:04
A here
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2005, 03:45
why not E
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2005, 03:47
why not E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2005, 11:45
well done chaps. answer is A. i was between A and C. Can someone eleborate on why C is wrong? the question stem clearly says mgts reasoning is that pie is not growing. direct refute to that is C. pie is ineed growing.

any thoughts?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2005, 12:05
Dang, I'd have chosen C :o

I'm still not clear as to why it is A :?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 294
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2005, 05:24
I'll pick A.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 908
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2005, 06:27
I pick C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 83
Location: New York City
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Stagnating Pie [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2005, 07:21
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.

Labor leaders believe that the the distribution is problem and workers are getting small portion, no matter what the productivity does. This doesn't address the argument.

(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.

Off scope

(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.

Correct answer. That the productivity is stagnant and the US population is growing, the unjust differences in the pie are increasing exponentially. In order to make up for this, workers should get more money.

(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.

Off scope

(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers.

Off scope, doesn't address the argument at all.

please explain[/quote]
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 609
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2005, 07:57
I pick C too.

there is no weakness in A, just coffee table chat.

In C we argue why this pie growth actually exists !
  [#permalink] 14 Jun 2005, 07:57
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central noboru 22 19 Apr 2010, 14:22
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central rao 8 07 Sep 2008, 15:44
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central sidbidus 3 18 Jun 2007, 17:47
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central nitinneha 5 27 Mar 2007, 15:07
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central ywilfred 8 07 Sep 2005, 05:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.