Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 May 2013, 16:15
Customize  |  Hide

Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 226
Location: Ohio
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2007, 16:07
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
1. Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 366
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2007, 18:56
I would go with A...

(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.

(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry. labor leaders' situation is irrelevant

(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well. tries to make pop. increase = wage increase statement which is irrelevant

(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management. irrelevant

(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers. not mentioned in the argument therefore cannot be said
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 277
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2007, 20:09
It is A.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2007, 20:34
A.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 226
Location: Ohio
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2007, 20:50
OA is A.

Thanks for the explanation ricokevin.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 251
Schools: Ross, Kellogg, Darden (i/v)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2007, 00:14
ricokevin wrote:
I would go with A...

(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.

(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry. labor leaders' situation is irrelevant

(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well. tries to make pop. increase = wage increase statement which is irrelevant

(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management. irrelevant

(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers. not mentioned in the argument therefore cannot be said

After reading this, I'm convinced A is the answer. Good work rico!
  [#permalink] 28 Mar 2007, 00:14
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central damit 12 12 Jun 2005, 21:44
New posts Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central ywilfred 8 07 Sep 2005, 06:59
New posts Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central vivek123 4 29 Nov 2005, 11:47
New posts Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central vineetgupta 3 09 Nov 2006, 09:11
New posts Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central sidbidus 3 18 Jun 2007, 18:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.