|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 226
Location: Ohio
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central [#permalink]
27 Mar 2007, 16:07
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
1. Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 366
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
I would go with A...
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry. labor leaders' situation is irrelevant
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well. tries to make pop. increase = wage increase statement which is irrelevant
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management. irrelevant
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers. not mentioned in the argument therefore cannot be said
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 277
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 2
|
It is A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 226
Location: Ohio
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
OA is A.
Thanks for the explanation ricokevin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 251
Schools: Ross, Kellogg, Darden (i/v)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
ricokevin wrote: I would go with A...
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry. labor leaders' situation is irrelevant
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well. tries to make pop. increase = wage increase statement which is irrelevant
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management. irrelevant
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers. not mentioned in the argument therefore cannot be said
After reading this, I'm convinced A is the answer. Good work rico!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central
|
damit |
12 |
12 Jun 2005, 21:44 |
|
|
|
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central
|
ywilfred |
8 |
07 Sep 2005, 06:59 |
|
|
|
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central
|
vivek123 |
4 |
29 Nov 2005, 11:47 |
|
|
|
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central
|
vineetgupta |
3 |
09 Nov 2006, 09:11 |
|
|
|
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central
|
sidbidus |
3 |
18 Jun 2007, 18:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|