Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 23:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 15:44
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (02:22) correct 25% (01:40) wrong based on 12 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?

A. Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.

B. If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.

C. Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.

D. As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.

E. The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factorssuch as foreign competitionbeyond the control of American workers.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 185
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 16:07
IMO C.
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 206
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 16:21
rao_1857 wrote:
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?

A. Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.

B. If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.

C. Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.

D. As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.

E. The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factorssuch as foreign competitionbeyond the control of American workers.

From A and C...final winner is A. Labor leaders claim is on the fair distribution.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 242
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2008, 21:01
IMO C.

Its between A and C , but C clearly targets the logical weakness in the argument . The argument also says 'Labor leaders point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits' .. so the point raised by A has been addresses by the argument.
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 181
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 20

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2012, 16:04
IMO C.
As per C, if the economic pie continues to grow, the conclusion - "there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers" is flawed.
Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Posts: 56
Location: United States (WI)
Concentration: Other
Schools: University of Wisconsin (Madison) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q48 V46
GPA: 3.66
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2012, 19:51
The key here is to focus on pointing out a weakness in the logic used.

Quote:
A. Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.

This comment has no bearing on the statement's logical sequence.

Quote:
B. If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.

It seems to me the GMAT tries to appeal to test-takers' emotions in the verbal section - perhaps a trick?

Quote:
C. Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.

This is the only option that focuses on a weakness in the statement's logic.

Quote:
D. As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.

"It's not my problem" does not weaken the statement's logic.

Quote:
E. The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factorssuch as foreign competitionbeyond the control of American workers.

"It's not our fault" does not weaken the statement's logic.
Intern
Joined: 01 Nov 2011
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2012, 13:18
rao wrote:
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?

A. Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.

B. If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.

C. Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.

D. As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.

E. The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factorssuch as foreign competitionbeyond the control of American workers.

Approach :
1) To identify the conclusion i.e. Until productivity resumes its growth,....
2) Which option weekends this??
3) Option C clearly states and factor keeping the productivity stagnant because of growing US population the pie is growing

IMO:C
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 242
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 55

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2012, 11:05
c was nmy choice but the OA is A since C is a bit out of scope

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1426
GPA: 3.77
Followers: 180

Kudos [?]: 853 [0], given: 621

### Show Tags

12 May 2012, 06:01
Topic has been locked, please search through the forum (use search box) to find this particular question that had been discussed before.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Re: another tough one   [#permalink] 12 May 2012, 06:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central 3 12 Jun 2010, 14:47
3 Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central 22 19 Apr 2010, 14:22
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central 18 03 Nov 2008, 10:45
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central 3 18 Jun 2007, 17:47
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central 5 27 Mar 2007, 15:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.