Contraty to the vies of those who oppose recent introduction of the law prohibiting smoking cigarettes, cigars, and pipes in restaurants and other public places, the prohibition is quite justified and long overdue. Those who object would do well to remember tha there is much lefislation in this country - for example, the law against jaywalking- which is an infrigement of civil liberties.
Which of the followings statements about the author's intention is correct?
A) He is pointing out that the opponents rationalization of the argument leads to an unreasonable conclusion.
not at all,,,both author and opponents conclusions are same
B) He attacks his opponents because they are self interested smokers.
C) He points out that his antagonists arguments lead to a choice between equaly undesireable alternatives.
he does'nt give any choice
D) He is attempting to draw and analogy between restricting a person's freedom to cross a busy road anywhere one pleases and banning smoking in public places.
this is the best as author metions second to explain the opponent frist point
E) He demonstrates that the law against jaywalking applies in this country, as well as other democracies, in which civil liberties is paramount
.there is no demonstartion just a comment,,,,moreover there is no metion about other democarcies.
i hate when people do'nt post the OA, it leaves in guessing!!!!