alphabeta1234 wrote:
"In my opinion UNC is much more of a regional brand"
- UNC-Chapel Hill regional? How?? The Kennan-Flagler school ranks 18th on USNews and 13th on Forbes of the best B-schools out there and has so for years. It's in the 98th-99th percentile of business schools out there. Some of the best named firms from all over the country recruit there.
I think you should ask Paul Parker Head of M&A at Goldman Sachs if UNC-CH is regional.
UNC-CH is no more regional to Cornell than Northwestern would be to U-Chicago. But I presume in your mind Northwestern would be more regional compared to a larger, more national and prestigious university such as such as U-Chicago.
I agree with this. If you're arguing UNC is regionally you could also argue that Johnson is. Look at their employment report, I think the number was somewhere around 75% of graduates in New York or New England. Conversely, I would UNC is pretty strong in the south and mid Atlantic. Now, both have very recognizable brands that will help you go anywhere, but the employment report for both schools paints a picture of regional strengths. Which is why, if I were you, I'd base the decision on where you want to work when you graduate. UNC is probably more likely to get you connections at MBB Atlanta, while Cornell is probably stronger at MBB New York.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk