Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Sep 2014, 04:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Cornell vs UT Austin

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Cornell vs UT Austin [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2010, 08:54
want to ask ppl's thoughts on which school is better for corporate finance? if despite considering the region or $$

thanks guys
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Badgerine!
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 894
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE: Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 61

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 86

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: Cornell vs UT Austin [#permalink] New post 25 Apr 2010, 13:17
I believe Cornell has a better reputation within the finance community, but UT will definitely be more valuable for jobs in Texas.
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 170
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 2

Re: Cornell vs UT Austin [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2010, 07:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
I'd probably agree but you can't say "without considering geography". Geography is a huge part of the decision. A school ranked 60 in Washington state is probably "better" for finance than a school ranked 20 on the east coast if you want to work in Seatle. You can learn corp finance in a few weekends at barnes and noble. B school is far more about network than book knowledge.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Cornell vs UT Austin [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2010, 09:06
merkin wrote:
I'd probably agree but you can't say "without considering geography". Geography is a huge part of the decision. A school ranked 60 in Washington state is probably "better" for finance than a school ranked 20 on the east coast if you want to work in Seatle. You can learn corp finance in a few weekends at barnes and noble. B school is far more about network than book knowledge.


thanks you all sharing the thoughts! actually i want to stay at west coast (LA) after mba. thats why i wonder which one will be better in LA. I personally think cornell has better brand but austin also has solid program plus strong network at tx.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 170
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 2

Re: Cornell vs UT Austin [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2010, 09:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
superdkny wrote:
merkin wrote:
I'd probably agree but you can't say "without considering geography". Geography is a huge part of the decision. A school ranked 60 in Washington state is probably "better" for finance than a school ranked 20 on the east coast if you want to work in Seatle. You can learn corp finance in a few weekends at barnes and noble. B school is far more about network than book knowledge.


thanks you all sharing the thoughts! actually i want to stay at west coast (LA) after mba. thats why i wonder which one will be better in LA. I personally think cornell has better brand but austin also has solid program plus strong network at tx.


I think you hit upon an interesting nuance of school selection. That is, if you are looking to work outside of the school's dominant region, you are better off going with the best national brand, rather than the "best" MBA program ( from a rankings perspective). That brand is driven largely by undergrad reputation. For example, let's say you want to work in California post- grad, but for whatever reason you are only looking at schools in Texas and the southeast. Putting aside whatever Cali network those schools might have, you are probably best served by attending Rice or Vanderbilt because people who know little about MBA rankings will assume that those are excellent programs due to their associated undergraduate reputation. Those obviously are excellent schools but not better mba programs than Texas or Emory in their respective markets, at least per "the rankings".

So for that reason, I would go with Cornell in your case, even if it was ranked 15 spots lower than Texas. Just my 2c.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Cornell vs UT Austin [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2010, 09:39
merkin wrote:
superdkny wrote:
merkin wrote:
I'd probably agree but you can't say "without considering geography". Geography is a huge part of the decision. A school ranked 60 in Washington state is probably "better" for finance than a school ranked 20 on the east coast if you want to work in Seatle. You can learn corp finance in a few weekends at barnes and noble. B school is far more about network than book knowledge.


thanks you all sharing the thoughts! actually i want to stay at west coast (LA) after mba. thats why i wonder which one will be better in LA. I personally think cornell has better brand but austin also has solid program plus strong network at tx.


I think you hit upon an interesting nuance of school selection. That is, if you are looking to work outside of the school's dominant region, you are better off going with the best national brand, rather than the "best" MBA program ( from a rankings perspective). That brand is driven largely by undergrad reputation. For example, let's say you want to work in California post- grad, but for whatever reason you are only looking at schools in Texas and the southeast. Putting aside whatever Cali network those schools might have, you are probably best served by attending Rice or Vanderbilt because people who know little about MBA rankings will assume that those are excellent programs due to their associated undergraduate reputation. Those obviously are excellent schools but not better mba programs than Texas or Emory in their respective markets, at least per "the rankings".

So for that reason, I would go with Cornell in your case, even if it was ranked 15 spots lower than Texas. Just my 2c.


thanks a lot. i think it is very helpful. i guess i still have some time to think about this problem. maybe i will see you in texas this summer!
Re: Cornell vs UT Austin   [#permalink] 26 Apr 2010, 09:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Notre Dame vs UT-Austin FutureCPA1585 0 24 Feb 2012, 18:52
USC vs UT Austin (help!) badini0891 5 23 Feb 2012, 23:54
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic USC Marshall vs UT-Austin McCombs EndDream 10 11 May 2010, 17:26
UT-Austin vs. UNC-Chapel Hill Hampster 5 11 Feb 2010, 19:15
UT Austin Vs Notre Dame limitlesssky 5 22 Mar 2006, 14:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Cornell vs UT Austin

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.