Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Aug 2014, 04:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 372
Schools: Kellogg School of Management
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for [#permalink] New post 25 Apr 2006, 18:39
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation’s profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger: it contributed 45 percent of the corporation’s profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.
On the basis of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?
(A) The increase in the pharmaceutical division’s contribution to corporation profits could have resulted largely from the introduction of single, important new product.
(B) In multidivisional corporations that have pharmaceutical divisions, over half of the corporation’s profits usually come from the pharmaceuticals.
(C) The percentage of the corporation’s profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division’s performance had not improved.
(D) The information cited does not make it possible to determine whether the 20 percent share of profits cited was itself an improvement over the year before.
(E) The information cited does not make it possible to compare the performance of the chemical and pharmaceutical divisions in of the percent of total profits attributable to each.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Apr 2006, 18:47
It's C.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Apr 2006, 18:53
Indeed it should be C.

The share of the pharma department may have increased in the total pie even when there was no improvement in pharma division b'coz the share of chemical department has decreased.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1902
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: pharma companies [#permalink] New post 25 Apr 2006, 19:13
prude_sb wrote:
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation’s profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger: it contributed 45 percent of the corporation’s profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.
On the basis of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?

(C) The percentage of the corporation’s profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division’s performance had not improved.


IMO, this CR asks about the assumption which weakens the conclusion, and the type of this assumption question is cause-and-effect.

To find the correct answer choice, it's best to ask whether there're alternative causes. Here, the increase in contribution of pharmaceutical division to the company's profit may not be due to the improvement in performance but due to the decreased contribution level of chemical division ( that's why this CR mentions about "chemical division" )

C provides us an open to alternative causes.

Go for C.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 662
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2006, 00:52
C it is.. has been discussed before.
  [#permalink] 26 Apr 2006, 00:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 Experts publish their posts in the topic Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for feruz77 10 01 Nov 2010, 07:39
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for myc2004 4 12 Apr 2006, 02:55
Experts publish their posts in the topic Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for karun_aggarwal 4 09 Apr 2005, 10:48
1 Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for nocilis 10 16 Feb 2005, 19:32
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for chunjuwu 1 11 Dec 2004, 18:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.