Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 09 Jul 2014, 23:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2007, 11:52
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation’s profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger: it contributed 45 percent of the corporation’s profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.
On the basis of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?
(A) The increase in the pharmaceutical division’s contribution to corporation profits could have resulted largely from the introduction of single, important new product.
(B) In multidivisional corporations that have pharmaceutical divisions, over half of the corporation’s profits usually come from the pharmaceuticals.
(C) The percentage of the corporation’s profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division’s performance had not improved.
(D) The information cited does not make it possible to determine whether the 20 percent share of profits cited was itself an improvement over the year before.
(E) The information cited does not make it possible to compare the performance of the chemical and pharmaceutical divisions in of the percent of total profits attributable to each.

pls exp ur ans.thanx
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Yeah answer is C [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2007, 12:39
Ok I first looked at this and could not delineate the difference in principal between C and D. Both, ostensibly, referenced the clear weakness in the argument which is a comparison of percentages from one year to the next does itself not quantify improvement because the rest of the corporation could have lagged considerably allowing for a greater percentage of profit to be attributable to the pharmaceutical division even if that division had the same or worse even fiscal performance from the year before.

That said, C and D both expose this weakness equally, but then I realized that the passage says "from 20 percent" not "up 20 percent" meaning D is actually not the same as what C is saying.

Answer is C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 385
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2007, 14:06
I concur
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Yeah answer is C [#permalink] New post 18 Jan 2009, 20:32
dr908 wrote:
Ok I first looked at this and could not delineate the difference in principal between C and D. Both, ostensibly, referenced the clear weakness in the argument which is a comparison of percentages from one year to the next does itself not quantify improvement because the rest of the corporation could have lagged considerably allowing for a greater percentage of profit to be attributable to the pharmaceutical division even if that division had the same or worse even fiscal performance from the year before.

That said, C and D both expose this weakness equally, but then I realized that the passage says "from 20 percent" not "up 20 percent" meaning D is actually not the same as what C is saying.

Answer is C.


thanks for explanation.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: More of CR [#permalink] New post 18 Jan 2009, 21:26
IMO C...does anybody know the OA for this?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
Re: More of CR [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2009, 12:53
IMO C.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 115
Location: NYC Baby!!!
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: More of CR [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2009, 15:03
I pick C because they are only mentioning the portion that each department contributes to the total profits, and since the chemical dept brought in less this year, the pharm dept portion picked up the remaining percentage and it doesn't mean sales are up, just means they account for more of the profits this year.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: More of CR [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2009, 17:12
Typical percentage and total Q. C again
Re: More of CR   [#permalink] 19 Jan 2009, 17:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for noboru 27 23 Aug 2009, 10:13
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for myc2004 4 12 Apr 2006, 02:55
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for nakib77 7 27 Oct 2005, 13:17
Experts publish their posts in the topic Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for karun_aggarwal 4 09 Apr 2005, 10:48
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for chunjuwu 1 11 Dec 2004, 18:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.