Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 May 2013, 03:26
Customize  |  Hide

corporations

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 277
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
corporations [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2005, 21:06
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

Yorco and Zortech are two corporations that employ large numbers of full-time workers who are paid by the hour. Publicly available records indicate that Yorco employs roughly the same number of such hourly wage workers as Zortech does but spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers. Therefore, hourly wages must be higher, on average, at Yorco than at Zortech, since _____.


Zortech spends a higher total sum per year than Yorco does to provide its hourly wage workers with benefits other than wages
the work performed by hourly wage workers at Zortech does not require a significantly higher level of skill than the work performed by hourly wage workers at Yorco does
the proportion of all company employees who are hourly wage workers is significantly greater at Yorco than it is at Zortech
overtime work, which is paid at a substantially higher rate than work done during the regular work week, is rare at both Yorco and Zortech
the highest hourly wages paid at Yorco are higher than the highest hourly wages paid at Zortech
_________________

"Forums are meant to benefit all. No one is interested in knowing what your guesses are. Please explain the reasoning behind the answer you chose. This will also help you organize your thoughts quickly during the exam."

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 392
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2005, 21:28
I will go for D. Though I am also inclined towards B also but I think D provides an ASSUMPTIOM that if not specified can be called for DEBATE.

D for me.

Saurabh Malpani
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 738
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2005, 21:37
E? not too sure..
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1581
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2005, 22:16
I am with B..........
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: corporations [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2005, 23:24
[quote="pb_india"]Which of the following most logically completes the argument?


(A)Zortech spends a higher total sum per year than Yorco does to provide its hourly wage workers with benefits other than wages
non-wage benefits has nothing to do with wages
Wrong

(B)the work performed by hourly wage workers at Zortech does not require a significantly higher level of skill than the work performed by hourly wage workers at Yorco does
Doesn't follow the comparison laid out in the question. It is perfectly possible that Z has easier jobs but still higher wages
Wrong

(C)the proportion of all company employees who are hourly wage workers is significantly greater at Yorco than it is at Zortech
Contraditary with info already provided
Wrong

(D)overtime work, which is paid at a substantially higher rate than work done during the regular work week, is rare at both Yorco and Zortech
Correct. If over time is not rare in Y but rare in Z, then it might be a reason why Y spends more money than Z, even if Y's average wage is not higher than Z. Getting rid of this probability will be able to support the conclusion arrived in the last sentence of the opening question

(E)the highest hourly wages paid at Yorco are higher than the highest hourly wages paid at Zortech
Highest wage says nothing about average wages
Wrong
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jan 2005, 17:32
(D)
I think we need to find something, that could be a reason for explaining why Y spent more than Z and then neutralize that reason, leaving us with the only option of concluding that the average hourly wage at Y is greater that that at Z for the employees.
  [#permalink] 23 Jan 2005, 17:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Corporate Survival Titleist 3 03 Nov 2005, 21:31
New posts Corporate Lessons sm176811 4 31 Oct 2006, 05:06
New posts corporate finance Amardeep Sharma 2 25 Nov 2007, 18:09
New posts Corporate Finance CaliCpa 0 26 Apr 2009, 20:06
New posts Corporate finance/corporate development BLJ21 2 01 Mar 2011, 06:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

corporations

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.