Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 19:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2006, 14:49
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

55% (01:54) correct 45% (01:08) wrong based on 266 sessions
Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?

(A) Postal workers are representative of service workers in general.
(B) The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.
(C) Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.
(D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
(E) The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1541
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 39

 [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2006, 15:01
A
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Measuriing productivity [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2006, 15:25
should be D
more letters lost alludes to qos (quality of service) issues
so, the author doubts that -
(D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.

ayushi wrote:
..What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?


Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

Re: CR - Measuriing productivity [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2006, 18:28
It's B.
A postal worker may deliver 1000 letters but misdeliver/lose an equal number or more. According to the current measure of productivity, the worker is highly productive.

So, the objection is that other criteria such as prompt delivery and proper handling of mail should also be considered in measuring productivity.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2006, 18:29
Interesting, 3 different people, ... 3 different answers :lol:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Measuriing productivity [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2006, 18:41
one more D. The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.

appropriately is a key word. Author says quality of service is important. D says it is ok to ignore quality of service. Authors doubts D
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 268
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR - Measuriing productivity [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2006, 19:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
d for me.

ayushi wrote:
Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?
(A) Postal workers are representative of service workers in general.
(B) The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.
(C) Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.
(D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
(E) The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2006, 03:25
One more D. The objection raise din the argument brings into question the quality of delivery.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2006, 03:33
A , B and e are not relevent.

C is close but not.

D survives.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2006, 17:54
Hard, but I am for E.
3 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1898
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 110 [3] , given: 0

Re: CR - Measuriing productivity [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2006, 18:37
3
This post received
KUDOS
Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?
(A) Postal workers are representative of service workers in general.
----> the question is about the doubt of the opponents , not about the reasoning in the argument so we can't choose A simply because postal workers may or may not be representative of the service workers!

(B) The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.
----> it's clearly of the point ....the oppopents have no doubt about whether delivery of letters is the primary activity of postal service.

(C) Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.
-----> off the point.

(D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
-----> yes! WE don't base the measure of productivy solely on quantity but also on quality of the service ---->"What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?" , isn't this question about quality of the delivery?!

(E) The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.
-------> this is one-sided consideration ----> it's about quantity only, whereas the opponents raise the question about quality.

D stands.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 213
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2006, 07:28
I go for (A)
ayushi - Pls. post the OA and OE
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2006, 13:04
OA is D...sorry again no OE for this question..


Guys sorry for my late OA posting..will make it a point to post the OA's and OE's (if i have any) soon...

Anyway thank you all of you for your input..
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 532
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2006, 15:03
Agree D.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 385
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2006, 17:16
Its D , This is from OG 11 , you should find the OE in there.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2006, 11:26
One more for D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 174
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

CR- Postal workers [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 11:56
Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?

(A) Postal workers are the representative of service workers in general

(B) The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service

(C) Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals

(D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity

(E) The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 76
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

i would pick B [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 12:05
B?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 12:09
My answer is D.

The question stem is very complex, i am not sure if i understood it right.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2007
Posts: 288
Location: The 408
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- Postal workers [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 12:13
(E) is related to the objection
Re: CR- Postal workers   [#permalink] 26 Jul 2007, 12:13
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which measures the dollar dentobizz 1 30 Sep 2013, 20:46
18 Experts publish their posts in the topic Three workers have a productivity ratio of 1 to 2 to 3. All phoenix9801 11 01 Jun 2012, 10:16
Experts publish their posts in the topic Wiki pages not displayed correctly toDoorNot 2 23 Jan 2008, 14:18
% of questions answered correctly fawreel902 1 20 Jul 2007, 18:50
Please underline the SCs correctly .... Futuristic 0 20 Sep 2006, 10:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 43 posts ] 



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.