Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 04:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR 1000: Air pollution in Los Diablos

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

CR 1000: Air pollution in Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2007, 22:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Please provide answer with explaination...

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.

Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 86
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Air pollution in Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2007, 06:04
vsaxena wrote:
Please provide answer with explaination...

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.

Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.


A- helps to prove why smog alerts dropped to 16 in 1989
B- helps to prove why smog alerts dropped to 16 in 1989
C- helps to prove why smog alerts dropped to 16 in 1989
D- does not help because statement does not tell what kind of industries were exempted whether they had any effect on air-pollution before exemption
E- helps to prove why smog alerts dropped to 16 in 1989

My take is D.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 497
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2007, 06:12
Wow, this is a tough one.

A cannot be right since it explains the act was put in the effect in 1988, therefore, in 1989 the level starts to decrease.

B might not be right since the invention of the new and more accurate spectrometer could measure the pollutant level more accurately, therefore cause the level to decrease.

C cannot be right because some of the pollutants were count as unhealthful before might not count as unhealthful according to the new scale, therefore explains the level

D cannot be right because some of the industries were not accounted for as pollution control measure, therefore the level dropped

E, I don't know. This is the only chose left I might choose if it is on a test day although it does seem somehow related as well. It is the word excess made me uncomfortable here.

But this is just my 2 cents. Open to discussion.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 86
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2007, 06:21
eileen1017 wrote:
Wow, this is a tough one.

A cannot be right since it explains the act was put in the effect in 1988, therefore, in 1989 the level starts to decrease.

B might not be right since the invention of the new and more accurate spectrometer could measure the pollutant level more accurately, therefore cause the level to decrease.

C cannot be right because some of the pollutants were count as unhealthful before might not count as unhealthful according to the new scale, therefore explains the level

D cannot be right because some of the industries were not accounted for as pollution control measure, therefore the level dropped

E, I don't know. This is the only chose left I might choose if it is on a test day although it does seem somehow related as well. It is the word excess made me uncomfortable here.

But this is just my 2 cents. Open to discussion.


Question asks if statement is true (so think of it as true, either it makes sense or not) which is the LEAST helpful. Now analyze all options considering option is true, does it help to explain the behavior between 86-89?
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000: Air pollution in Los Diablos [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2007, 18:59
vsaxena wrote:
Please provide answer with explaination...

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.

Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.


My say is B. I think ive seen this b/f.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2007, 22:05
Thank you all for sharing your thoughts. The OA is 'B'.

Actually if we reconsider the answer choices, all except 'B' tend to support the explaination for pollution levels between 1986 and 1989. We need to choose the LEAST relevant explaination for the pollution levels.

My explaination for D- Smog alerts in 1988 might have increased because of relaxed pollution control measures extended to the specific industries by the mayor.

My explaination for B- The spectrometer invented in Dec 1988 was far more accurate. But does it explain the "falling" pollution level in 1989. An accurate spectrometer may as well record 40 instead of 16!!
  [#permalink] 01 Nov 2007, 22:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR: air pollutants lexis 25 26 Jun 2008, 01:56
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air cybera 9 14 Jul 2005, 13:51
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air mbamantra 13 26 Apr 2005, 07:31
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air karun_aggarwal 0 09 Apr 2005, 15:07
CR: AIR POLLUTION Dr_Friedrich 7 18 Jan 2005, 17:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR 1000: Air pollution in Los Diablos

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.