cr_1000 - Finance Minister : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 03:01
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

cr_1000 - Finance Minister

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

cr_1000 - Finance Minister [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2006, 10:29
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:28) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Without information that could only have come from someone present at the secret meeting between the finance minister and the leader of the opposition party, the newspaper story that forced the finance minister to resign could not have been written. No one witnessed the meeting, however, except the minister’s aide. It is clear, therefore, that the finance minister was ultimately brought down, not by any of his powerful political enemies, but by his own trusted aide.

The argument commits which one of the following errors of reasoning?

(A) drawing a conclusion on the basis of evidence that provides equally strong support for a competing conclusion

(B) assuming without warrant that if one thing cannot occur without another thing’s already having occurred, then the earlier thing cannot occur without bringing about the later thing

(C) confusing evidence that a given outcome on one occasion was brought about in a certain way with evidence that the same outcome on a different occasion was brought about in that way

(D) basing its conclusion on evidence that is almost entirely irrelevant to the point at issue

(E) treating evidence that a given action contributed to bringing about a certain effect as though that evidence established that the given action by itself was sufficient to bring about that effect
_________________

"To hell with circumstances; I create opportunities." - Bruce Lee

Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1065
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2006, 11:24
Is it A?

The culprit could either be the minister's aide or the opp. party leader.
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 632
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2006, 15:39
I am between E and B but, choose ^ B ^ here.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1348
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2006, 16:54
giddi77 wrote:
Is it A? The culprit could either be the minister's aide or the opp. party leader.


i also think A cuz the opp leader could have realeased the information.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 91
Location: Minneapolis
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2006, 23:32
A.
Evidence remains the same but conclusion will be different if opposing leader leaked the information.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2006, 08:47
OA is A
_________________

"To hell with circumstances; I create opportunities." - Bruce Lee

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 328
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2006, 15:17
late but A
  [#permalink] 19 Mar 2006, 15:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
CR 1000 calvinhobbes 0 18 Mar 2010, 08:23
4 CR1000? nyxjf 3 21 Jun 2008, 16:38
CR_1000 el1981 0 25 Feb 2008, 07:18
CR 1000 - Zeria mbagal1 10 24 Feb 2007, 05:38
CR-1000-Your Opinion karan73 4 14 Jan 2007, 18:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

cr_1000 - Finance Minister

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.