Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Aug 2014, 08:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

CR [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2003, 08:32
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
i had problem answering this cud someone explain the reasoning:

Having just completed Logic subject, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:

MAJOR PREMISE: The mountain tiger is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an mountain tiger.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The reasoning of the author's example is most similar to that contained in which of the following arguments?

a. Any endangered species must be protected; this species is endangered; therefore, it should be protected.

b. All seals are mammals; this animal is a seal; therefore, this animal is a mammal.

c. Engaging in sexual intercourse with a person to whom one is not married is a sin; and since premarital intercourse is, by definition, without the institution of marriage, it is, therefore, a sin.

d.There are 60 seconds in a minute; there are 60 minutes in an hour; therefore, there are 3600 seconds in an hour.

e.Wealthy people pay most of the taxes; this man is wealthy; therefore, this man pays most of the taxes.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Location: Hockeytown
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2003, 22:12
arun wrote:
i had problem answering this cud someone explain the reasoning:

Having just completed Logic subject, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:

MAJOR PREMISE: The mountain tiger is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an mountain tiger.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The reasoning of the author's example is most similar to that contained in which of the following arguments?

a. Any endangered species must be protected; this species is endangered; therefore, it should be protected.

b. All seals are mammals; this animal is a seal; therefore, this animal is a mammal.

c. Engaging in sexual intercourse with a person to whom one is not married is a sin; and since premarital intercourse is, by definition, without the institution of marriage, it is, therefore, a sin.

d.There are 60 seconds in a minute; there are 60 minutes in an hour; therefore, there are 3600 seconds in an hour.

e.Wealthy people pay most of the taxes; this man is wealthy; therefore, this man pays most of the taxes.


My logic says it's (B).

Normally, on these types of questions I like to assign a variable to each of the statements. For example:

"The mountain tiger is disappearing" = X is Y.
"This animal is a mountain tiger" = Z is X.
"Therefore, this animal is disappearing" = Z is Y.

The statement that follows the patterns of the variables above will be the best answer. It looks like only B does this.

Looking at the choices, D should be thrown out right away, since it's not a syllogism. C isn't either; it's definitional. E is awkward because one man is not going to pay most of the taxes.

Choice A is close, but it only has elements X (endangered species) and Y (the fact that such a species must remain protected). It never introduces a syllogism.

Hope this helps.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 72
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2003, 05:04
arun wrote:
i had problem answering this cud someone explain the reasoning:

Having just completed Logic subject, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:

MAJOR PREMISE: The mountain tiger is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an mountain tiger.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The reasoning of the author's example is most similar to that contained in which of the following arguments?

a. Any endangered species must be protected; this species is endangered; therefore, it should be protected.

b. All seals are mammals; this animal is a seal; therefore, this animal is a mammal.

c. Engaging in sexual intercourse with a person to whom one is not married is a sin; and since premarital intercourse is, by definition, without the institution of marriage, it is, therefore, a sin.

d.There are 60 seconds in a minute; there are 60 minutes in an hour; therefore, there are 3600 seconds in an hour.

e.Wealthy people pay most of the taxes; this man is wealthy; therefore, this man pays most of the taxes.


I would vote for E.
what is the rigth one?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 21 Jun 2003, 11:08
arun wrote:
i had problem answering this cud someone explain the reasoning:

Having just completed Logic subject, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:

MAJOR PREMISE: The mountain tiger is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an mountain tiger.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The reasoning of the author's example is most similar to that contained in which of the following arguments?

a. Any endangered species must be protected; this species is endangered; therefore, it should be protected.

b. All seals are mammals; this animal is a seal; therefore, this animal is a mammal.

c. Engaging in sexual intercourse with a person to whom one is not married is a sin; and since premarital intercourse is, by definition, without the institution of marriage, it is, therefore, a sin.

d.There are 60 seconds in a minute; there are 60 minutes in an hour; therefore, there are 3600 seconds in an hour.

e.Wealthy people pay most of the taxes; this man is wealthy; therefore, this man pays most of the taxes.


It is NOT A ( should , instead of must )
It is NOT C ( only two statements )
It is NOT D

SO it's between B & E , and I would go with B
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Location: Hockeytown
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 21 Jun 2003, 21:22
bboroda wrote:
arun wrote:
i had problem answering this cud someone explain the reasoning:

Having just completed Logic subject, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:

MAJOR PREMISE: The mountain tiger is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an mountain tiger.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The reasoning of the author's example is most similar to that contained in which of the following arguments?

a. Any endangered species must be protected; this species is endangered; therefore, it should be protected.

b. All seals are mammals; this animal is a seal; therefore, this animal is a mammal.

c. Engaging in sexual intercourse with a person to whom one is not married is a sin; and since premarital intercourse is, by definition, without the institution of marriage, it is, therefore, a sin.

d.There are 60 seconds in a minute; there are 60 minutes in an hour; therefore, there are 3600 seconds in an hour.

e.Wealthy people pay most of the taxes; this man is wealthy; therefore, this man pays most of the taxes.


It is NOT A ( should , instead of must )
It is NOT C ( only two statements )
It is NOT D

SO it's between B & E , and I would go with B


Can't get confused with (E). You can't go from "wealthy people" to one wealthy man - this is the logical flaw.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 72
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2003, 23:33
JP wrote:
bboroda wrote:
arun wrote:
i had problem answering this cud someone explain the reasoning:

Having just completed Logic subject, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:

MAJOR PREMISE: The mountain tiger is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an mountain tiger.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The reasoning of the author's example is most similar to that contained in which of the following arguments?

a. Any endangered species must be protected; this species is endangered; therefore, it should be protected.

b. All seals are mammals; this animal is a seal; therefore, this animal is a mammal.

c. Engaging in sexual intercourse with a person to whom one is not married is a sin; and since premarital intercourse is, by definition, without the institution of marriage, it is, therefore, a sin.

d.There are 60 seconds in a minute; there are 60 minutes in an hour; therefore, there are 3600 seconds in an hour.

e.Wealthy people pay most of the taxes; this man is wealthy; therefore, this man pays most of the taxes.


It is NOT A ( should , instead of must )
It is NOT C ( only two statements )
It is NOT D

SO it's between B & E , and I would go with B


Can't get confused with (E). You can't go from "wealthy people" to one wealthy man - this is the logical flaw.


but you have the same flaw in the premises: you go from tiger as a class (which is disappearing) to only one tiger. Thus E has the closest logic.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 142
Location: Hockeytown
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 24 Jun 2003, 13:04
Dmitry wrote:
JP wrote:
bboroda wrote:
arun wrote:
i had problem answering this cud someone explain the reasoning:

Having just completed Logic subject, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:

MAJOR PREMISE: The mountain tiger is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an mountain tiger.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.

Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The reasoning of the author's example is most similar to that contained in which of the following arguments?

a. Any endangered species must be protected; this species is endangered; therefore, it should be protected.

b. All seals are mammals; this animal is a seal; therefore, this animal is a mammal.

c. Engaging in sexual intercourse with a person to whom one is not married is a sin; and since premarital intercourse is, by definition, without the institution of marriage, it is, therefore, a sin.

d.There are 60 seconds in a minute; there are 60 minutes in an hour; therefore, there are 3600 seconds in an hour.

e.Wealthy people pay most of the taxes; this man is wealthy; therefore, this man pays most of the taxes.


It is NOT A ( should , instead of must )
It is NOT C ( only two statements )
It is NOT D

SO it's between B & E , and I would go with B


Can't get confused with (E). You can't go from "wealthy people" to one wealthy man - this is the logical flaw.


but you have the same flaw in the premises: you go from tiger as a class (which is disappearing) to only one tiger. Thus E has the closest logic.


I still say (B). If tigers as a class are disappearing, there is a chance that a subset (1 tiger) is disappearing. If "wealthy people" pay "most of the taxes," there is essentially no chance that one man is paying "most of the taxes."
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2003, 00:43
The answer should be E. The first premise refers to tigers as a group. The second refer to one particular tiger. It is flawed because the conclusion attempts to incorporate both meanings. This is the same for answer E.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 182
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2008, 04:41
e for me
Re: CR   [#permalink] 24 Sep 2008, 04:41
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
CR Balvinder 17 08 Aug 2007, 05:20
CR FN 4 21 Oct 2005, 18:41
CR FN 2 12 Oct 2005, 17:26
cr forrestgump 5 05 Aug 2005, 21:28
CR harshi 8 11 Mar 2005, 14:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.