NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 19:14 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 19:14
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
 1   2   
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
MamtaKrishnia
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 1358 [456]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   15 Jul 2008, 09:20
50
Kudos
403
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

29% (02:12) correct 71% (02:24) wrong based on 6230 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines. It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs
(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future
(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time
(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes
(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company

TWIN QUESTION: https://gmatclub.com/forum/surveys-show ... 83639.html
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mymba99
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Own Kudos [?]: 4317 [117]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   17 Jul 2008, 07:27
107
Kudos
10
Bookmarks
MamtaKrishnia wrote:
vdhawan1 wrote:
i think E is the correct answer on this one

because it might be possible that the figures ( as in our example) for one company might not reflect the status of the industry


vdhawan1,
The argument says 'manufacturers have been spending' . This means the industry in general not one company.
Also what option E states is
figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company
Which means the concepts that apply to the whole may not always apply to the parts.

This is what confused me too. Because the other way around it makes sense.

In any case OA is E.
But i still understand why :(


Paraphrasing the argument:
Inspite of spending large amounts of money, only 10% switched brands. (in the entire industry)
So, why to spend so much money when you see only 10% results?

Sounds reasonable. But there is a problem.

Lets say the entire smoking industry consists of 2 companies A and B with 50 customers each.
And each company spends money to make customers switch the brand.
So total industry smokers = 100.

After 1 year, lets say 10 smokers from A switched to B.
So, A = 40, B = 60. So we can say in the entire industry, 10 % swithced the brand.
BUT, lets see what B's CEO thinks. TO him, the increase is 20%. ( last year = 50, this year = 60, percentage of increase = 20).
And if you tell him "why to spend so much money when you see only 10% results?" he will not accept it.Because he is seeing good results.
But at the same time, A's CEO may accept the above statement.

So now, the fact(10% swithched brands) which is true to the entire industry is NOT true to the company B. (due to +ve change)

And thats exactly what option E is saying.
nice question. +1 to you.
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14816
Own Kudos [?]: 64883 [84]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 07 Nov 2023, 06:10
55
Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
MamtaKrishnia wrote:

Project CR Butler:Day 33:Critical Reasoning (CR1)


For all CR butler Questions Click Here

Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines. It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs
(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future
(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time
(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes
(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company


Check its detailed video solution here: https://youtu.be/3s0tWn3tiT8?feature=shared

- every year only 10 percent of smokers switch brands.
- manufacturers spend 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines.

Conclusion: Inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

The conclusion seems reasonable. The companies spend 10% of gross receipts on marketing but only 10% people in the entire industry switch brands. It seems that so much marketing budget may not have been of much use.

the best criticism of the conclusion is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs

This is not a criticism. The figures could be represented in any terms. They still stay the same.

(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future

There is no discussion of future. The conclusion talks about past "... did not pay ... would have been no worse off ..."

(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time

No such assumption is made. 10% people switch brands even if they are using multiple brands.

(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes

No such assumption. A manufacturer could produce multiple brands and advertise for all. Still only 10% people switch brands.

(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company

This says that though the "10% people" figure seems small industry wise, it may be a good number for a company.
Say there are 5 brands (A, B, C..) with each having 20 loyalists for a total of 100 smokers. Say 10 of these 100 switch brands (from B, C, D and E) and come over to A. Now A has 30 loyalists. That is a 50% increase in its customer base. So the 10% marketing budget may have been worth it.

Hence this is the criticism of the conclusion.

Answer (E)

Originally posted by KarishmaB on 29 Jan 2019, 06:02.
Last edited by KarishmaB on 07 Nov 2023, 06:10, edited 1 time in total.
General Discussion
User avatar
Ashwin_Mohan
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 105
Own Kudos [?]: 90 [14]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   17 Jul 2008, 06:36
10
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
MamtaKrishnia wrote:
vdhawan1 wrote:
i think E is the correct answer on this one

because it might be possible that the figures ( as in our example) for one company might not reflect the status of the industry


vdhawan1,
The argument says 'manufacturers have been spending' . This means the industry in general not one company.
Also what option E states is
figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company
Which means the concepts that apply to the whole may not always apply to the parts.

This is what confused me too. Because the other way around it makes sense.

In any case OA is E.
But i still understand why :(


Let me try and explain this to you.

Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines. It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on
(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs
(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future
(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time
(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes
(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company

Break this down.

Conclusion : Inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay dividends.

Evidence 1 : Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands.
Evidence 2 : Cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

What really links the evidence to the conclusion?

1. That the surveys are accurate and that they can be generalised.
2. The companies sales are dependent on the survey(no matter what the company does).

What can turn this around??

Option 1 : Surveys are not accurate
Option 2: Companies sales are not dependent on the survey and they can influence customers to change brands by different strategies.

Option 1 is not there in the answer choices
Option 2 is what E talks about...hence E.

C was close (if 'at any one time' was not present in the answer choice), what it does is weakens what the survey tries to prove, and thus strengthens option 1.
avatar
B
anujsp
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   09 Mar 2018, 12:35
1
Kudos
Hi.. can you please help me with eliminating option c?
User avatar
L
abhimahna
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [2]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   11 Mar 2018, 04:57
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
anujsp wrote:
Hi.. can you please help me with eliminating option c?


Hey anujsp ,

C is very easy to rule out.

We are already given than 10% of the customers are still switching brands. That means atleast some were there who switched.

But C is saying each smoker was loyal. Isn't that breaking the premise?

Hence, C is wrong.

Does that make sense?
User avatar
D
Gladiator59
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
Posts: 645
Own Kudos [?]: 2052 [0]
Given Kudos: 174
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   11 Mar 2018, 05:52
abhimahna wrote:
anujsp wrote:
Hi.. can you please help me with eliminating option c?


Hey anujsp ,

C is very easy to rule out.

We are already given than 10% of the customers are still switching brands. That means atleast some were there who switched.

But C is saying each smoker was loyal. Isn't that breaking the premise?

Hence, C is wrong.

Does that make sense?


I think we rule out C more so by the fact that it helps strengthen the conclusion rather than weaken it as is the question prompt. Even though you are correct in pointing out that each smoker is not loyal to one brand due to the fact that 10% are changing it.

E was harder to digest as OA.

Is it only by the virtue of " bad among the worst " that E ends up weakening the conclusion?
User avatar
L
abhimahna
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   11 Mar 2018, 06:27
Expert Reply
Gladiator59 wrote:
I think we rule out C more so by the fact that it helps strengthen the conclusion rather than weaken it as is the question prompt. Even though you are correct in pointing out that each smoker is not loyal to one brand due to the fact that 10% are changing it.

E was harder to digest as OA.

Is it only by the virtue of " bad among the worst " that E ends up weakening the conclusion?


Hey Gladiator59 ,

I would never jump to the conclusion if I see there is any thing that is breaking the premise. This is strictly not allowed. The moment I see each person is disloyal in option C while 10% disloyal in the premise, I will reject C without a second thought.

E very well explains the weakner. It says it may happen that the survey is for the entire industry while concluding the same thing for each of the cigarette company shouldn't be a good idea.

Does that make sense?
User avatar
D
Gladiator59
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
Posts: 645
Own Kudos [?]: 2052 [0]
Given Kudos: 174
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   11 Mar 2018, 06:32
abhimahna wrote:
Gladiator59 wrote:
I think we rule out C more so by the fact that it helps strengthen the conclusion rather than weaken it as is the question prompt. Even though you are correct in pointing out that each smoker is not loyal to one brand due to the fact that 10% are changing it.

E was harder to digest as OA.

Is it only by the virtue of " bad among the worst " that E ends up weakening the conclusion?


Hey Gladiator59 ,

I would never jump to the conclusion if I see there is any thing that is breaking the premise. This is strictly not allowed. The moment I see each person is disloyal in option C while 10% disloyal in the premise, I will reject C without a second thought.

E very well explains the weakner. It says it may happen that the survey is for the entire industry while concluding the same thing for each of the cigarette company shouldn't be a good idea.

Does that make sense?


Hi abhimahna, thanks for writing back.

I realized how E fits in perfectly by reading other answers again.

Also, I get the point you are trying to make. Any option which breaks premise has to be discarded.

Best,
Gladi
User avatar
L
gmatexam439
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1090
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [3]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: McDonough '21 (A$) Jones '21 (A$) Kelley '23 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   13 Mar 2018, 01:57
3
Bookmarks
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines. It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs --Cost is a cost that the company incurs
(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future --The argument doesn't compare future/past patters
(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time --This doesn't help us in reaching at the conclusion
(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes --This doesn't help us in reaching at the conclusion
(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company --Correct. The argument is wrongly comparing 10% figure of ALL the companies and the reaching a conclusion specific to one company
User avatar
G
rish2708
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 199
Own Kudos [?]: 212 [0]
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   27 Nov 2018, 07:29
How to neglect option A?
Here what I perceived:
"and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising."
This is the conclusion we have to weaken.
It says that economically they are weak because of advertising. What if the gross is still proper?
Option a says that

computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs

So just based on advertising costs we can't say that advertising costs economlically to the company

Please let me know where I was wrong..

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
S
NinetyFour
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Posts: 191
Own Kudos [?]: 173 [0]
Given Kudos: 78
Send PM
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   01 Jan 2019, 12:24
MamtaKrishnia wrote:
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines. It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs
(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future
(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time
(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes
(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company

To be honest this question is challenging because B, C, and E all present criticisms of the conclusion. If someone can share insight into why D is better than B and C, I'd love to know­
User avatar
S
kanakdaga
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 152 [2]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Schools: XLRI GMBA '20 Yale '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   02 Jan 2019, 05:26
2
Kudos
kchen1994 wrote:
MamtaKrishnia wrote:
To be honest this question is challenging because B, C, and E all present criticisms of the conclusion. If someone can share insight into why D is better than B and C, I'd love to know


Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines.
CONCLUSION : It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay[/b], and that cigarette [b]companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs.
INCORRECT: overall costs are irrelevant when it clearly stated as a percent of some other components. It would have been relevant if the conclusion would have mentioned overall costs as a base.

(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future.
INCORRECT: if we look at the conclusion, it is still based on the evaluation of past results. "companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising."
There is no link to the future. The argument is not basing any prediction or future claim on the basis of the past patterns. It is evaluating the past results on basis of past actions of the companies.

(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time.
INCORRECT. This clearly is not the assumption let alone a loophole. it is explicitly mentioned that 10% of people did switch. So "each" rules out this option.

(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes
INCORRECT.
If we negate the conclusion, this answer choice does not support the negated conclusion.
Strategy for weakening: negate the conclusion and look for supporting the negated conclusion - inducing smokers to switch brands paid off.
one brand of cigarettes doesn't really contribute.

(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company
CORRECT. Now there we have a major discrepancy pointed out. 10% of all smokers versus at least one company that could have benefitted.
This supports the negated conclusion that inducing smokers did pay off.


PLEASE KUDOS IF THIS HELPS :D[/b]­
avatar
B
Pas4867
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   21 Feb 2019, 03:15
C, I can see is definitely wrong. If each smoker only ever smokes one brand at any given time, then getting those 10% to switch brands will actually be very good for the company. It doesn’t matter if they only smoke on brand at a time, because we know that 10% do switch every year. In fact, this only strengthens the argument, since it cleanly breaks the smokers into distinct groups which in turn makes the statistics on them switching groups much clearer.



Looking at the rest, E is the right option. The conclusion is that spending money to convince smokers to switch brands did not pay off.

The evidence presented in favor of this conclusion is that only 10% of smokers switch brands every year and that dropping advertising efforts would not negatively effect the cigarette companies, economically. This conclusion relies on two assumptions, that these surveys are accurate and that the sales for any particular company are dependent on the information presented in the surveys.



E refutes the second assumption, stating that while these figures might reflect true for the industry as whole, they do not necessarily apply to each company.



None of the other options address these two assumptions, so E is the best answer.
avatar
B
bn1
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   07 Mar 2019, 18:24
What if an option meaning is not clear & understanding the meaning takes much time?Is practicing is the only solution.?
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63649 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   13 Mar 2019, 06:30
Expert Reply
bn1 wrote:
What if an option meaning is not clear & understanding the meaning takes much time?Is practicing is the only solution.?

Hi bn1, unfortunately there is no short, easy answer to your question, but check out our CR Guide for Beginners and see if that helps.
User avatar
S
Priyanka1293
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: India
Schools: Ross '22 (WL) Yale '22 (I) Kelley '22 (A$) Kellogg '22 (D) LBS '22 (D) Stern '22 (A$) Kenan-Flagler '22 (A$)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   11 May 2019, 08:16
1
Kudos
Why is C wrong?
There could be a possibility that cigarette smokers start smoking new brands without really switching from their bold.
They started smoking cigarettes of 2 brands instead of just 1.
User avatar
L
MartyTargetTestPrep
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5134 [2]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   11 May 2019, 09:22
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
PriyankaWadhwa wrote:
Why is C wrong?
There could be a possibility that cigarette smokers start smoking new brands without really switching from their bold.
They started smoking cigarettes of 2 brands instead of just 1.

I guess one could argue that a smoker who starts smoking two brands rather than one has switched to smoking the second brand at least some of the time, unless that smoker has started smoking cigarettes two at a time, an unlikely scenario.

In that case, the part time switch could be included in the 10 percent who switched.

Overall, while your logic makes some sense, probably it wouldn't constitute support for a GMAT CR correct answer, because it involves two "what if,"s: "what if someone starts smoking two brands rather than one" and "what if we don't consider that action a switch."
User avatar
S
jawele
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [0]
Given Kudos: 658
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   16 Jun 2019, 10:47
Indeed, this one is hard to solve in less than two minutes ...

Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines. It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising. (can be ignored as the questions explicitly tells us what we need to do)

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs what do we know about costs? Since we would have to make assumptions to come up with a likely effect, this cannot be the correct choice
(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future this strengthens the conclusion because B well applies to the conclusion: only 10% switch brands and smokers will continue to switch as they pick one brand over another (e.g. concentration of the switchers on one brand may benefit some manufacturer, but this choice argues against such an idea)
(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time since it's an assumption, we can negate to check whether it weakens the conclusion: knowing that smokers are not loyal to one brand does seem to affect the argument as we know nothing about those brands - smokers will keep changing one or more brands
(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes again, since this is an assumption, we can negate it, but the negation doesn't add to the argument because there doesn't seem to be a reasonable link between the # of brands produced and smoker behaviour associated with the brands
(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company this strengthens because if 10% of smokers switch to one brand, then that brand receives a commensurate bump in its revenues
avatar
B
priarav
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 331
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink] New post   31 Jan 2021, 03:24
VeritasKarishma wrote:

(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company

This says that though the "10% people" figure seems small industry wise, it may be a good number for a company.
Say there are 5 brands (A, B, C..) with each having 20 loyalists for a total of 100 smokers. Say 10 of these 100 switch brands (from B, C, D and E) and come over to A. Now A has 30 loyalists. That is a 50% increase in its customer base. So the 10% marketing budget may have been worth it.

Hence this is the criticism of the conclusion.

Answer (E)


I understand that the assumption is "figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company", but why is this a criticism of the conclusion if the conclusion is based on this assumption? On the contrary, isn't this statement a support for the conclusion?
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers swit [#permalink]
31 Jan 2021, 03:24
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions