Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 22:52
Customize  |  Hide

CR--Contrary to labour leaders

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

CR--Contrary to labour leaders [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2010, 23:36
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors—such as foreign competition—beyond the control of American workers.


Answer says A
GMAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Accepting donations for the mohater MBA fund
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 1821
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Economics
Schools: Ross '14 (M)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GMAT 2: Q V
GPA: 3.54
WE: Accounting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 318 [0], given: 232

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: CR--Contrary to labour leaders [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2010, 19:54
Already answered:
1000-cr-query-weaken-the-arguement-95754.html#p737155

Please search in the future. Also, please post in the correct forum (this belongs in the CR forum, not the GMAT forum.

Locked.
_________________

Strategy Discussion Thread | Strategy Master | GMAT Debrief| Please discuss strategies in discussion thread. Master thread will be updated accordingly. | GC Member Write Ups

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Re: CR--Contrary to labour leaders   [#permalink] 18 Jul 2010, 19:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Sc-labour force sarnia 3 06 Jan 2004, 18:08
New posts SC Labour saurya_s 3 19 Jan 2005, 09:21
Moved topic Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central abhinav24 18 03 Nov 2008, 11:45
New posts CR labour union greatchap 2 09 Apr 2010, 23:53
New posts rank of word labour ITMRAHUL 1 19 Jun 2011, 19:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR--Contrary to labour leaders

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  

Moderator: mohater



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.