To hold criminals for their crimes involves a failure

Here's another one: happy solving...answer will follow soon.

To hold criminals for their crimes involves a failure to recognise that criminal actions, like all actions are ultimately products of the environment that forged the agent's character. it is not criminals but people in the law abiding majority who by their actions do most to create and maintain this environment. Therefore, it is law abiding people whose actions and nothing else, make them alone truly responsible for crime.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to critism on the grounds that:

A.it exploits an ambiguity in the term "environment" by treating 2 different meanings of the word as thought they were equivalent.

B.it fails to distinguish between actions that are socially acceptable andactions that are socially unacceptable.

C.the way it distinguishes criminals from crimes implicitly denies that someone becomes a criminal solely in virtue of having commited a crime.

D.its conclusion is a generalisation of statistical evidence drawn from only a small minority of the population.

E.its conclusion contradicts an implicit principle on which an earlier part of the argument is based.