Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Aug 2014, 01:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 356
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2004, 13:36
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Please explain
Attachments

crimg.jpg
crimg.jpg [ 58.69 KiB | Viewed 548 times ]

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2004, 13:49
C is an assumption according to me. The conclusion says that it is enough to meet the need of....so if you negate C the conclusion doesn't hold good
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 156 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2004, 13:55
Only A and E are contenders but I go with A
A) If it is not possible to recover the oil from those far away regions, how can we say that there is enough oil supply for 500 years?
C) even though oil will NOT be an important energy source in the future, it does not change the fact that there will be enough supply for 500 years
E) Even though there is no new technology that will make oil drilling more feasible, actual technology may be sufficient
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 182
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2004, 14:13
My choice is A.

I see no choice other than A which provides any proper assumption which supports the conclusion.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 52
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2004, 19:54
I messed it up, Went with C and after Paul's explination, it makes sense.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 340
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2004, 05:13
My vote is for A

The author concludes that the oil needs of the world can be met. Thus, there will be enough oil only if one can have the existing oil + more oil than that exists now. And this will happen only if one can recover oil from unexplored area.

If you know therez oil in an area and you are not able to explore it, it will be of no use. There will be shortage in the future.
_________________

510 on my first GMAT. 610 on second GMAT.!
The struggle continues.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 356
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2004, 05:24
The OA is B. But I think that is wrong because the argument already assumes that the future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2004, 10:25
Definitely A

Not sure why OA is B ... doesnt make sense .... what's the source of the Q?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2004, 17:46
gmatblast wrote:
The OA is B. But I think that is wrong because the argument already assumes that the future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.


How shocking???? I hold on with A
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2004, 19:26
another 'stunning' OA. How can (B) be right ? The author already concludes that acceleration of oil consumption is not a big deal and that should not be based on the assumption that rate of consumption staying constant.
(A) is better. Although projections may be right about availability of oil, there is no gaurantee they can be tapped into.
  [#permalink] 12 Aug 2004, 19:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Assumption about the third side? retro 7 16 Apr 2011, 09:56
ASSUMPTION CR raghavs 3 29 Mar 2010, 10:02
CR: Assumption (tricky) GMATT73 6 07 May 2005, 19:21
CR: Assumption Question Anna Rama 4 02 Jan 2005, 13:46
CR Geologist saurya_s 3 13 Sep 2004, 05:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.