Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 05:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation please

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1550
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation please [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2007, 07:00
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Meteorologists say that if only they could design an accurate mathematical model of the atmosphere with all its complexities, they could forecast the weather with real precision. But this is an idle boast, immune to any evaluation, for any inadequate weather forecast would obviously be blamed on imperfections in the model.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author’s position that the meteorologists’ claim cannot be evaluated?

(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.

(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.

(C) Mathematical models of the meteorological aftermath of such catastrophic events as volcanic eruptions are beginning to be constructed.

(D) Modern weather forecasts for as much as a full day ahead are broadly correct about 80 percent of the time.

(E) Meteorologists readily concede that the accurate mathematical model they are talking about is not now in their power to construct.

Last edited by tarek99 on 23 Dec 2007, 07:57, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation ple [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2007, 07:31
tarek99 wrote:
Meteorologists say that if only they could design an accurate mathematical model of the atmosphere with all its complexities, they could forecast the weather with real precision. But this is an idle boast, immune to any evaluation, for any inadequate weather forecast would obviously be blamed on imperfections in the model.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author’s position that the meteorologists’ claim cannot be evaluated?

(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.

(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.

(C) Mathematical models of the meteorological aftermath of such catastrophic events as volcanic eruptions are beginning to be constructed.
(D) Modern weather forecasts for as much as a full day ahead are broadly correct about 80 percent of the time.

(E) Meteorologists readily concede that the accurate mathematical model they are talking about is not now in their power to construct.


how about 'E'
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 258
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2007, 08:07
I would go with B.

We are looking for something that negates the author's point that weather predictions would not improve even though mathematical models improve...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2007, 15:06
I would go with B, as we are looking for some validations here and B does it partially.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 286
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation ple [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2007, 16:43
tarek99 wrote:
Meteorologists say that if only they could design an accurate mathematical model of the atmosphere with all its complexities, they could forecast the weather with real precision. But this is an idle boast, immune to any evaluation, for any inadequate weather forecast would obviously be blamed on imperfections in the model.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author’s position that the meteorologists’ claim cannot be evaluated?

(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.

(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.

(C) Mathematical models of the meteorological aftermath of such catastrophic events as volcanic eruptions are beginning to be constructed.

(D) Modern weather forecasts for as much as a full day ahead are broadly correct about 80 percent of the time.

(E) Meteorologists readily concede that the accurate mathematical model they are talking about is not now in their power to construct.


B for me too.

A) talks only about data, not the model
C) irrelevant
D) irrelevant
E) irrelevant

Only B talks about the increase in accuracy of models and corresponding increase in the precision of weather forecasts.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1101
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation ple [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 02:29
The authors say that it is impossibile to evaluate meteorologists' claim in that every inadequate forecast would be caused by an imperfection in the model. But the problem is not the imperfection..it is the inability of meteorologist...why not E??? what's OA?????
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 02:49
B.
Meteorologists claim that an accurate mathematical model of atmosphere could result in precise forecast of the weather. The author says this claim cannot be evaluated because any inadequate forecast would be blamed on inaccuracy of the model.
But, if it is known that with every improvement in the model is clearly measurable in terms of the precision of forecast, that is to say that there exists a clear relationship between accuracy of the model and precision of forecasts, author's claim stands false.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 139
Location: Boston,MA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 18:59
One more for E
_________________

--gregspirited

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 20:51
A looks good too..
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 573
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation ple [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 22:08
go for B,

tarek99 wrote:
Meteorologists say that if only they could design an accurate mathematical model of the atmosphere with all its complexities, they could forecast the weather with real precision. But this is an idle boast, immune to any evaluation, for any inadequate weather forecast would obviously be blamed on imperfections in the model.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author’s position that the meteorologists’ claim cannot be evaluated?

(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.----->

neutral, the author speaks about an accurate mathematical model with all its complexities, the answer choice is about some approximation of accurate mathematical model.


(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.---->

B says that precise weather forecast is authomatic result of accurate mathematical model (whenever there is A, there is B). This makes the criticism (blue text) obsolete.

(C) Mathematical models of the meteorological aftermath of such catastrophic events as volcanic eruptions are beginning to be constructed.
---->

irrelevant

(D) Modern weather forecasts for as much as a full day ahead are broadly correct about 80 percent of the time.---->

irrelevant

(E) Meteorologists readily concede that the accurate mathematical model they are talking about is not now in their power to construct.--->

so what?, the info is irrelevant
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1550
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2007, 22:12
OA is B
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation ple [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2007, 06:22
Edited-OKAY B seems likely although A is trap
Re: CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation ple   [#permalink] 28 Dec 2007, 06:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
CR- I like this one Piter 3 30 Aug 2007, 14:24
Here's another one MBAlad 8 02 Dec 2006, 18:55
Couldnt figure this one out - any explanations would be a diegmat 5 16 Sep 2006, 06:39
I am would like to get brain dump from the CR guru's here as briozeal 0 30 Jun 2006, 17:09
Here is another one saurya_s 0 12 Sep 2004, 19:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR: Here is another one. Would like an explanation please

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.