Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 02:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR - Irradiation of Foods.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

CR - Irradiation of Foods. [#permalink] New post 09 Apr 2007, 22:35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
For the CR below IMO is E. Can someone explain why it is so?

My opinion: the way B1 associated with either process is compounded can’t explain why irradiation is no worse than cooking. E doesn’t take into consideration the fact that much irradiated food is eaten raw.

Just by process of elimination my pick would be C.


23-30: Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers
the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant
percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point
out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either
beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since
_______.
A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s
having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect
that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas
irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than
carefully controlled irradiation is
E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated
with either process individually is compounded
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 299
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2007, 01:22
C is correct.

The argument is about irradiation of food for sale, not about cooking food.

Perhaps I buy broccoli for its vitaman content, and love to eat that food row for the same reason, only to find out that there is no vitamans in it.

We cannot compare apples and oranges. The proper comparision would be between irradiated and non-irradiated foods.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2007, 03:18
defenestrate:

Thanks for your explanation
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1560
Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 162 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2007, 07:30
I have to disagree with C.

The last sentence is intended to refute the argument that irradiation is no worse than cooking.

However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since

The bold face segment is designed to argue that irradiation of foods which would be eaten raw will not be harmed by cooking. Thus irradiation is unnecessary and harmful for such food.

The section following the bold faced says 'or else misleading, since...'. This section is intended to prove that irradiation is harmful even for cooked foods. E completes the argument logically by stating that irradiation compounds the negative effect of cooking.

Thus E would be my pick.

Last edited by ncp on 10 Apr 2007, 09:01, edited 1 time in total.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2007, 08:16
ncprasad wrote:
I have to disagree with C.

The last sentence is intended to refute the argument that irradiation is no worse by cooking.

However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since

The bold face segment is designed to argue that irradiation of foods which would be eaten raw will not be harmed by cooking. Thus irradiation is unnecessary and harmful for such food.

The section following the bold faced says 'or else misleading, since...'. This section is intended to prove that irradiation is harmful even for cooked foods. E completes the argument logically that irradiation compounds the negative effect of cooking.

Thus E would be my pick.


Good one >:d<
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Irradiation of Foods. [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2007, 09:55
dvtohir wrote:
For the CR below IMO is E. Can someone explain why it is so?

My opinion: the way B1 associated with either process is compounded can’t explain why irradiation is no worse than cooking. E doesn’t take into consideration the fact that much irradiated food is eaten raw.

Just by process of elimination my pick would be C.


23-30: Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers
the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant
percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point
out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either
beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since
_______.
A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s
having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect
that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas
irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than
carefully controlled irradiation is
E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated
with either process individually is compounded


The key word here is "or misleading".
The claim of irradiation proponents: irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.
Opposing point: much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading.
If the irradiated food is cooked again, more of Vitamin B1 is lost than is lost by either irradiation or cooking by themselves.
Re: CR - Irradiation of Foods.   [#permalink] 10 Apr 2007, 09:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Activist: Food producers irradiate food in order to prolong getgyan 3 01 Oct 2012, 01:02
5 The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards devpanda 10 02 May 2012, 21:32
Experts publish their posts in the topic Activist: Food producers irradiate food in order to prolong hitman4683v1 15 14 Oct 2009, 09:46
17 Experts publish their posts in the topic The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards TriColor 39 23 Aug 2009, 14:04
Activist: Food producers irradiate food in order to prolong rdg 5 01 Mar 2007, 12:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR - Irradiation of Foods.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.